 really acting out a lot, and that I think is a dangerous precedent. I view it differently. I think that everything the court did with the previous overturning Chevron is actually returning the concept of due process and removing the draconian nature of public agencies and saying, hey, you guys are still answerable. You're still subject to checks and balances. You can make rules, but we get to interpret what those are. That's our function as the judiciary. The one thing I think in this case here, and we're coming up on our quickness, I'll just give my quick take like this.