 That's a great question. I think they were relying on this distinction that they tried to put forward between Julian Assange and a traditional journalist. But as I mentioned... So they say that he's a publisher, right? They don't see him as a journalist, is that right? They don't see him as a journalist, but that's really just some kind of atmospheric protection for the outlets that you just named who publish much of the same information. There's no legal distinction between the acts that they engaged in, the publication of information on their websites and in their newspapers...