 Well, I think it's a very important decision because it points out that the Second Amendment, while it does protect the right of people to keep arms in their homes for self-defense, to bear arms is not unlimited. And there is a long tradition of being able to temporarily disarm people that have been demonstrated to be dangerous. There are due process issues that will have to be worked out, and lower courts, I'm sure, will deal with. But I think it's an important decision that helps us identify what some of the outer limits