 The case involved a former Pennsylvania police officer charged with obstruction for his alleged participation in the attack on the Capitol. The justices ruled 6-3 that the government's broad use of a 2002 law that specifically deals with obstruction does not apply to the officer and, by extension, others. It does not mean the officer and other rioters are absolved of any other of the charges they face. Legal experts say this ruling might be a good sign for former President Trump