This is a good looking watch, and is very reasonably priced. I particularly like the white dial and the shape of the hour markers (reminiscent of the Rolex Submariner). The dial is a decent size and quite readable. The watch is very thin and light, and the band is supple. Casio has several versions of this watch with different color schemes. I wish they had a solar or 10-year battery version, even if it cost $10-20 more, to avoid replacing the battery every 3 years or so, and possibly compromising the water seal. They don't seem to have solar versions of any of their cheaper dive watches.

My first sample of this watch had a badly misaligned second hand that ticked midway between the dial markers (off by 1/2 second, the maximum error possible). I thought surely this must be a sample defect, so I requested a replacement, but it was misaligned exactly the same way (by 1/2 second), so I sent both of them back. Either the watches are getting knocked out of alignment in shipping or Casio needs to improve their quality control. At least the day/date indicators were perfectly aligned on both samples. The second hand on my 1994 Casio ARW-320 watch is almost perfectly aligned, which is what I expected from Casio on this new watch. Second hand misalignment is a common issue with quartz watches, most of which move the second hand in discrete 1 second ticks (rather than in smaller ticks as with a self-winding watch). It's something that bothers me, especially if it ticks exactly between the dial markers, so it can't be determined which dial marker the second hand is pointing to. I know many people don't care about such misalignment.

If you're not concerned with second hand misalignment, or you get a sample with good alignment, then you really can't go wrong with this watch for the price. I may try another sample in the future to see if I can get one that's better aligned.