 Well, that wasn't the case. That's not what the Second Amendment means. That's not even what was thought about when it was being written. So the historical context of that is a problem. You've got to have some reasons for doing this. It has to be the same kind of reasons that would have been something that were viable within the boundaries of the Constitution when it was written. It seems like some of the lower courts, particularly like O and the Ninth Circuit and places like that, don't like that interpretation.