 The Supreme Court just ruled a few days back that in a review of the case that you cannot convict somebody unless you have a unanimous jury on each and every count. You remember in this particular case, they couldn't get a consensus on all the counts. They just say there are 43 counts, and what did the judge do? He said, well, as long as you all agree that he did something within those 43, we will consider that a unanimous count and convict him on all 43.