TPK445: Hi, again. :)  Agree to disagree? Maybe it's just in the semantics. If I use the terms respecters or breakers of the law, it makes it clearer for me. Even if it becomes necessary, they would still be breaking the law (were there a law.) Some people would put up with a lot before they went that far, to voluntarily breaking the law. It's a shame a lot of others don't recognize the law as law, period. Agree with you, though, about the value of such a ban. Thanks for responding.