 I don't think we've ever been in this situation. The court repeatedly, in the majority opinion, notes the need for a quote-unquote energetic executive. I will note that in an earlier case, Youngstown, this is a canonical case about executive power from the 1940s, many of the justices in that case really wrung their hands about the prospect of an energetic, nimble executive that could override and usurp the authority of other branches. Look at that.