 Did they actually do the opposite? Did they actually worsen his political predicament by agreeing to this debate historically earlier than we've ever seen before in presidential history? The moderators chose to focus on issues up top, like economy, abortion. The other issue Americans have raised is, like you said, can either of these guys function in the Oval Office for four years, like four years from now? Did the style of this debate, did the rambling, did some of the incoherence almost provide more insight than maybe their policy positions?