 or in the Mipper-Pristone case, or in the CFPB case, that that proves that the Supreme Court's not ideological, I think is flawed at its inception. This is an ideologically divided court that just sometimes gets cases where even the justices can agree. Let me ask Jonathan to comment on that, because I think we have a very careful centrist majority, center-right majority, originalist and traditionalist. What do you think, Jonathan?