 And yet this court opinion would suggest, or the copy that was briefly posted would suggest, as their Mifepristone ruling did, that they aren't further taking away rights potentially with these decisions. They allowed Mifepristone access to maintain. They are allowing in emergency situations in which the stability of the mother would be risked without having an abortion to go forward. Is this, in some sense at least, taking away a talking point as we get farther and farther from Dobbs?