Scheduled Commit

data/retrieval_individual-8d38bb89-1e1a-471a-8b9e-35c1f784690e.jsonl

@@ -26,3 +26,5 @@
 {"tstamp": 1722362522.4431, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "intfloat/e5-mistral-7b-instruct", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722362522.1102, "finish": 1722362522.4431, "ip": "", "conv_id": "46323c41f9be4245865047b7788ba305", "model_name": "intfloat/e5-mistral-7b-instruct", "prompt": "how many numbers can computer count?", "output": [["how many numbers can computer count?", "Computer number format\n\nThe relation between numbers and bit patterns is chosen for convenience in computer manipulation; eight bytes stored in computer memory may represent a 64-bit real, two 32-bit reals, or four signed or unsigned integers, or some other kind of data that fits into eight bytes. The only difference is how the computer interprets them. If the computer stored four unsigned integers and then read them back from memory as a 64-bit real, it almost always would be a perfectly valid real number, though it would be junk data.\nOnly a finite range of real numbers can be represented with a given number of bits. Arithmetic operations can overflow or underflow, producing a value too large or too small to be represented.\nThe representation has a limited precision. For example, only 15 decimal digits can be represented with a 64-bit real. If a very small floating-point number is added to a large one, the result is just the large one. The small number was too small to even show up in 15 or 16 digits of resolution, and the computer effectively discards it. Analyzing the effect of limited precision is a well-studied problem. Estimates of the magnitude of round-off errors and methods to limit their effect on large calculations are part of any large computation project. The precision limit is different from the range limit, as it affects the significand, not the exponent."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
 {"tstamp": 1722362713.3357, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "jinaai/jina-embeddings-v2-base-en", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722362711.1127, "finish": 1722362713.3357, "ip": "", "conv_id": "311b2013c4ca442a81473006aa78e849", "model_name": "jinaai/jina-embeddings-v2-base-en", "prompt": "how many digits of pi?", "output": [["how many digits of pi?", "Pi\n\nHere, the circumference of a circle is the arc length around the perimeter of the circle, a quantity which can be formally defined independently of geometry using limits—a concept in calculus.  For example, one may directly compute the arc length of the top half of the unit circle, given in Cartesian coordinates by the equation , as the integral:\nAn integral such as this was adopted as the definition of  by Karl Weierstrass, who defined it directly as an integral in 1841.\nIntegration is no longer commonly used in a first analytical definition because, as  explains, differential calculus typically precedes integral calculus in the university curriculum, so it is desirable to have a definition of  that does not rely on the latter.  One such definition, due to Richard Baltzer and popularized by Edmund Landau, is the following:  is twice the smallest positive number at which the cosine function equals 0.  is also the smallest positive number at which the sine function equals zero, and the difference between consecutive zeroes of the sine function. The cosine and sine can be defined independently of geometry as a power series, or as the solution of a differential equation.\nIn a similar spirit,  can be defined using properties of the complex exponential, , of a complex variable . Like the cosine, the complex exponential can be defined in one of several ways. The set of complex numbers at which  is equal to one is then an (imaginary) arithmetic progression of the form:"]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
 {"tstamp": 1722362713.3357, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722362711.1127, "finish": 1722362713.3357, "ip": "", "conv_id": "8d915aba09224216b108ecbf4449a97f", "model_name": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "prompt": "how many digits of pi?", "output": [["how many digits of pi?", "Pi\n\nThe number  (; spelled out as \"pi\") is a mathematical constant that is the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter, approximately equal to 3.14159. The number  appears in many formulae across mathematics and physics. It is an irrational number, meaning that it cannot be expressed exactly as a ratio of two integers, although fractions such as  are commonly used to approximate it. Consequently, its decimal representation never ends, nor enters a permanently repeating pattern. It is a transcendental number, meaning that it cannot be a solution of an equation involving only finite sums, products, powers, and integers. The transcendence of  implies that it is impossible to solve the ancient challenge of squaring the circle with a compass and straightedge. The decimal digits of  appear to be randomly distributed, but no proof of this conjecture has been found."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1722362892.1568, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "jinaai/jina-embeddings-v2-base-en", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722362891.9672, "finish": 1722362892.1568, "ip": "", "conv_id": "94b953499ad2440aa0fc11f41c96e7e6", "model_name": "jinaai/jina-embeddings-v2-base-en", "prompt": "who is the founder of OpenAI", "output": [["who is the founder of OpenAI", "OpenAI\n\nContract with Sama In January 2023, OpenAI has been criticized for outsourcing the annotation of data sets to Sama, a company based in San Francisco but employing workers in Kenya. These annotations were used to train an AI model to detect toxicity, which could then be used to filter out toxic content, notably from ChatGPT's training data and outputs. However, these pieces of text usually contained detailed descriptions of various types of violence, including sexual violence. The four Sama employees interviewed by Time described themselves as mentally scarred. OpenAI paid Sama $12.50 per hour of work, and Sama was redistributing the equivalent of between $1.32 and $2.00 per hour post-tax to its annotators. Sama's spokesperson said that the $12.50 was also covering other implicit costs, among which were infrastructure expenses, quality assurance and management.\nLack of transparency\nIn March 2023, the company was also criticized for disclosing particularly few technical details about products like GPT-4, contradicting its initial commitment to openness and making it harder for independent researchers to replicate its work and develop safeguards. OpenAI cited competitiveness and safety concerns to justify this strategic turn. OpenAI's former chief scientist Ilya Sutskever argued in 2023 that open-sourcing increasingly capable models was increasingly risky, and that the safety reasons for not open-sourcing the most potent AI models would become \"obvious\" in a few years.\nNon-disparagement agreement\nOn May 17, 2024, a Vox article reported that OpenAI was asking departing employees to sign a lifelong non-disparagement agreement forbidding them from criticizing OpenAI or acknowledging the existence of the agreement. Daniel Kokotajlo, a former employee, publicly stated that he forfeited his vested equity in OpenAI in order to leave without signing the agreement. Sam Altman stated that he was unaware of the equity cancellation provision, and that OpenAI never enforced it to cancel any employee's vested equity. Vox published leaked documents and emails challenging this claim. On May 23, 2024, OpenAI sent a memo releasing former employees from the agreement."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1722362892.1568, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1722362891.9672, "finish": 1722362892.1568, "ip": "", "conv_id": "331fde02b308466c8a4c482e91005684", "model_name": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "prompt": "who is the founder of OpenAI", "output": [["who is the founder of OpenAI", "OpenAI\n\n2015–2018: Non-profit beginnings In December 2015, OpenAI was founded by Sam Altman, Elon Musk, Ilya Sutskever, Greg Brockman, Trevor Blackwell, Vicki Cheung, Andrej Karpathy, Durk Kingma, John Schulman, Pamela Vagata, and Wojciech Zaremba, with Sam Altman and Elon Musk as the co-chairs. $1 billion in total was pledged by Sam Altman, Greg Brockman, Elon Musk, Reid Hoffman, Jessica Livingston, Peter Thiel, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Infosys, and YC Research. The actual collected total amount of contributions was only $130 million until 2019. According to an investigation led by TechCrunch, Musk was its largest donor while YC Research did not contribute anything at all. The organization stated it would \"freely collaborate\" with other institutions and researchers by making its patents and research open to the public. OpenAI was headquartered at the Pioneer Building in the Mission District, San Francisco.\nAccording to Wired, Brockman met with Yoshua Bengio, one of the \"founding fathers\" of deep learning, and drew up a list of the \"best researchers in the field\". Brockman was able to hire nine of them as the first employees in December 2015. In 2016, OpenAI paid corporate-level (rather than nonprofit-level) salaries, but did not pay AI researchers salaries comparable to those of Facebook or Google."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}

data/retrieval_side_by_side-8d38bb89-1e1a-471a-8b9e-35c1f784690e.jsonl

@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 {"tstamp": 1722362878.6442, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "rightvote", "models": ["jinaai/jina-embeddings-v2-base-en", "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5"], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "311b2013c4ca442a81473006aa78e849", "0_model_name": "jinaai/jina-embeddings-v2-base-en", "0_prompt": "how many digits of pi?", "0_output": [["how many digits of pi?", "Pi\n\nHere, the circumference of a circle is the arc length around the perimeter of the circle, a quantity which can be formally defined independently of geometry using limits—a concept in calculus.  For example, one may directly compute the arc length of the top half of the unit circle, given in Cartesian coordinates by the equation , as the integral:\nAn integral such as this was adopted as the definition of  by Karl Weierstrass, who defined it directly as an integral in 1841.\nIntegration is no longer commonly used in a first analytical definition because, as  explains, differential calculus typically precedes integral calculus in the university curriculum, so it is desirable to have a definition of  that does not rely on the latter.  One such definition, due to Richard Baltzer and popularized by Edmund Landau, is the following:  is twice the smallest positive number at which the cosine function equals 0.  is also the smallest positive number at which the sine function equals zero, and the difference between consecutive zeroes of the sine function. The cosine and sine can be defined independently of geometry as a power series, or as the solution of a differential equation.\nIn a similar spirit,  can be defined using properties of the complex exponential, , of a complex variable . Like the cosine, the complex exponential can be defined in one of several ways. The set of complex numbers at which  is equal to one is then an (imaginary) arithmetic progression of the form:"]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "8d915aba09224216b108ecbf4449a97f", "1_model_name": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "1_prompt": "how many digits of pi?", "1_output": [["how many digits of pi?", "Pi\n\nThe number  (; spelled out as \"pi\") is a mathematical constant that is the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter, approximately equal to 3.14159. The number  appears in many formulae across mathematics and physics. It is an irrational number, meaning that it cannot be expressed exactly as a ratio of two integers, although fractions such as  are commonly used to approximate it. Consequently, its decimal representation never ends, nor enters a permanently repeating pattern. It is a transcendental number, meaning that it cannot be a solution of an equation involving only finite sums, products, powers, and integers. The transcendence of  implies that it is impossible to solve the ancient challenge of squaring the circle with a compass and straightedge. The decimal digits of  appear to be randomly distributed, but no proof of this conjecture has been found."]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1722362916.7139, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "rightvote", "models": ["jinaai/jina-embeddings-v2-base-en", "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5"], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "94b953499ad2440aa0fc11f41c96e7e6", "0_model_name": "jinaai/jina-embeddings-v2-base-en", "0_prompt": "who is the founder of OpenAI", "0_output": [["who is the founder of OpenAI", "OpenAI\n\nContract with Sama In January 2023, OpenAI has been criticized for outsourcing the annotation of data sets to Sama, a company based in San Francisco but employing workers in Kenya. These annotations were used to train an AI model to detect toxicity, which could then be used to filter out toxic content, notably from ChatGPT's training data and outputs. However, these pieces of text usually contained detailed descriptions of various types of violence, including sexual violence. The four Sama employees interviewed by Time described themselves as mentally scarred. OpenAI paid Sama $12.50 per hour of work, and Sama was redistributing the equivalent of between $1.32 and $2.00 per hour post-tax to its annotators. Sama's spokesperson said that the $12.50 was also covering other implicit costs, among which were infrastructure expenses, quality assurance and management.\nLack of transparency\nIn March 2023, the company was also criticized for disclosing particularly few technical details about products like GPT-4, contradicting its initial commitment to openness and making it harder for independent researchers to replicate its work and develop safeguards. OpenAI cited competitiveness and safety concerns to justify this strategic turn. OpenAI's former chief scientist Ilya Sutskever argued in 2023 that open-sourcing increasingly capable models was increasingly risky, and that the safety reasons for not open-sourcing the most potent AI models would become \"obvious\" in a few years.\nNon-disparagement agreement\nOn May 17, 2024, a Vox article reported that OpenAI was asking departing employees to sign a lifelong non-disparagement agreement forbidding them from criticizing OpenAI or acknowledging the existence of the agreement. Daniel Kokotajlo, a former employee, publicly stated that he forfeited his vested equity in OpenAI in order to leave without signing the agreement. Sam Altman stated that he was unaware of the equity cancellation provision, and that OpenAI never enforced it to cancel any employee's vested equity. Vox published leaked documents and emails challenging this claim. On May 23, 2024, OpenAI sent a memo releasing former employees from the agreement."]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "331fde02b308466c8a4c482e91005684", "1_model_name": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "1_prompt": "who is the founder of OpenAI", "1_output": [["who is the founder of OpenAI", "OpenAI\n\n2015–2018: Non-profit beginnings In December 2015, OpenAI was founded by Sam Altman, Elon Musk, Ilya Sutskever, Greg Brockman, Trevor Blackwell, Vicki Cheung, Andrej Karpathy, Durk Kingma, John Schulman, Pamela Vagata, and Wojciech Zaremba, with Sam Altman and Elon Musk as the co-chairs. $1 billion in total was pledged by Sam Altman, Greg Brockman, Elon Musk, Reid Hoffman, Jessica Livingston, Peter Thiel, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Infosys, and YC Research. The actual collected total amount of contributions was only $130 million until 2019. According to an investigation led by TechCrunch, Musk was its largest donor while YC Research did not contribute anything at all. The organization stated it would \"freely collaborate\" with other institutions and researchers by making its patents and research open to the public. OpenAI was headquartered at the Pioneer Building in the Mission District, San Francisco.\nAccording to Wired, Brockman met with Yoshua Bengio, one of the \"founding fathers\" of deep learning, and drew up a list of the \"best researchers in the field\". Brockman was able to hire nine of them as the first employees in December 2015. In 2016, OpenAI paid corporate-level (rather than nonprofit-level) salaries, but did not pay AI researchers salaries comparable to those of Facebook or Google."]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"}