An experience ofperforming spirometry by trained general practitioners
The article discusses the experience of teaching and conducting spirometry of general practitioners as part of the RESPECT study (RESearch on the PrEvalence and the diagnosis of COPD and its Tobacco-related aetiology). A total of 33 trained in spirometry general practitioners performed a study of 3119 patients. Quality criteria met 84.1% of spirometric studies. The analysis of the most common mistakes made by doctors during the forced expiratory maneuver is included. The most frequent errors were expiration exhalation of less than 6 s (54%), non-maximal effort throughout the test and lack of reproducibility (11.3%). independent predictors of poor spirogram quality were male gender, obstruction (FEV}/FVC<0.7), and the center where the study was performed. The number of good-quality spirograms ranged from 96.1% (95% Ci 83.2-110.4) to 59.8% (95% Ci 49.6-71.4) depending on the center. Subsequently, an analysis of the reasons behind the poor quality of research in individual centers was conducted and the identified shortcomings were eliminated. The poor quality of the spirograms was associated either with the errors of the doctors who undertook the study or with the technical malfunctions of the spirometer.