COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF EXISTING METHODS FOR DEVELOPING CORRESPONDENCE MATRICES
The study is aimed at comparing the methods of restoring correspondence matrices, the traditional transport school and modern mobile technologies. Traditionally, correspondence matrices are restored by interviewing vehicle drivers and applying gravity models (to extrapolate and fill in unobserved movements), then matrix estimation methods are used to calculate traffic flows. Each of these approaches has a number of advantages and disadvantages, but there is no evidence to assess the quality of the data obtained.