 I think so. I think you're absolutely right. I mean, she says at her point that he is functioning ultra viris. He is functioning extra constitutionally. He has no authority to do this. And everything he's done, everything he's done has been improper. Therefore, none of this has occurred from a legal constitutional standpoint. So that leaves the possibility that if the Department of Justice wanted to, they could start all over again, I suppose. But that raises a lot of practical litigation issues, doesn't it?