 laws about going armed to the terror of the public and also surety laws. So I think, I mean, I would have liked to have seen them provide even more guidance, but what they're clearly saying here is you courts who have looked for a historical twin, and remember, there were no domestic violence protection orders in 1791. You're being too specific about that. You need to rise up to the level of principles and not to this level of, was there an exact, you know, a law exactly like this back in 1791?