 No, it is literally what it says it is. I mean, fundamentally, even take aside things like Libya and Afghanistan and all the other stupid nonsense things that we did, it's fundamentally a collective defense alliance. It's only actually good... At that. Matter of fact, the reason why we screwed up in Libya and we screwed up in Afghanistan is that's not what NATO's good for. NATO's good for one thing, which is the defense of NATO territory. And the answer is...