 The Supreme Court says a January 6th Capitol rioter should not have been charged with obstruction. The case involved a former Pennsylvania police officer charged for his alleged participation in the attack. The justice ruling 6-3 that the government's broad use of a 2002 law that specifically deals with obstruction does not apply to the officer and, by extension, others. It does not mean the officer and other rioters are absolved of any of the other charges they face.