 All of which are designed not to elicit information from the person being interviewed, but to illustrate the journalist's moral superiority over the person he's talking to. All right. Oh, I got to stop right there because that is such a true statement. It's ridiculous. Yeah. Isn't it amazing how he goes into the psychology of all of this stuff that most people would never even touch on? But it's like we have observed these things and it's nice to have somebody validate that for you, you know?