text
1 hour of OpenAi o1, here are my thoughts...
1 hour of OpenAi o1, here are my thoughts...
new_line
new_line
text
Here are my few observations:
Here are my few observations:
new_line
new_line
text
- Slower response times: o1 can take over 10+ seconds to answer some questions, as it spends more time "thinking" through problems. In my case, it took over 50 seconds.
- Slower response times: o1 can take over 10+ seconds to answer some questions, as it spends more time "thinking" through problems. In my case, it took over 50 seconds.
new_line
new_line
text
- Less likely to admit ignorance: The models are reported to be less likely to admit when they don't know the answer to a question.
- Less likely to admit ignorance: The models are reported to be less likely to admit when they don't know the answer to a question.
new_line
new_line
text
- Higher pricing: o1-preview is significantly more expensive than GPT-4o, costing 3x more for input tokens and 4x more for output tokens in the API. With more thinking and more tokens, this could require houses to be mortgaged!
- Higher pricing: o1-preview is significantly more expensive than GPT-4o, costing 3x more for input tokens and 4x more for output tokens in the API. With more thinking and more tokens, this could require houses to be mortgaged!
new_line
new_line
text
- Do we need this?: While it's better than GPT-4o for complex reasoning, on many common business tasks, its performance is just equivalent.
- Do we need this?: While it's better than GPT-4o for complex reasoning, on many common business tasks, its performance is just equivalent.
new_line
new_line
text
- Not a big deal: No comparisons to Anthropic or Google DeepMind Gemini are mentioned or included.
- Not a big deal: No comparisons to Anthropic or Google DeepMind Gemini are mentioned or included.
new_line
new_line
text
- This model tries to think and iterate over the response on its own! Think of it as an inbuilt CoT on steroids! Would love a technical review paper on the training process.
- This model tries to think and iterate over the response on its own! Think of it as an inbuilt CoT on steroids! Would love a technical review paper on the training process.
new_line
new_line
text
A must-read paper: 
A must-read paper: 
link
https://cdn.openai.com/o1-system-card.pdf
https://cdn.openai.com/o1-system-card.pdf
1 hour of OpenAi o1, here are my thoughts...

Here are my few observations:

- Slower response times: o1 can take over 10+ seconds to answer some questions, as it spends more time "thinking" through problems. In my case, it took over 50 seconds.

- Less likely to admit ignorance: The models are reported to be less likely to admit when they don't know the answer to a question.

- Higher pricing: o1-preview is significantly more expensive than GPT-4o, costing 3x more for input tokens and 4x more for output tokens in the API. With more thinking and more tokens, this could require houses to be mortgaged!

- Do we need this?: While it's better than GPT-4o for complex reasoning, on many common business tasks, its performance is just equivalent.

- Not a big deal: No comparisons to Anthropic or Google DeepMind Gemini are mentioned or included.

- This model tries to think and iterate over the response on its own! Think of it as an inbuilt CoT on steroids! Would love a technical review paper on the training process.

A must-read paper: https://cdn.openai.com/o1-system-card.pdf
👀
John6666 createtheimaginable sitloboi2012 louisbrulenaudet
👍
CoolSpot rbn2008k