 It says, requires a records custodian to provide a list of names instead of a signature protected under the provisions of this bill. So they're saying, oh, he said that he can't give the names. It's like, no, it says you have to give a list of names instead of a signature provided under this bill. And then it goes in and says the reasons basically why the signature wanted to protect that. I think it's a good thing. I think it's smart to protect someone's signature.