 You know, Katie, one of the things that's puzzling to me is that the court indicated they didn't decide the case on the merits, but whether or not these physicians had standing. Now, if these doctors who are treating women who are damaged by this drug don't have standing, then the question is, who does? I'm wondering if you have to be an abortionist in order to have standing to challenge the FDA's position. Can you sort of explain that to me? Why is it that these doctors didn't have standing? And if they don't, then who on earth would?