 And so I'm very thrilled with that, and I trust him to do everything you just said. I agree. We're not looking at, as the left says, I'm not looking at a document that evolves or a document that is in flux. I'm looking at words, ink on the paper. They are fixed. And what we need support to do is look at that ink and say, what were the intentions of our founders? What does history support? What do their extra constitutional writings support? What do the Federalist Papers support?