 And that's kind of striking to me. You know, the narratologist Porter Abbott made this lovely point that evolution isn't a good story because there are no characters, right? There's no agents. There's no intentions. The time scale is too vast. The pace is way too slow. It doesn't make a good story. Do you think Dennett was maybe just a tiny bit over-optimistic? I mean, I kind of like that about him, right? He was a good kind of salesman for a certain way of thinking about things. But is evolution really a good story?