 that if a president did something, and I'm paraphrasing, it can't be illegal, I think the court legitimated that, and that would have wiped away many of the scandals. It's possible to admit and see how Watergate might never have unfolded the way it did if this court ruling had been in place. So what does this do to the separation of powers that were created by the Constitution's framers? How does this compare with the very careful steps they took to create checks and balances?