 You know, the framing was sort of, you know, this court doesn't have a heart, and we hope at some point they will realize the plight of homeless people and realize it is cruel and unusual to tell them, you can't, you know, stay here. We can't provide for where you are to go, but you can't be here. Yeah, and I think a lot of other people, at least on the policy question, because the legal question is a different one. The constitutional one is a different one. I think it's just nutty to say a local city government cannot sweep out homeless encampments. Like, that is...