 create the rules that it did. It followed a process that seems pretty robust. There are some procedural arguments back and forth about whether that process was adequate. But the threshold of what the states had to prove to get this motion, this stay, was pretty high. And I'm not entirely convinced that it met that standard. It seems like the majority of the court did. And I think that that is part of a larger trend on this court to cabin EPA's ability to do its job.