 Arguing that you would think it'd be a lot more. It's supposed to be a right-wing court. Yeah, what? Oh, let me guess. Arguing that the case was one of the most significant free speech issues to reach the court. This is said it was the most significant free speech case to reach the court in years and criticized the majority for sidestepping the issue. That's what they did. They sidestepped the issue. The decision was based on the plaintiff's inability, the government's actions.