text
llm-jp-eval is currently one of the most widely used benchmarks for Japanese LLMs and is half of WandB's comprehensive Nejumi LLM Leaderboard scoring. I was seeing some weirdness in results I was getting and ended up in a bit of a rabbit hole. Here's my article on evaling llm-jp-eval: 
llm-jp-eval is currently one of the most widely used benchmarks for Japanese LLMs and is half of WandB's comprehensive Nejumi LLM Leaderboard scoring. I was seeing some weirdness in results I was getting and ended up in a bit of a rabbit hole. Here's my article on evaling llm-jp-eval: 
link
https://huggingface.co/blog/leonardlin/llm-jp-eval-eval
https://huggingface.co/blog/leonardlin/llm-jp-eval-eval
new_line
new_line
text
I've setup a fork of Lightblue's Shaberi testing framework which uses LLM-as-a-Judge style benchmarks as something probably more representative of real world LLM strength in Japanese. Here's how the new base model ablations are looking:
I've setup a fork of Lightblue's Shaberi testing framework which uses LLM-as-a-Judge style benchmarks as something probably more representative of real world LLM strength in Japanese. Here's how the new base model ablations are looking:
new_line
llm-jp-eval is currently one of the most widely used benchmarks for Japanese LLMs and is half of WandB's comprehensive Nejumi LLM Leaderboard scoring. I was seeing some weirdness in results I was getting and ended up in a bit of a rabbit hole. Here's my article on evaling llm-jp-eval: https://huggingface.co/blog/leonardlin/llm-jp-eval-eval

I've setup a fork of Lightblue's Shaberi testing framework which uses LLM-as-a-Judge style benchmarks as something probably more representative of real world LLM strength in Japanese. Here's how the new base model ablations are looking:

👍
kaisugi DynaTechSystems
❤️
afrideva