MYTHOGONY, OR THE ABILITY TO DISBELIEVE
The article examines faith, taken in the mode of unbelief, in relation to modern philosophies of immanence (J. Deleuze, M. Henry, A. Badiou, F. Laruelle). The thought that determines this study is that the only basis for recognizing the significance of transcending is its very implementation by faith, while philosophical or practical, including scientific, its refutation, like assertion, contradicts its essence. The philosophies of immanence, insofar as they deny the transcendent conceptually, that is, without relying on the faith that defines them, which they deny or do not see, commonly identifying all faith with certainty, fall into the category of mythological philosophies, that is, those that explicitly or implicitly affirm this or that theory of myth and push into the realm of the mythical beliefs and speculations that contradict them. But the philosophies that affirm the transcendent conceptualize it in exactly the same way, ending up just as mythological in the end. The mythogonic approach proposed in the article, based on the idea of Kantian Criticism, is aimed at revealing the faith that determines the philosophical myth generation, and the essence of the transcendence produced by it, which realizes the absolute existential positing that caused it beyond any conceptualization.