COMPARISON OF REFLEXIVE PASSIVE CONSTRUCTIONS IN GERMAN AND TAJIK LANGUAGES
This article says that the idea of the correlation of repayment with the liability in the modern German language was expressed by many linguists. However, regarding what reflexive constructions can be considered closely to the value of the liability, the most varied points of view were expressed in linguistics, because with the help of the return form, various shades of action can be transmitted, from the active action performed by the subject in relation to himself, to the state caused by an extraneous cause. The convergence of reflective constructions with the grammatical category of the passive voice is indicated, for example, by A. M. Gorlatov. However, he does not speak of their complete identity, since “the value of reflexive constructions can be determined to a greater extent by the nature of the subject and the conditions of the context”. In his work A. M. Gorlatov suggests naming modern German reflective constructions language, able to be considered in comparison with the passive, as "Reciprocating design". To such constructions with sich, called reflexive forms or reciprocating constructions, traditionally carry utterances, mainly with evaluative determinants, which are divided into three groups: 1) constructions with sich + active verb with an inactive subject; 2) impersonal constructions with sich or sich lassen; 3) designs with sich + lassen + Infinitiv. When characterizing these structures use different terms: passivisches Reflexiv (G. Brinkmann), Reflexiv-Passiv (K. Brinker), active constructions with passive pronouns (EI Shendels). Usually all of the above groups belong to the periphery of the passivity field.