 The Trump lawyer argued that there were certain acts alleged in the complaint against President Trump constituted private acts for which he did not have immunity. So the question then was just what are those acts that are in between those two things, not allocated to the president by express constitutional authority and also not clearly private acts. So it was a middle-of-the-road decision, but of course some people decided to interpret the majority opinion by reading the histrionic opinion of Justice Sotomayor in dissent instead. Mm-hmm.