 And we'll hear, of course, from the prosecutors on that in the days ahead. I want to ask a big picture question here. This ruling has been determined, interpreted as saying a president can do anything, including, as you guys discussed during oral arguments or in an earlier phase of this case, the president could order SEAL Team 6 to assassinate a political rival. Can't be tried for it. I know that some supporters of the ruling have said that's absurd. That would never happen. But it sure sounds to critics like it can. Wouldn't the president get away with that?