 Uh, I think it's the, the company's claimed that their first amendment rights as publishers were being violated if they were forced to carry certain speech on their platforms. Um, I obviously disagree with that. They faced a little bit of an uphill battle with the court based on what I heard in argument, but the court was actually more receptive to it than I had anticipated. I still don't think it's going to come out favorably for the state, but I, yeah, we'll see. Um, and I, it really doesn't directly affect this. Right.