Armed rebellion: issues of improving the corpus delicti
The article examines the shortcomings of the technique for constructing the composition of an armed rebellion. The authors analyze the attribute «armed» and the term «active» participation. The author criticizes the proposal to differentiate responsibility for organizing an armed rebellion and participation in it, as well as the legislator’s approach to identifying independent members of the organization, complicity, and incitement to criminal acts. The thesis is put forward on the borrowing of the legislative provisions of some countries of the post-soviet space in terms of determining the objective side of an armed rebellion, as well as on the extension of the effect of the footnote to art. 275 at art. 279 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.