 Absolutely. And it's important to talk about this. You said that she issued 93 pages. This is an incredibly sober and well-reasoned decision. You're going to have all these armchair lawyers who probably don't even read the opinion, for heaven's sake. You look at X and you see these flash decisions or these flash opinions. It's clear that these folks haven't even bothered reading the opinion. You have this well-reasoned where she engages in this really sophisticated... She utilizes these sophisticated tools of statutory construction to ultimately conclude that the point of Jack Smith is improper.