 than it actually was. This is a landmark statue, a landmark statue that had been amended over and over again in order to capture more and more kinds of pollution. And yet when Roberts looks at it, he sees only this kind of minor statute that does almost nothing to protect Americans and the environment from emissions from coal-fired power plants. Why is that? Well, at a minimum, he gets his priors confirmed by amicus briefs that put forth a reading that I just don't think aligns with what we see in the congressional record or the plaintiff's