 But generally under the law, presumption means you have to have super-duper evidence. You have to really show that this is not official conduct. And I think there's an argument that pretty much anything a president does, so long as they're still technically president and in the Oval Office and talking to other federal government officials, that is off-limits for any kind of legal accountability. So Justice Sotomayor's dissent sort of saying this creates a king in the White House, I don't think it's hyperbole.