 the law didn't recognize a negative easement for light, air, or view. But a different court shut down a pig farm on a four-acre parcel in town next to a motel. The pig farm wasn't operated with any semblance of a real farming operation. Conditions were so bad that the court didn't have much trouble determining that it had been created for spite and with malice and was a nuisance. So while the motel owner didn't have a negative easement for light, air, or view, the pig farm was shut down and was liable for damages because of the owner's bad conduct.