First the good stuff:  These are very comfortable until they have fallen down below one's waist.

Here's the weird stuff:  These are supposedly made for men but they don't have a fly.  This wouldn't be so bad but for the fact that they also have a drawstring.  Here's what makes this a problem:  The clingy, comfortable, fit of these underpants causes them to be pulled down by the motion of one's legs taking one's trousers with them thus requiring that one continually hike up one's pants.....not tightening the drawstring exacerbates the problem, tightening it makes it difficult to pull down the waistband in order to micturate, which is difficult to do through the fly of one's trousers (in other words, to do it right one must unfasten his belt and the waistband and fly of his outergarment and then undo the drawstring so that one can comfortably pull them down below one's privates, making the simple act of micturation a genuine hassle.

What were the designers thinking?  Also, the name brand silk-screened on the outside of the pant toward the left ankle is an annoyance.  I paid for these, I don't want to do free advertising for a substandard product, or any product unwillingly.  Besides, what right-minded non-pervert wants to advertise their underwear brand?

I rate these two stars for their barmy design and vulgar commercialism and temporary comfort (uncomfortable as soon as they work themselves down below one's waist).