 is that Chief Justice Roberts prohibits, or the court prohibits, any consideration of presidential motive in trying to establish whether, A, a crime occurred, or B, something was official or unofficial. And of course, that's a little bit counterintuitive to people who've been following this, right? The idea that the president was talking to the attorney general with the motive of overturning an election, I think we'd all agree, is very different than the president talking to the attorney general with a good faith concern about election integrity. But that distinction is not allowed to be made