 That will obviously be discussed in the courts. But what it came down to is because the Bank of North Dakota, they had a small amount of loans with the Bank of North Dakota, that the Bank of North Dakota needed to sign off on that agreement, which they already paid off those loans to the Bank of North Dakota. So today they're not even a party to that. So it was kind of bizarre, the loophole in state statute they're trying to use to then claim that that area was now theirs and they should be compensated even though they made an agreement in 2000.