 there forming the team and responsible for the results. To what extent is he really responsible for the successes and the failures? Is it about picking the team? Is it about training them? Or is it really down to the players? And that's a mystery I don't know the answer to. Well, presumably the manager's fairly important. He's a fairly celebrated figure, especially if he wins. But that's what we all assume. And yet if you've got some brilliant players, is it really not down to them rather than to the manager?