text
⚖️ 𝐀𝐈 𝐓𝐫𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐢𝐬 𝐂𝐨𝐩𝐲𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐈𝐧𝐟𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭
⚖️ 𝐀𝐈 𝐓𝐫𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐢𝐬 𝐂𝐨𝐩𝐲𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐈𝐧𝐟𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭
new_line
new_line
text
This bold claim is not my opinion, but it has been made in a recent "report" of a group, whose stance is recognizable in their name. It is roughly translated as "Authors' Rights Initiative". They published a report which was also presented before the EU Parliament according to the LinkedIn post below.
This bold claim is not my opinion, but it has been made in a recent "report" of a group, whose stance is recognizable in their name. It is roughly translated as "Authors' Rights Initiative". They published a report which was also presented before the EU Parliament according to the LinkedIn post below.
new_line
new_line
text
I am not really interested in politics, but as an EU citizen I am of course somewhat interested in a reasonable and practical version of the EU AI Act. Not saying there should not be rules around data and AI, but this report is obviously very biased towards one side.
I am not really interested in politics, but as an EU citizen I am of course somewhat interested in a reasonable and practical version of the EU AI Act. Not saying there should not be rules around data and AI, but this report is obviously very biased towards one side.
new_line
new_line
text
While I think the report itself does not deserve attention, I post it in the hope that you find more examples, where they did not address the issue adequately. Feel free to add to my LinkedIn posts (where the original authors will see it) or here.
While I think the report itself does not deserve attention, I post it in the hope that you find more examples, where they did not address the issue adequately. Feel free to add to my LinkedIn posts (where the original authors will see it) or here.
new_line
new_line
text
[en] Executive summary: 
[en] Executive summary: 
link
https://urheber.info/media/pages/diskurs/ai-training-is-copyright-infringement/3b900058e6-1725460935/executive-summary_engl_final_29-08-2024.pdf
https://urheber.info/media/pages/diskurs/ai-training-is-copyright-infringement/3b900058e6-1725460935/executive-summary_engl_final_29-08-2024.pdf
new_line
text
[de] Full report: 
[de] Full report: 
link
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4946214
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4946214
new_line
new_line
text
LinkedIn: 
LinkedIn: 
link
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/activity-7238912869268959232-6cFx
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/activity-7238912869268959232-6cFx
new_line
new_line
⚖️ 𝐀𝐈 𝐓𝐫𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐢𝐬 𝐂𝐨𝐩𝐲𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐈𝐧𝐟𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭

This bold claim is not my opinion, but it has been made in a recent "report" of a group, whose stance is recognizable in their name. It is roughly translated as "Authors' Rights Initiative". They published a report which was also presented before the EU Parliament according to the LinkedIn post below.

I am not really interested in politics, but as an EU citizen I am of course somewhat interested in a reasonable and practical version of the EU AI Act. Not saying there should not be rules around data and AI, but this report is obviously very biased towards one side.

While I think the report itself does not deserve attention, I post it in the hope that you find more examples, where they did not address the issue adequately. Feel free to add to my LinkedIn posts (where the original authors will see it) or here.

[en] Executive summary: https://urheber.info/media/pages/diskurs/ai-training-is-copyright-infringement/3b900058e6-1725460935/executive-summary_engl_final_29-08-2024.pdf
[de] Full report: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4946214

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/activity-7238912869268959232-6cFx


👀
John6666