 go ahead and let the people vote on it. Of course they're going to vote it in. Who's going to vote against a 50% tax cut, right? But shouldn't this be at the appellate court level or even a court level? Instead of, you know, in other words, yeah, go ahead and let them vote on it. But this should be decided by court experts after briefing by lawyers, and it should be in front of judges to decide the legality of this thing. And Armistead Jones may well be right,