 New York Court of Appeals. The question is, can it be reversed before the election or will this constitute election interference? Imagine the situation that it's not reversed until after the election. It is reversed after the election. But in the meantime, he loses in a very, very narrow vote. And polls show that the reason he lost was because there was a conviction on the books, even though the conviction was reversed. That would give rise to a lot of negative feelings about our electoral system.