 You said the word inclusive, which begins to point at some of the debates and disputes. Who's included? Whose story is it? And I don't want to oversimplify, but we could say there are a couple of big sides of the debate over history. And one, I guess, is symbolized by the 1619 Project put on by the New York Times, which effectively proposed a different founding date for America, focusing on the arrival of slavery. And, of course, there's been a lot of pushback from people on that. How do you think about that aspect of it?