 It's important, and particularly considering that the whole point of their rule is that, look, what happens in one state affects other states. So the idea that they still want it enforced in some states while other states are still going to be going through the process and not having it enforced sort of defeats the whole purpose of what they're saying the point of the rule is. So there's sort of a circular argument for EPA to kind of get into, and I think not surprisingly we wound up where we did with the court ruling against them here. Okay. Harrington v. Purdue Pharma.