 that has no evidence for it, and you passionately defend that instead. I mean, that is when it becomes irrational. And that seems to be what's happened with, for instance, the moon landing stuff. But the point is that they're starting from a rational place, skepticism, and they're ending, every once in a while, in an irrational place. Ironically, if they end in an irrational place, it's not because of an overabundant skepticism. Rather, it's because they aren't applying the same skepticism to their alternative theory that they do to the official one.