 And but they there doesn't seem to be any at this point real reason as to why they were just randomly shooting people, a 16 and an 18 year old. So is the 16 year old the the the ringleader or is that is that bad? That is still under that is still to be determined. What they do not know is because it was asked, was the 16 year old the shooter or the 18 year old the shooter or were they both the shooter?