 Yeah, I mean, it just depends on the roof space, the shade factor. I mean, everybody's property is a little bit different. So are there some that can't generate 100%? Yeah, exactly. And so having 80% of your bill covered versus none is still a better option because you still have a return on investment. All right, so have you had systems where you said to them, it really doesn't pay at all? I mean, really, because they didn't have the proper setup with the house or the exposure or never? Or is there always some benefit? What have you found?