 sort of an evidentiary rule that will make it harder to actually prosecute even crimes for which a former president's not immune. She said, that just doesn't make any sense. She said, I joined Justice Sotomayor's dissent on that point. Let me stop you there real quick, because that's important what you just said. The reality of that, saying that the evidence can't be used, and Justice Coney Barrett dissented there. Does that mean that a president could order his political rival