 had made an argument of, well, maybe the district judge, the trial judge, can work it out and send it to the jury, and then the jury can separate official from unofficial acts. Several times in this opinion, the Supreme Court, the majority, says explicitly, whatever the judge decides about what's official or unofficial, what's immune or not immune, that can be appealed back up. If it's about justice, why does it have to happen before the election? Well, I don't know. Maybe because all four of these indictments were political, and they were meant to interfere in the election. Maybe.