 No, and I think there's a lot of hysteria about Justice Thomas' dissent. I talked to a leading analyst at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative arm that's planning a blueprint for a second Trump term agenda. And I don't think any conservative scholars are calling for that. Precedent is precedent for a reason. And Sarah Partial Perry says rescinding marriage rights isn't on the table. It is within the ability of the Supreme Court in a single day to roll back our rights of the last 20 years, 40 years, 50 years, right?