The kid resisted arrest. The police warned him repeatedly; he asserted that he was right. But the cops, past a basic assesment, don't decide whether he's right. That, per the 6th Amendment, is the job of a jury. He had chances to be civil; he refused, instead trying to make his case to a non-existent court. I like what he had to say, and I don't agree with removing him, but he should have fought his battle somewhere else. Instead, he got the (admittedly draconian) result he was warned about.