 I think the companies claim that their First Amendment rights as publishers were being violated if they were forced to carry certain speech on their platforms. I obviously disagree with that. They faced a little bit of an uphill battle with the court based on what I heard in argument. But the court was actually more receptive to it than I had anticipated. I still don't think it's going to come out favorably for the states. But yeah, we'll see. And it really doesn't directly affect this. Right.