 I see a point. And you believed he should have been charged under some sort of hacking offense instead, where he was trying to crack some kind of code or something like that. The problem I had with that was that there wasn't really clear evidence that he actually did that or said that did anything other than being on the phone. But, you know, at this point, does that really matter? Would that have been a better approach or was this simply the easiest way out?