 He's trained in intelligence, so he knows the potential for disinformation. Is he being set up as a patsy? Of course he knows that. So I'm not arguing for his claims, but I'm saying it appears that he has talked with individuals who have given him names, locations, and dates. He has provided those to the inspector general of the intelligence community. And there are whistleblower provisions now for people to come forward. So it may be that there is a new level of credibility.