 This is Justice Amy Coney Barrett. She wrote the majority opinion. The plaintiffs rely on allegations of past government censorship as evidence that future censorship is likely, but they fail by and large to link their past social media restrictions to the defendant's communications with the platforms. Thus, the events of the past do little to help any of the plaintiffs establish standing to seek an injunction to prevent future harm. OK, but, you know, and I think Justice Alito went to this point.