 I'm glad that you brought that up because I think that her dissent brought up some really important points. She concurred with this decision in the sense that it is now allowing EMTALA, this federal law, to take precedence over the state near total abortion ban in Idaho. But she dissented in the sense that she thinks that the court really should have ruled on the merits in this case because the Supreme Court is just leaving this in limbo. And she said that