 We'll have to see how that argument plays out. We really just expect this to be the first example of this landmark decision impacting the former president's criminal cases. It appears each of them will be impacted in some way, whether it be delays or significantly narrowing some of these cases. There was a lot of evidence in this trial. Now that the Supreme Court has ruled on immunity or partial immunity for a president, what does it change about the evidence that was presented at trial? What could be considered official acts or not official acts? Where does it lie legally here?