 criminal immunity for official acts while in office. And just to review, like, oral arguments seem to at least in some way go in Trump's favor, right? Even if he might not be given complete immunity. That's right. The justices, in terms of the actual merits of the immunity argument, they seem to stake out a middle ground where they're going to carve out some sort of test saying that some acts are immune for former presidents. But in terms of the practical effect for that in terms of Trump's cases, that would likely lead to a delay.