Datasets:
mteb
/

Modalities:
Tabular
Text
Formats:
json
Libraries:
Datasets
Dask
Muennighoff commited on
Commit
ddc695c
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 63b83f0

Scheduled Commit

Browse files
data/clustering_battle-89f7d27e-df7d-414d-a213-dcd1c0b2f2a2.jsonl ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
 
 
1
+ {"tstamp": 1729986043.322, "task_type": "clustering", "type": "leftvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "31ba97804a4e489d8b96dd9260ca4362", "0_model_name": "voyage-multilingual-2", "0_prompt": ["octagon", "rectangle", "Temple of Artemis", "Colossus of Rhodes", "Statue of Zeus", "Lighthouse of Alexandria", "Hanging Gardens of Babylon", "Pyramids of Giza", "brunette", "black", "blonde", "redhead", "gray", "auburn", "white", "soccer", "basketball", "tennis", "baseball", "cricket", "ruby", "topaz", "diamond"], "0_ncluster": 5, "0_output": "", "0_ndim": "3D (press for 2D)", "0_dim_method": "PCA", "0_clustering_method": "KMeans", "1_conv_id": "b60c7051af954d01b730596ba361e499", "1_model_name": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "1_prompt": ["octagon", "rectangle", "Temple of Artemis", "Colossus of Rhodes", "Statue of Zeus", "Lighthouse of Alexandria", "Hanging Gardens of Babylon", "Pyramids of Giza", "brunette", "black", "blonde", "redhead", "gray", "auburn", "white", "soccer", "basketball", "tennis", "baseball", "cricket", "ruby", "topaz", "diamond"], "1_ncluster": 5, "1_output": "", "1_ndim": "3D (press for 2D)", "1_dim_method": "PCA", "1_clustering_method": "KMeans"}
data/clustering_individual-89f7d27e-df7d-414d-a213-dcd1c0b2f2a2.jsonl CHANGED
@@ -2,3 +2,5 @@
2
  {"tstamp": 1729909151.5841, "task_type": "clustering", "type": "chat", "model": "nomic-ai/nomic-embed-text-v1.5", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1729909093.082, "finish": 1729909151.5841, "ip": "", "conv_id": "d4780833387d4e6f814172ae6331c8d1", "model_name": "nomic-ai/nomic-embed-text-v1.5", "prompt": ["rake", "wheelbarrow", "watering can", "shovel", "pruning shears", "mangrove", "cloud", "temperate", "boreal"], "ncluster": 2, "output": "", "ndim": "3D (press for 2D)", "dim_method": "PCA", "clustering_method": "KMeans"}
3
  {"tstamp": 1729909167.4571, "task_type": "clustering", "type": "chat", "model": "sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1729909167.2259, "finish": 1729909167.4571, "ip": "", "conv_id": "1bb7dcfbb38446a58826ab77e711aeee", "model_name": "sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2", "prompt": ["rake", "wheelbarrow", "watering can", "shovel", "pruning shears", "mangrove", "cloud", "temperate", "boreal"], "ncluster": 2, "output": "", "ndim": "2D (press for 3D)", "dim_method": "PCA", "clustering_method": "KMeans"}
4
  {"tstamp": 1729909167.4571, "task_type": "clustering", "type": "chat", "model": "nomic-ai/nomic-embed-text-v1.5", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1729909167.2259, "finish": 1729909167.4571, "ip": "", "conv_id": "d4780833387d4e6f814172ae6331c8d1", "model_name": "nomic-ai/nomic-embed-text-v1.5", "prompt": ["rake", "wheelbarrow", "watering can", "shovel", "pruning shears", "mangrove", "cloud", "temperate", "boreal"], "ncluster": 2, "output": "", "ndim": "2D (press for 3D)", "dim_method": "PCA", "clustering_method": "KMeans"}
 
 
 
2
  {"tstamp": 1729909151.5841, "task_type": "clustering", "type": "chat", "model": "nomic-ai/nomic-embed-text-v1.5", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1729909093.082, "finish": 1729909151.5841, "ip": "", "conv_id": "d4780833387d4e6f814172ae6331c8d1", "model_name": "nomic-ai/nomic-embed-text-v1.5", "prompt": ["rake", "wheelbarrow", "watering can", "shovel", "pruning shears", "mangrove", "cloud", "temperate", "boreal"], "ncluster": 2, "output": "", "ndim": "3D (press for 2D)", "dim_method": "PCA", "clustering_method": "KMeans"}
3
  {"tstamp": 1729909167.4571, "task_type": "clustering", "type": "chat", "model": "sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1729909167.2259, "finish": 1729909167.4571, "ip": "", "conv_id": "1bb7dcfbb38446a58826ab77e711aeee", "model_name": "sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2", "prompt": ["rake", "wheelbarrow", "watering can", "shovel", "pruning shears", "mangrove", "cloud", "temperate", "boreal"], "ncluster": 2, "output": "", "ndim": "2D (press for 3D)", "dim_method": "PCA", "clustering_method": "KMeans"}
4
  {"tstamp": 1729909167.4571, "task_type": "clustering", "type": "chat", "model": "nomic-ai/nomic-embed-text-v1.5", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1729909167.2259, "finish": 1729909167.4571, "ip": "", "conv_id": "d4780833387d4e6f814172ae6331c8d1", "model_name": "nomic-ai/nomic-embed-text-v1.5", "prompt": ["rake", "wheelbarrow", "watering can", "shovel", "pruning shears", "mangrove", "cloud", "temperate", "boreal"], "ncluster": 2, "output": "", "ndim": "2D (press for 3D)", "dim_method": "PCA", "clustering_method": "KMeans"}
5
+ {"tstamp": 1729985996.313, "task_type": "clustering", "type": "chat", "model": "voyage-multilingual-2", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1729985995.8411, "finish": 1729985996.313, "ip": "", "conv_id": "31ba97804a4e489d8b96dd9260ca4362", "model_name": "voyage-multilingual-2", "prompt": ["octagon", "rectangle", "Temple of Artemis", "Colossus of Rhodes", "Statue of Zeus", "Lighthouse of Alexandria", "Hanging Gardens of Babylon", "Pyramids of Giza", "brunette", "black", "blonde", "redhead", "gray", "auburn", "white", "soccer", "basketball", "tennis", "baseball", "cricket", "ruby", "topaz", "diamond"], "ncluster": 5, "output": "", "ndim": "3D (press for 2D)", "dim_method": "PCA", "clustering_method": "KMeans"}
6
+ {"tstamp": 1729985996.313, "task_type": "clustering", "type": "chat", "model": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1729985995.8411, "finish": 1729985996.313, "ip": "", "conv_id": "b60c7051af954d01b730596ba361e499", "model_name": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "prompt": ["octagon", "rectangle", "Temple of Artemis", "Colossus of Rhodes", "Statue of Zeus", "Lighthouse of Alexandria", "Hanging Gardens of Babylon", "Pyramids of Giza", "brunette", "black", "blonde", "redhead", "gray", "auburn", "white", "soccer", "basketball", "tennis", "baseball", "cricket", "ruby", "topaz", "diamond"], "ncluster": 5, "output": "", "ndim": "3D (press for 2D)", "dim_method": "PCA", "clustering_method": "KMeans"}
data/retrieval_battle-89f7d27e-df7d-414d-a213-dcd1c0b2f2a2.jsonl CHANGED
@@ -13,3 +13,4 @@
13
  {"tstamp": 1729930661.8383, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "bothbadvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "b85dcb802bb2414199a51d08b3ff1cd2", "0_model_name": "BM25", "0_prompt": "what is the difference between template and model?", "0_output": [["what is the difference between template and model?", "Stackoverflow Stackexchange\n\nQ: What's the difference between Yii 2 advanced application and basic? What is the difference between advanced application and basic application in the Yii framework?\nDoes they have any differences regarding security?\n\nA: The following table shows the similarities and differences between the basic and advanced templates:\n\nSource: https://github.com/yiisoft/yii2-app-advanced/blob/master/docs/guide/start-comparison.md\nAs you can see, the main differences are:\n\n\n*\n\n*Advanced template supports front- and back-end apps;\n\n*Advanced template is ready to use User model;\n\n*Advanced template supports user signup and password restore.\n\n"]], "0_corpus": "stackexchange", "1_conv_id": "fe0e9226b05143b694159034deb53910", "1_model_name": "voyage-multilingual-2", "1_prompt": "what is the difference between template and model?", "1_output": [["what is the difference between template and model?", "Stackoverflow Stackexchange\n\nQ: What is the difference between a template class and a class template? What is the difference between a template class and a class template?\n\nA: A template class is related to the Template Method design pattern, while class template is just a \"fill-in-the-blanks\" class template.\n"]], "1_corpus": "stackexchange"}
14
  {"tstamp": 1729969729.854, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "rightvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "a8ab01467128472dbac263eb62916d3d", "0_model_name": "nomic-ai/nomic-embed-text-v1.5", "0_prompt": "importance of continuous and comprehensive evaluation in mathematics", "0_output": [["importance of continuous and comprehensive evaluation in mathematics", "Continuous assessment\n\nContinuous assessment is a form of educational examination that evaluates a student's progress throughout a prescribed course. It is often used as an alternative to the final examination system. Proponents of continuous assessment argue that the approach allows tracking of progress and has a chance of offering students more support, guidance, and opportunities to improve during the course or programme.\nCharacteristics\nComprehensive\nCumulative\nDiagnostic\nFormative\nGuidance-oriented\nSystematic in nature\nAdvantages\nContinuous assessment can help students learn in the following ways:\nContinuous assessment can provide early indications of the performance of students.\nAn increased sense of inclusiveness: Continuous assessment provides students with a constant stream of opportunities to prove their mastery of material and sends the message that everyone can succeed if given enough time and practice. This reduces the anxiety around testing and heightens the emphasis on the learning itself.\nHigher learning standards for all: In a system of continuous assessment, advanced students can progress through material at their own pace and remain engaged by pursuing more challenging work as they master the basics.\nDisadvantages\nGreater study pressure: Unlike the final exam system, students and teachers need to focus throughout a course or programme, as all work counts towards the final grade. This may cause learners to feel more stressed. Under the final exam system, students may \"cram\", or study for long hours, before the test in order to get a good grade. Thus, they only have to work hard for a shorter period."]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "446e6fec0812445da99534a037926574", "1_model_name": "text-embedding-3-large", "1_prompt": "importance of continuous and comprehensive evaluation in mathematics", "1_output": [["importance of continuous and comprehensive evaluation in mathematics", "Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation\n\nContinuous and Comprehensive Evaluation (CCE) was a process of assessment, mandated by the Right to Education Act, of India in 2009. This approach to assessment was introduced by state governments in India, as well as by the Central Board of Secondary Education in India, for students of sixth to tenth grades and twelfth in some schools. It was intended to provide students with practice from a young age for the board exams. In 2017, the CCE system was cancelled for students appearing in the Class 10 Board Exam for 2017–18, bringing back compulsory Annual Board Exam and removing the Formative and Summative Assessments under the Remodeled Assessment Pattern.\nThe Government of Karnataka introduced CCE for grades 1 to 9, and later for 12th grade as well. The main aim of CCE was to evaluate every aspect of the child during their presence at the school. This was believed to help reduce the pressure on the child during/before examinations as the student will have to sit for multiple tests throughout the year, of which no test or the syllabus covered will be repeated at the end of the year, whatsoever. The CCE method was claimed to bring enormous changes from the traditional chalk and talk method of teaching, provided it is implemented accurately."]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"}
15
  {"tstamp": 1729985869.4789, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "leftvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "78cbd5eddd2d4d44aa2024742d857871", "0_model_name": "embed-english-v3.0", "0_prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "0_output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \"Computing Machinery and Intelligence\" while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \"I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \"thinking\" is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \"replace the question by another, which is closely related to it and is expressed in relatively unambiguous words.\" Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \"imitation game\", in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \"Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\" This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \"machines can think\".\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \"mind\", \"understanding\", or \"consciousness\", regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory"]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "7fac78a681d14c5b9ba06cda9ebd543e", "1_model_name": "sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2", "1_prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "1_output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "History of robots\n\nA similar tale can be found in the near contemporary Indian Buddhist Jataka tales, but here the intricacy of the automation does not match that of Master Yan.Prior to the introduction of Buddhism in the Common Era, Chinese philosophers did not seriously consider the distinction between appearance and reality. The Liezi rebuts Buddhist philosophies and likens human creative powers to that of the Creator. The Indian Lokapannatti, a collection of cycles and lores produced in the 11th or 12th century AD, tells the story of how an army of automated soldiers (bhuta vahana yanta or \"Spirit movement machines\") were crafted to protect the relics of Buddha in a secret stupa. The plans for making such humanoid automatons were stolen from the kingdom of Rome, a generic term for the Greco-Roman-Byzantine culture. According to the Lokapannatti, the Yavanas (\"Greek-speakers\") used the automatons to carry out trade and farming, but also captured and executed criminals. Roman automation makers who left the kingdom were pursued and killed by the automatons. According to the Lokapannatti, the emperor Asoka hears the story of the secret stupa and sets out to find it. "]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"}
 
 
13
  {"tstamp": 1729930661.8383, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "bothbadvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "b85dcb802bb2414199a51d08b3ff1cd2", "0_model_name": "BM25", "0_prompt": "what is the difference between template and model?", "0_output": [["what is the difference between template and model?", "Stackoverflow Stackexchange\n\nQ: What's the difference between Yii 2 advanced application and basic? What is the difference between advanced application and basic application in the Yii framework?\nDoes they have any differences regarding security?\n\nA: The following table shows the similarities and differences between the basic and advanced templates:\n\nSource: https://github.com/yiisoft/yii2-app-advanced/blob/master/docs/guide/start-comparison.md\nAs you can see, the main differences are:\n\n\n*\n\n*Advanced template supports front- and back-end apps;\n\n*Advanced template is ready to use User model;\n\n*Advanced template supports user signup and password restore.\n\n"]], "0_corpus": "stackexchange", "1_conv_id": "fe0e9226b05143b694159034deb53910", "1_model_name": "voyage-multilingual-2", "1_prompt": "what is the difference between template and model?", "1_output": [["what is the difference between template and model?", "Stackoverflow Stackexchange\n\nQ: What is the difference between a template class and a class template? What is the difference between a template class and a class template?\n\nA: A template class is related to the Template Method design pattern, while class template is just a \"fill-in-the-blanks\" class template.\n"]], "1_corpus": "stackexchange"}
14
  {"tstamp": 1729969729.854, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "rightvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "a8ab01467128472dbac263eb62916d3d", "0_model_name": "nomic-ai/nomic-embed-text-v1.5", "0_prompt": "importance of continuous and comprehensive evaluation in mathematics", "0_output": [["importance of continuous and comprehensive evaluation in mathematics", "Continuous assessment\n\nContinuous assessment is a form of educational examination that evaluates a student's progress throughout a prescribed course. It is often used as an alternative to the final examination system. Proponents of continuous assessment argue that the approach allows tracking of progress and has a chance of offering students more support, guidance, and opportunities to improve during the course or programme.\nCharacteristics\nComprehensive\nCumulative\nDiagnostic\nFormative\nGuidance-oriented\nSystematic in nature\nAdvantages\nContinuous assessment can help students learn in the following ways:\nContinuous assessment can provide early indications of the performance of students.\nAn increased sense of inclusiveness: Continuous assessment provides students with a constant stream of opportunities to prove their mastery of material and sends the message that everyone can succeed if given enough time and practice. This reduces the anxiety around testing and heightens the emphasis on the learning itself.\nHigher learning standards for all: In a system of continuous assessment, advanced students can progress through material at their own pace and remain engaged by pursuing more challenging work as they master the basics.\nDisadvantages\nGreater study pressure: Unlike the final exam system, students and teachers need to focus throughout a course or programme, as all work counts towards the final grade. This may cause learners to feel more stressed. Under the final exam system, students may \"cram\", or study for long hours, before the test in order to get a good grade. Thus, they only have to work hard for a shorter period."]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "446e6fec0812445da99534a037926574", "1_model_name": "text-embedding-3-large", "1_prompt": "importance of continuous and comprehensive evaluation in mathematics", "1_output": [["importance of continuous and comprehensive evaluation in mathematics", "Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation\n\nContinuous and Comprehensive Evaluation (CCE) was a process of assessment, mandated by the Right to Education Act, of India in 2009. This approach to assessment was introduced by state governments in India, as well as by the Central Board of Secondary Education in India, for students of sixth to tenth grades and twelfth in some schools. It was intended to provide students with practice from a young age for the board exams. In 2017, the CCE system was cancelled for students appearing in the Class 10 Board Exam for 2017–18, bringing back compulsory Annual Board Exam and removing the Formative and Summative Assessments under the Remodeled Assessment Pattern.\nThe Government of Karnataka introduced CCE for grades 1 to 9, and later for 12th grade as well. The main aim of CCE was to evaluate every aspect of the child during their presence at the school. This was believed to help reduce the pressure on the child during/before examinations as the student will have to sit for multiple tests throughout the year, of which no test or the syllabus covered will be repeated at the end of the year, whatsoever. The CCE method was claimed to bring enormous changes from the traditional chalk and talk method of teaching, provided it is implemented accurately."]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"}
15
  {"tstamp": 1729985869.4789, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "leftvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "78cbd5eddd2d4d44aa2024742d857871", "0_model_name": "embed-english-v3.0", "0_prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "0_output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \"Computing Machinery and Intelligence\" while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \"I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \"thinking\" is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \"replace the question by another, which is closely related to it and is expressed in relatively unambiguous words.\" Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \"imitation game\", in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \"Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\" This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \"machines can think\".\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \"mind\", \"understanding\", or \"consciousness\", regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory"]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "7fac78a681d14c5b9ba06cda9ebd543e", "1_model_name": "sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2", "1_prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "1_output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "History of robots\n\nA similar tale can be found in the near contemporary Indian Buddhist Jataka tales, but here the intricacy of the automation does not match that of Master Yan.Prior to the introduction of Buddhism in the Common Era, Chinese philosophers did not seriously consider the distinction between appearance and reality. The Liezi rebuts Buddhist philosophies and likens human creative powers to that of the Creator. The Indian Lokapannatti, a collection of cycles and lores produced in the 11th or 12th century AD, tells the story of how an army of automated soldiers (bhuta vahana yanta or \"Spirit movement machines\") were crafted to protect the relics of Buddha in a secret stupa. The plans for making such humanoid automatons were stolen from the kingdom of Rome, a generic term for the Greco-Roman-Byzantine culture. According to the Lokapannatti, the Yavanas (\"Greek-speakers\") used the automatons to carry out trade and farming, but also captured and executed criminals. Roman automation makers who left the kingdom were pursued and killed by the automatons. According to the Lokapannatti, the emperor Asoka hears the story of the secret stupa and sets out to find it. "]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"}
16
+ {"tstamp": 1729985948.267, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "leftvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "dadff3dec2a74b1289c41bcbfe9e87c7", "0_model_name": "mixedbread-ai/mxbai-embed-large-v1", "0_prompt": "who sang the song tell me something good", "0_output": [["who sang the song tell me something good", "Tell Me Something Good\n\n\"Tell Me Something Good\" is a song by Rufus included on their 1974 album \"Rags to Rufus,\" written by Stevie Wonder and released in 1974. This was the first and only hit credited to Rufus, as once singer Chaka Khan's voice became the focus of the group, they changed their name to \"Rufus featuring Chaka Khan\" for their next album. The single was a hit in the United States, peaking at number three on the Billboard Hot 100 and spent one week at number one on the Cash Box Top 100. It was among the earliest hits to use the guitar talk box, by Tony Maiden.\nProduction\nThe record was produced by the band with Bob Monaco.\nThe song has been described as having \".. rude metallic guitar\" (by Al Ciner) and \".. a beautiful bass, clav and heavy breathing groove.\" The song can be difficult to count as there is an off-count into the verse. The first note is on the \"and of four.\""]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "8adf143f4c67416b85f263915289aa3c", "1_model_name": "voyage-multilingual-2", "1_prompt": "who sang the song tell me something good", "1_output": [["who sang the song tell me something good", "Tell Me Something Good\n\nOn Will & Grace, Karen tells Jack that this is the song to which she and Stan make love. She then walks in on her husband cheating on her with the same song playing. Closed captioning for that episode incorrectly credits the song to Sly and the Family Stone.\nIn That '70s Show, in the episode \"Water Tower\" (June 14, 1999), Eric walks in on his parents having sex to the song and it plays every time he has recurring nightmares and thoughts of his parents. It also plays on his radio.\nRay Romano's character sings in a variation of the song while eating his wife's braciole in the Everybody Loves Raymond season 4 episode 18, \"Debra Makes Something Good\" (February 28, 2000).\nNew York radio station WCBS-FM had a show in the morning named after the song (which was also the theme song). The host told the listeners about a positive true event that happened that day. The Bobby Bones Show also has a segment named after the song.\nThe song is featured in the season 3 finale of Titans. After Dick Grayson, Connor, and Gar Logan defeat Jonathan Crane, Dick calls Barbara Gordon and asks her to “tell him something good.” Bruce Wayne's computer mistakes this request for Dick telling it to play the song, which leads into a montage of the aftermath of the Titans’ heroism."]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"}
data/retrieval_individual-89f7d27e-df7d-414d-a213-dcd1c0b2f2a2.jsonl CHANGED
@@ -66,3 +66,5 @@
66
  {"tstamp": 1729969658.9751, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "text-embedding-3-large", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1729969658.4798, "finish": 1729969658.9751, "ip": "", "conv_id": "446e6fec0812445da99534a037926574", "model_name": "text-embedding-3-large", "prompt": "importance of continuous and comprehensive evaluation in mathematics", "output": [["importance of continuous and comprehensive evaluation in mathematics", "Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation\n\nContinuous and Comprehensive Evaluation (CCE) was a process of assessment, mandated by the Right to Education Act, of India in 2009. This approach to assessment was introduced by state governments in India, as well as by the Central Board of Secondary Education in India, for students of sixth to tenth grades and twelfth in some schools. It was intended to provide students with practice from a young age for the board exams. In 2017, the CCE system was cancelled for students appearing in the Class 10 Board Exam for 2017–18, bringing back compulsory Annual Board Exam and removing the Formative and Summative Assessments under the Remodeled Assessment Pattern.\nThe Government of Karnataka introduced CCE for grades 1 to 9, and later for 12th grade as well. The main aim of CCE was to evaluate every aspect of the child during their presence at the school. This was believed to help reduce the pressure on the child during/before examinations as the student will have to sit for multiple tests throughout the year, of which no test or the syllabus covered will be repeated at the end of the year, whatsoever. The CCE method was claimed to bring enormous changes from the traditional chalk and talk method of teaching, provided it is implemented accurately."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
67
  {"tstamp": 1729985845.6305, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "embed-english-v3.0", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1729985845.242, "finish": 1729985845.6305, "ip": "", "conv_id": "78cbd5eddd2d4d44aa2024742d857871", "model_name": "embed-english-v3.0", "prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \"Computing Machinery and Intelligence\" while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \"I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \"thinking\" is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \"replace the question by another, which is closely related to it and is expressed in relatively unambiguous words.\" Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \"imitation game\", in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \"Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\" This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \"machines can think\".\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \"mind\", \"understanding\", or \"consciousness\", regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory"]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
68
  {"tstamp": 1729985845.6305, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1729985845.242, "finish": 1729985845.6305, "ip": "", "conv_id": "7fac78a681d14c5b9ba06cda9ebd543e", "model_name": "sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2", "prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "History of robots\n\nA similar tale can be found in the near contemporary Indian Buddhist Jataka tales, but here the intricacy of the automation does not match that of Master Yan.Prior to the introduction of Buddhism in the Common Era, Chinese philosophers did not seriously consider the distinction between appearance and reality. The Liezi rebuts Buddhist philosophies and likens human creative powers to that of the Creator. The Indian Lokapannatti, a collection of cycles and lores produced in the 11th or 12th century AD, tells the story of how an army of automated soldiers (bhuta vahana yanta or \"Spirit movement machines\") were crafted to protect the relics of Buddha in a secret stupa. The plans for making such humanoid automatons were stolen from the kingdom of Rome, a generic term for the Greco-Roman-Byzantine culture. According to the Lokapannatti, the Yavanas (\"Greek-speakers\") used the automatons to carry out trade and farming, but also captured and executed criminals. Roman automation makers who left the kingdom were pursued and killed by the automatons. According to the Lokapannatti, the emperor Asoka hears the story of the secret stupa and sets out to find it. "]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
 
 
 
66
  {"tstamp": 1729969658.9751, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "text-embedding-3-large", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1729969658.4798, "finish": 1729969658.9751, "ip": "", "conv_id": "446e6fec0812445da99534a037926574", "model_name": "text-embedding-3-large", "prompt": "importance of continuous and comprehensive evaluation in mathematics", "output": [["importance of continuous and comprehensive evaluation in mathematics", "Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation\n\nContinuous and Comprehensive Evaluation (CCE) was a process of assessment, mandated by the Right to Education Act, of India in 2009. This approach to assessment was introduced by state governments in India, as well as by the Central Board of Secondary Education in India, for students of sixth to tenth grades and twelfth in some schools. It was intended to provide students with practice from a young age for the board exams. In 2017, the CCE system was cancelled for students appearing in the Class 10 Board Exam for 2017–18, bringing back compulsory Annual Board Exam and removing the Formative and Summative Assessments under the Remodeled Assessment Pattern.\nThe Government of Karnataka introduced CCE for grades 1 to 9, and later for 12th grade as well. The main aim of CCE was to evaluate every aspect of the child during their presence at the school. This was believed to help reduce the pressure on the child during/before examinations as the student will have to sit for multiple tests throughout the year, of which no test or the syllabus covered will be repeated at the end of the year, whatsoever. The CCE method was claimed to bring enormous changes from the traditional chalk and talk method of teaching, provided it is implemented accurately."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
67
  {"tstamp": 1729985845.6305, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "embed-english-v3.0", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1729985845.242, "finish": 1729985845.6305, "ip": "", "conv_id": "78cbd5eddd2d4d44aa2024742d857871", "model_name": "embed-english-v3.0", "prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \"Computing Machinery and Intelligence\" while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \"I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \"thinking\" is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \"replace the question by another, which is closely related to it and is expressed in relatively unambiguous words.\" Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \"imitation game\", in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \"Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\" This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \"machines can think\".\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \"mind\", \"understanding\", or \"consciousness\", regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory"]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
68
  {"tstamp": 1729985845.6305, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1729985845.242, "finish": 1729985845.6305, "ip": "", "conv_id": "7fac78a681d14c5b9ba06cda9ebd543e", "model_name": "sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2", "prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "History of robots\n\nA similar tale can be found in the near contemporary Indian Buddhist Jataka tales, but here the intricacy of the automation does not match that of Master Yan.Prior to the introduction of Buddhism in the Common Era, Chinese philosophers did not seriously consider the distinction between appearance and reality. The Liezi rebuts Buddhist philosophies and likens human creative powers to that of the Creator. The Indian Lokapannatti, a collection of cycles and lores produced in the 11th or 12th century AD, tells the story of how an army of automated soldiers (bhuta vahana yanta or \"Spirit movement machines\") were crafted to protect the relics of Buddha in a secret stupa. The plans for making such humanoid automatons were stolen from the kingdom of Rome, a generic term for the Greco-Roman-Byzantine culture. According to the Lokapannatti, the Yavanas (\"Greek-speakers\") used the automatons to carry out trade and farming, but also captured and executed criminals. Roman automation makers who left the kingdom were pursued and killed by the automatons. According to the Lokapannatti, the emperor Asoka hears the story of the secret stupa and sets out to find it. "]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
69
+ {"tstamp": 1729985909.0388, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "mixedbread-ai/mxbai-embed-large-v1", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1729985908.5972, "finish": 1729985909.0388, "ip": "", "conv_id": "dadff3dec2a74b1289c41bcbfe9e87c7", "model_name": "mixedbread-ai/mxbai-embed-large-v1", "prompt": "who sang the song tell me something good", "output": [["who sang the song tell me something good", "Tell Me Something Good\n\n\"Tell Me Something Good\" is a song by Rufus included on their 1974 album \"Rags to Rufus,\" written by Stevie Wonder and released in 1974. This was the first and only hit credited to Rufus, as once singer Chaka Khan's voice became the focus of the group, they changed their name to \"Rufus featuring Chaka Khan\" for their next album. The single was a hit in the United States, peaking at number three on the Billboard Hot 100 and spent one week at number one on the Cash Box Top 100. It was among the earliest hits to use the guitar talk box, by Tony Maiden.\nProduction\nThe record was produced by the band with Bob Monaco.\nThe song has been described as having \".. rude metallic guitar\" (by Al Ciner) and \".. a beautiful bass, clav and heavy breathing groove.\" The song can be difficult to count as there is an off-count into the verse. The first note is on the \"and of four.\""]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
70
+ {"tstamp": 1729985909.0388, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "voyage-multilingual-2", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1729985908.5972, "finish": 1729985909.0388, "ip": "", "conv_id": "8adf143f4c67416b85f263915289aa3c", "model_name": "voyage-multilingual-2", "prompt": "who sang the song tell me something good", "output": [["who sang the song tell me something good", "Tell Me Something Good\n\nOn Will & Grace, Karen tells Jack that this is the song to which she and Stan make love. She then walks in on her husband cheating on her with the same song playing. Closed captioning for that episode incorrectly credits the song to Sly and the Family Stone.\nIn That '70s Show, in the episode \"Water Tower\" (June 14, 1999), Eric walks in on his parents having sex to the song and it plays every time he has recurring nightmares and thoughts of his parents. It also plays on his radio.\nRay Romano's character sings in a variation of the song while eating his wife's braciole in the Everybody Loves Raymond season 4 episode 18, \"Debra Makes Something Good\" (February 28, 2000).\nNew York radio station WCBS-FM had a show in the morning named after the song (which was also the theme song). The host told the listeners about a positive true event that happened that day. The Bobby Bones Show also has a segment named after the song.\nThe song is featured in the season 3 finale of Titans. After Dick Grayson, Connor, and Gar Logan defeat Jonathan Crane, Dick calls Barbara Gordon and asks her to “tell him something good.” Bruce Wayne's computer mistakes this request for Dick telling it to play the song, which leads into a montage of the aftermath of the Titans’ heroism."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}