 It is, but you don't, then the government's protected from any kind of abridgment on First Amendment. That's my interpretation. And I disagree with the syrupy, optimistic hot takes that say that this is, well, it's just about standing. That's, what? How is it just about standing? Because they had standing. The plaintiffs in this case had standing. They're representing taxpayers who were irrevocably affected by this.