 wouldn't admit evidence that was to the contrary. I mean, these courts were extraordinarily biased, and they were extraordinarily corrupt. And so they came up with this sort of general amoeba pronouncement that Trump was guilty of insurrection on January 6th, but there was no evidence to back that up, and they weren't using evidence to come to that conclusion. And you can sit there as somebody else on the left, and you can say, you're wrong, Leland, I saw it on my own. Fine. But the evidence wasn't entered into court