 The debate, I think, quashed a lot of need to hear the audio. Like we saw what Robert Herr heard in the debate. We saw it. So here's my question, though. So with all that being said, is the congressional subpoena is what they're looking for so that they can try to politically embarrass somebody? Because that's not a proper use of a congressional subpoena. But is there a right to if you've turned the transcripts over?