 So the judge challenged the prosecution to come up with a comparable case. They couldn't do it. Over and over again, he challenged them. They couldn't do it. So it begs the question, Sebastian, why? Why, where my son was concerned, why did they lie and invent a felony? Why did they try to put this terrorism enhancement, which was dismissed by the judge? He refused to accept it. Why did they try to do that to my son?