The first judgment of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union: a revision of legacy and a temptation challenge
The author critically assesses the first judgment of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) on the Tarasik case concerning the omission of the Eurasian Commission. An approach chosen by the EAEU Court is compared with approaches used by the Court of Justice of the European Union and the Court of the Eurasian Economic Community in similar cases. The author argues that the judgment of the EAEU Court and its arguments seem to be more realistic than the extremely tough and rigid position of the Court of the Eurasian Community. Actually, the EAEU Court’s approach is more in line with a required level of cooperation between the Court and the Commission that aim at setting a control over the EAEU members’ commitments.