 the agency's interpretation would be upheld. Now the Supreme Court said it got it wrong. The court said that Chevron's presumption was misguided because agencies have no special competence in resolving statutory ambiguities. Courts do. The decision is a big one for agriculture because of the many administrative issues farmers and ranchers can find themselves entangled in. At least in theory, the court's opinion establishes a higher threshold for agency rulemaking. Close may be good enough in horseshoes and hand grenades, but it won't be any more when it comes to agency rulemaking.