Key conditions for the balance of interests of the debtor and creditors in the settlement of insolvency in the procedures of prevention, preservation and rehabilitation: the experience of Russia and France
The institution of insolvency is like "a skeleton in its vulnerability, fragility, significance and versatility of functionality and the significance of its effect on the health of the organism as a whole: any recklessly added or removed bone, cartilage or ligament will make the whole organism suffer". Their full description is impossible without a brief and meaningful overview of insolvency prevention methods, since it is they that make it possible to assess the debtor's behavior before the opening of rehabilitation procedures. Depending on the competitive structure of the market, the actor of which is the debtor, and the type of insolvency, it is possible to distinguish procedures that will differ from each other in the scope of powers of the administrators of the procedure, the procedure for determining their remuneration, the distribution of the burden of proof for tort claims from aggressive countering and bringing to insolvency, the availability of the institution of extending the procedure for resolving insolvency to other property masses, the procedure for selling certain types of property, drawing up and executing a rehabilitation plan. This article will partially describe the different elements of a common structure for rehabilitation and preservation, indicating the features that arise in the resolution of certain types of insolvency. Rehabilitation and preservation are classified as judicial (collective) methods of resolution of insolvency, preventive as pre-trial.