 This seems like a very basic civil protection for people. If you're going to have your Liberty taken away from you, right? Like the jury actually has to agree what the crime is. And judge said, you don't have to do that. And so that in addition to not allowing testimony from somebody who was going to say from the FTC, that this is not even a, you know, the underlying crime, I guess that you're alleging isn't even really a crime. So I think that that was sort of an important protection. Of course,