THE PROBLEM OF SIGN`S MODEL AND MEANING IN THE SEMIOTICS OF ARCHITECTURE OF YURIY SOMOV
Some of the main aspects the semiotics of architecture of Russian scientist Y. Somov was analyzed in the given article. The author`s aim is to shows explanation of constituent components of different models of sign, possibility their assimilation, nature of understanding problem of meaning within model of sign of Ch. Pierce from the point of view Y. Somov. The examples of using model of sign in practice are suggested the questions too. The study begins through comparative analyses different models of sign: G. Frege, C. K. Ogden, I. A. Richards and F. de. Saussure. The author pays special attention on Y. Somov`s subjective understanding of character of signifier and signified in the Saussure`s model of sign. The author of article considers that the models of sign of G. Frege, C. K. Ogden, I. A. Richards cannot be reduced to the model of sign of F. de. Saussure. The certain parallel lines can be between the models of sign G. Frege and C. K. Ogden, I. A. Richards. The due to understanding of representamen as means of translation of information the signifier can be assimilated to one. It allows possibility reducing the models of signs of F. de Saussure, Ch. Pierce to each other. It allows understanding the signified as the interpretant too. The problem of meaning of Y. Somov closely connected with the model of sign of Ch. Pierce. The Russian scientist considers that meaning is created both within representamen- interpetant relationship and representamen-representamen, representamem- object ones. However this point of view leads to the destroying clear differentiation of elements of sign when primary integrity of sign and the thirdness structure of sign are broken. The interpretant, as very important component of sign`s structure, is eliminated. It causes considerable difficulties in disclosing problem of meaning.