The setting is beautiful. Solid, believable, but not perfect. The thing I don't like about it is the bevel itself is too thick (someone else agrees) and the stone sits BELOW the bezel (see photo), which is a jewelry no-no. So even though the setting is nice, the probable reason either the setting is too high or the stone is smaller than it should be for the setting. Take a look at the photo, and compare it to a bezel setting where the stone is properly set. Due to this, it DOES look like a button as someone else said. But the absolute worst thing is this cheapand I mean CHEAPstone they used. Considering its an open bezel on the bottom, it should shine and sparkle like nobodys business. I have been buying loose CZ stones for years. For $5 you can get an absolutely gorgeous brilliant stone. This is very lacking. Very white, no depth. Maybe they changed suppliers and the stone used to be better. No more. What a shame. I thought it would be the perfect ring Ive been looking for, and its definitely not. BTW, I got a size 5 and its a very generous size 5, i.e., its a 5.5, so it leads me to believe they are not sized appropriately and use Asian or European sizing.

What made me chuckle were the comments about the size of the CZ. Two carats is not believable? Are you kidding me? When you're 20, maybe thats true unless you're marrying someone successful. But over the age of 35, MINIMUM of 2 carats is a MUST. Over 50? 3 carats. Dont sell yourself short!