 So, you know, if that's their worldview, Glenn, I think they're going to be very deferential to the idea that presidents, to be president, have to make really difficult decisions or, by the way, can't engage in political speech, which is ultimately what this case is really all about. There's a bunch of reasons why Jack Smith's case is flawed, but I do think the court's going to settle on some idea that, of course, presidents are immune from criminal prosecution, right?