 said, look, the principles of the court should generally adhere to their past cases. He doesn't admit that. He says that does not provide a reason to uphold the Chevron doctrine, is what he said. That doesn't mean, okay, automatically we have to follow it just because of that. We have to look at it and delve into it. So on the issue of stare decisis, which is, again, paying deference to prior court rulings, I get that. And it is a...