 If you restrict that authority, do you have $10 billion that you've saved to spend elsewhere, or do you have $50 billion that you've saved to spend elsewhere? It's not just the question of should the secretary or not have that authority. It's the question of how much do you save if you restrict that authority, and how might you spend it elsewhere? That's a major component of how the bills propose to pay for their other reforms and increases. And so answering that question is really important.