 The legislation was considered controversial because lawmakers found out about it less than a week ago. House Speaker Matt Ritter says it was better received in his chamber than it was in the state Senate, although some members of his party did vote no. If there's real concerns about this transaction, then we said to them we would look at subsequent amendments or language to see how it goes. But on the other side, some might argue that a quasi-public agency running water systems might be better than a private one.