 absolutely and it's important to talk about this you said that she issued it was 93 pages this is an incredibly sober and well-reasoned decision you're going to have all these armchair lawyers who probably don't even read the opinion for heaven's sakes you look at x and you see these flash decisions with these flash opinions it's clear that these folks haven't even bothered reading the opinion you have this well reasoned where she engages in this really sophisticated she utilizes these sophisticated tools of statutory construction to ultimately conclude that the point of jack smith is improper