 then he builds it into a natural expense of the organization, and he can therefore at that time make that decision. The company that becomes a viable expense for the company saves him money. He loses no income, and we're only talking about 12 months. I just don't think this tradeoff makes any sense. There's no urgency here. There's no urgency. By the way, it's not feasible. Financially, it's not feasible for Garrett. What would you do, Garrett, to cover your expenses with no income? Have you thought about that?