 So I think that's Justice Sotomayor's larger point, which is there is another way to do this. It was a difficult question, but this isn't the only way to sort of parse these issues out. We could have done what I think most people on the street would tell you was the right thing to do, which is ask, what did he do and why did he do it? And did he do it in a way that is outside the bounds of his responsibilities as president? But that's not what the majority chose to do. They chose to draw a big line around immunity and to include almost everything the president does