<div id="video-block-RE1WKGLUGEQXC" class="a-section a-spacing-small a-spacing-top-mini video-block"></div><input type="hidden" name="" value="https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/C1lzA5EfRBS.mp4" class="video-url"><input type="hidden" name="" value="https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51aJC%2BHQzeS.png" class="video-slate-img-url">&nbsp;Maybe it's nostalgia, maybe it's that I got tired of carrying a cell phone but I really wanted to start wearing a watch again.  So when I got a chance to review an Invicta I jumped at the opportunity.  It was like taking a time machine back to 1992, and I'm liking it.

I have to admit I was surprised by the size of this watch.  The watch face is literally almost an inch and a half wide with striking primary red and blue hands.  It is bold and classi; elegant and visually clean, very tasteful and simple.

I'm split on whether the size is a good or bad thing.  My co-worked joked that it was obviously meant for use with the visually impaired but I like the boldness of size.  The band has taken a bit to get used to after going watchless for a decade, but it seems to be working out well. It is definitely a man's man's watch based on size.

The additional bands are also boldly colored, especially the blue.  I love that they embedded the pins into the bands as I have lost a pin before and could not longer use that watch. The action of the time setting dial is smooth as butter. The ticking is faint but solidly watch like.  I like it.