 Now, that may well be acceptable in various kinds of disputes having to do with whether or not you can put people on boats and require the owner of the boat to pay for their harbor and all the rest of that stuff. But it doesn't work when you're trying to go after the president. So the basic maxim is, if you wish to engage in these kinds of political prosecution, your case has to be airtight so that the legal theory is so strong that everybody on the other side of the particular case