 He should have engaged them. And you know, I, I'm not sure of the veracity of that story. I'm not sure of the details of that story. It's really, to my knowledge, just a rumor at this point. And until the facts are confirmed on that, uh, you're going to have to hold judgment, but it sounds like if that's the way the scenario went down, the officer should have engaged. There should have been a gun battle. And unfortunately the officer probably didn't have a rifle, which probably put him at a serious disadvantage.