 If this court reaches the merits, it should reaffirm that government speech crosses the line into coercion only if, viewed objectively, it conveys a threat of adverse government action. And because no threats happened here, the court should reverse. On the other side, Louisiana Solicitor General J. Benjamin Aguanyaga told the justices during oral arguments the communication between the White House and FBI and social media companies did amount to coercion that resulted in censorship.