 Well, based on the logic of this decision, I think she is. I mean, one of the things I think was striking here about the contrast between the majority opinion and the dissenting opinions is that the majority opinion is sort of thinking about Donald Trump and painstakingly dismantling these aspects of the indictment. But they allege to write a decision for the ages. This is supposed to govern presidential conduct going forward. Whereas I think the dissent thinks about this in terms of the current facts