 that it's just kind of stray language that shouldn't mean anything and the EPA can't use it to cite any power. Well, Roberts ended up running with that. That was like the heart of his opinion. He said, this is a backwater. It doesn't mean anything. It's nonsense. But I think that he was only able to get there because all of these amicus briefs came in, egging him on, rewriting the history of the statute, claiming that the Clean Air Act was much more modest