 actually pretty atypical for this court, which I think is one of the narratives that a lot of people have gotten wrong. I think intentionally so. We've talked about that here. But if you're going to say six conservatives, three liberals, this was one of those cases, I'm just surprised it's not 9-0. It seems like the other position is a crazy one, but obviously three members of the court disagree. What's the upshot there?