 Anyone, including Justice Sotomayor, thinks that the president doesn't have immunity for his official acts. The court had already sort of, and they relied on it. They looked at this issue back in 1981 in a case called Fitzgerald v. Nixon, which was a civil case. And the court said, of course the president has immunity from that. So they relied on that ruling. So it's nothing norm-breaking. It's nothing new. It's a continuation of their previous ruling.