 And whether or not he had a permit to carry would have played any calculus in his decision to make that heinous attack. I'm wondering, the court cited a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, which was what, 2022, I believe, where a six to three majority of justices ruled that folks have a right to carry handguns outside the home. Did that ruling at all set the stage for this one to come down in favor of gun rights advocates?