 Absolutely. And it's important to talk about this. You said that she issued – it was a 93-page – this is an incredibly sober and well-reasoned decision. You're going to have all these armchair lawyers who probably don't even read the opinion, for heaven's sakes. You look at X and you see these flash decisions or these flash opinions, and it's clear that these folks haven't even bothered reading the opinion. You have this well-reasoned where she engages in this really – she utilizes these sophisticated tools of statutory construction to ultimately conclude that the deployment of Jack Smith is improper.