 They're all pitiful. How about the fact, most people didn't pick up on this, but he said twice he mentioned Clarence Thomas' dissent in the Supreme Court decision. It was a concurring opinion. In other words, I agree with the decision, but I want to add a few things. And he called it a dissent twice. I thought he was the smartest guy in his law school class. I mean, all I needed to see was in the first paragraph of the Clarence Thomas story. Concurring opinion. Right.