 You'd sit there and say, I have determined as commander in chief that this is necessary. And the way that Judge Pan in the lower court phrased it was, what if the president decides that a political adversary is a threat to democracy and orders the killing? And why isn't that now an official act with a presumption of immunity? And remember, you don't look at motive. You can't consider that he's doing it to get rid of his adversary.