Sep 29, 2016 ... But wasn't stop-and-frisk ruled unconstitutional in New York City, asked  moderator Lester Holt. “No, you're wrong,” Trump responded.
Sep 27, 2016 ... Lester Holt asserted in an exchange with Donald Trump that New York's  controversial ... “Stop-and-frisk was ruled unconstitutional in New York because it  largely singled out black and ... “No, you're wrong,” Trump responded.
Sep 27, 2016 ... A back-and-forth about controversial "stop and frisk" law ... asserting that a  controversial “stop and frisk” policy used in New York City would ... Trump  primarily referenced the use of stop and frisk in New York City, ... No, you're  wrong. ... The policy was indeed ruled unconstitutional in 2013 (the female judge  ...
Sep 22, 2016 ... You're all set! ... A federal judge ruled that the way New York police practiced the  tactic ... practice of stopping and frisking civilians is not unconstitutional, and ...  The number of stops recorded by New York police increased from ... "To say that  stop-and-frisk is the reason crime went down is wrong," said ...
Sep 27, 2016 ... When Holt responded that “stop and frisk was ruled unconstitutional in New ...  and Hispanic young men,” Trump snapped back, “No, you're wrong. ... And that's  true without even getting into the fact that contrary to Trump's assertions, the ...  was to bring back the widely reviled New York twist on stop and frisk ...
Says "no, you’re wrong," responding to the assertion that stop-and-frisk was ruled unconstitutional in New York.