 Then that would be appealed. The other, I think, big wrinkle is the court said that motive is irrelevant. So the scope is very broad in that it's official if it's technically taken as president rather than say, okay, I'm talking to my Justice Department to direct them to investigate a political rival. That would be a motive versus I'm talking to my Justice Department to have them investigate terrorism, which would be within the scope I think regular people would think is legitimate. State of mind is not relevant.