 Probably not. I mean, is there any argument that he's, you know, I mean, you know, providing some service to maintain the value of the house or like, you know, there could be like a contract or an unjust enrichment claim. I mean, if he contributed to the purchase of the house, maybe he could do something. I wouldn't I would never say never without a little bit more analysis. So he's not making any claims that he bought stuff that he bought this house with her, is he?