During breast augmentation, surgical drainage remains a source of debate. The objective of the study was to determine the interest of the drainage after pre-pectoral breast implants pre, analyzing the risk of hematoma and capsular contracture. We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 400 patients who underwent a first aesthetic breast augmentation by pre-pectoral silicone gel implants. Patients were followed with a maximum of nine years and a minimum of one year. The mean age of patients was 37 years (18-64). Ninety-two percent (368 cases) had no drainage (patients "low risk of bleeding") and 8% (32 cases) underwent a bilateral drainage (patients "high risk of bleeding"). We recorded 1.75% hematoma (7 cases) and 2% of capsular contracture (8 cases).
We believe that the drainage should not be systematic for pre-pectoral breast implants. In patients at high risk of bleeding that we drained, it does not prevent the occurrence of a possible hematoma. In patients at low risk of bleeding that we have not drained, we do not observed more hematoma or capsular contracture than data published for drained patients.
Should we drain after pre-pectoral breast implants?