BCC
#Thank you, Brian.
Good morning, everyone.
I'd like to welcome you to Boise Cascade's second-quarter 2016 earnings call and business update.
Joining me on today's call are <UNK> <UNK>, our CEO; <UNK> <UNK>, head of our Wood Products operations; and <UNK> <UNK>, head of our building materials distribution operations.
Turning to slide 2, I'd point out the information regarding our forward-looking statements.
The appendix of the presentation includes reconciliations from our GAAP net income to EBITDA.
And with that, I will turn the call over to <UNK> <UNK>.
Thanks, <UNK>.
Good morning, everyone.
Thank you for joining us for our earnings call today.
I'm on slide 3 right now.
Our second-quarter sales of $1.04 billion were up 9% from second-quarter 2015 as a result of growth in engineered wood products and our distribution business.
Our net income of $19.2 million was down 5% from second-quarter 2015.
Wood Products reported segment income of $16.3 million in the quarter or EBITDA of $31.1 million.
The team in Wood Products did an outstanding job during the quarter of managing the integration of the recently acquired EWP facilities in Alabama and North Carolina.
The acquisition was essentially neutral to EPS in the second quarter.
Wood Products made a number of operating changes during the quarter to increase the proportion of internally produced veneer used in EWP and to reduce our plywood production in response to market conditions.
In addition, we have seen good progress on a number of actions to improve efficiencies and control costs while we combat the current weakness in plywood and lumber pricing.
Building Materials Distribution reported segment income of $29.1 million or EBITDA of $32.5 million.
BMD took full advantage of the seasonal uptick in demand for all products and customer segments.
The modest favorable pricing trends on key commodities like OSB and lumber and a good mix of general-line products contributed to the impressive gross margin performance in the quarter.
Touching briefly on capital allocation, Wood Products is finishing up the major dryer project at our Florien, Louisiana, veneer and plywood operation, which will reduce operating costs and provide additional internal veneer production capabilities.
Our spending related to recommissioning LVL production at the recently acquired Roxboro, North Carolina, EWP facility is underway.
And we expect to have LVL shipments from Roxboro to customers late in the third quarter.
We have also completed a number of smaller growth and cost reduction related capital projects in both manufacturing and BMD that are showing encouraging results.
We will continue to look at acquisitions when we believe opportunities can help us create long-term shareholder value.
We did not have any share repurchase activity in the second quarter.
As a reminder, we have 1.1 million shares remaining on the 2 million share repurchase program authorized by our Board in February 2015.
Finally, we remain committed to maintaining a sound balance sheet and financial flexibility.
We expect to manage towards our gross debt to EBITDA target of 2.5 times over the near term.
<UNK> will now walk through the financial results in more detail, and then I will come back with a few more comments on the outlook before we take your questions.
Over to you, <UNK>.
Thank you, <UNK>.
I'm on slide 4.
Wood Products sales in the second quarter, including sales to our distribution segment, were $346 million, up 2% from second-quarter 2015.
Wood Products reported EBITDA of $31.1 million, down from the $34.1 million reported in the year-ago quarter, principally because of the lower plywood and lumber sales prices as well as higher OSB costs used in the manufacture of I-joists.
Higher EWP sales volumes, particularly with the addition of the Alabama LVL operation, contributed incremental EBITDA, which offset much of the negative price variances from plywood lumber and purchased OSB.
BMD sales in the quarter were $850 million, up 12% from second-quarter 2015.
Sales volumes were up 13%, and pricing was down 1% in BMD.
BMD's EBITDA increased $10 million from the comparative-year quarter, driven primarily by a higher gross margin of $18.8 million, including an improvement in gross margin percentage of 100 basis points.
BMD's selling and distribution expenses increased $7.7 million with higher sales activity levels.
The corporate segment reported negative EBITDA of $7.1 million in the quarter, up $1.3 million from the $5.8 million reported in second-quarter 2015, primarily due to higher incentive compensation costs.
Turning to slide 5, our second-quarter plywood sales volume in Wood Products was 378 million feet, down 33 million feet or 8% from second-quarter 2015.
The $271 average net sales price for the quarter was down $31 from 2015's second quarter.
Of note, the $271 average was a $10 sequential improvement from the first quarter of this year, representing the first positive quarterly sequential comparison since third-quarter 2014.
The North American industry operating rate for plywood continues to be negatively impacted by imports of plywood from South America and decreased exports from the United States, driven by the relative strength of the US dollar.
We expect to manage our plywood production to demand again in the third quarter, with an emphasis on gaining additional value from using our veneer to produce engineered wood products.
The new plywood capacity being built by private equity investors in Mississippi has started initial commissioning work and may ship product later this quarter, which could put pressure on pricing.
Plywood pricing in the first several weeks of the current quarter is up about 10% in the West and flat in the South compared to second-quarter 2016 averages reported by Random Lengths.
We are about evenly split on our sales volumes between the West and the South.
As a reminder, our plywood pricing fell from $302 in the second quarter 2015 to $282 in third-quarter 2015, so we should face less of an earnings comparison headwind this quarter on plywood pricing.
Turning to slide 6, our second-quarter sales volumes for LVL and I-joists were up 33% and 14%, respectively, compared with second-quarter 2015.
Adjusting for the sales volumes attributable to the acquired EWP locations, our LVL volumes were up 11% and I-joists were up 3%.
As we continue to increase the production of Boise Cascade branded LVL at the two acquired facilities in the third quarter and we shift incremental customer order activity to the most logical production and shipping point, we won't be isolating the acquisition impact on EWP volume comparisons in the coming quarters.
LVL pricing was up 2%, while I-joists sales price realizations improved 3% from second-quarter 2015.
We did announce an EWP price increase in the Western United States and Western Canada in the second quarter, which we would expect to have a modest positive impact on our overall EWP realizations as we move through the third quarter.
Moving to slide 7, BMD second-quarter sales were $850 million, up 12% from second-quarter 2015.
By product area BMD sales of commodity products increased 12%, general line products increased 10%, and EWP sales increased 13% in BMD.
The gross margin percentage for BMD in second quarter was up 100 basis points compared to second-quarter 2015, driven primarily by favorable price trends for OSB and lumber during second-quarter 2016 as well as stronger margin contribution within our general-line products.
On slide 8 we set out the key elements of our working capital.
Company net working capital, excluding tax items and accrued interest, increased $9.3 million during the second quarter.
Inventories increased with higher seasonal sales activity, largely offset by higher accrued liabilities.
As a reminder, the statistical information filed as Exhibit 99.2 to our 8-K has receivables, inventory, and accounts payable data broken down by segment for those that are interested in more detail.
I'm now on slide 9.
Our cash balance increased by $14.9 million in second quarter.
We reduced our outstanding revolving credit balance to $45 million at the end of the quarter, which was $10 million lower than the March 31 balance.
We ended the quarter with total available liquidity of $415.2 million, which reflects the $20 million increase in our bank line commitments to $370 million and a higher borrowing base collateral level.
Our gross debt to EBITDA was 2.9 times at June 30.
As <UNK> mentioned earlier, we expect to manage our balance sheet toward our gross debt to EBITDA target of 2.5 during 2016 and 2017.
I would note our effective tax rate in the second quarter was 35.8%.
We would expect the full-year tax rate to fall between 36% and 38%.
<UNK>, I will now turn it back over to you.
Thank you, <UNK>.
The consensus estimate for 2016 US housing starts has declined modestly to [1.2] (corrected by company after the call) million starts from the earlier consensus of 1.23 million.
The year-over-year growth in housing starts the first half of the year has essentially all occurred in the single-family arena, which uses about three times as much wood per start compared to multifamily starts.
The mix of starts and the resulting impact on installed square footage is an important variable for our revenue growth in EWP and distribution.
The pickup in single-family construction this year has been encouraging, as it has created a more favorable demand backdrop than indicated solely by looking at the change in total housing starts.
We continue to believe that demographics in the US will support a return to normalized thousand starts of 1.4 million to 1.5 million starts.
I won't cover the last section of the outlook slide, as it is the same operating plan we have laid out now for several quarters.
The four sub-bullets are really about us executing effectively against the market opportunities in front of us.
I want to thank our employees for some really good work on controllable factors in the second quarter.
There is good momentum on a number of initiatives, and I am confident that there is more we can accomplish in the quarters ahead.
Thank you for joining us on our call this morning.
We would welcome any questions at this time.
Operator, would which you please open the phone lines.
<UNK>, this is <UNK> <UNK>.
I would say that the situation in the eastern half of the United States, partially driven by the acquisition, has been pretty fluid.
And we've had some wins, and we've had some losses.
And I think we're still kind of assessing how all of that comes together.
Overall, though, I would tell you that the transaction has been very favorably received by our customer base, and we're pleased with how it's proceeding.
But I would emphasize that it remains pretty fluid.
<UNK>, this is <UNK>.
I think that's probably as good as any number.
And kind of the buildup on that is ---+ you know, we still think BMD ends up with midcycle revenue somewhere in the 3.5 to 4 range.
And we've guided to a 3% EBITDA number as a rough guess, which would get you to $110 million to $120 million in BMD.
Corporate is probably $22 million to $24 million negative, and then the balance is in Wood Products.
And a fair amount of that was driven by what we were assuming at the time with plywood pricing.
So of that midcycle number in Wood Products that would be pushing up in the $180 million to $200 million range, we had penciled in about $70 million in EBITDA from the plywood business, which ---+ we are clearly not operating that level today.
And the pressure on pricing because of South American imports, and we'll see what happens with the start up in the Mississippi plant ---+ that's probably the piece that has the most concern at the moment.
But the flipside is I think we're very pleased with what we are seeing on the GP integration, and that should have, frankly, some integration benefit and probably push the BMD number up closer to the $120 million, $125 million.
So I think that $300 million, $310 million is still a reasonable number to think about, but it will take some recovery in plywood.
Yes, I think ---+ unfortunately, the latest numbers I have are as of May.
But if you look at May year-to-date, the shipments into the US out of Brazil are up to May's number ---+ that was the high point ---+ at 60 million cubic meters, which if you translate that, it's about 66 million square feet.
And it's 30% of Brazil's exports.
And it wasn't that long ago, back in 2014, that the US was only getting about 7% of Brazil's exports.
The good news is I think a lot of the domestic supply has adjusted to that reality, and I'm probably in the near term more concerned ---+ late third quarter and certainly seasonally as plywood weakens in the fourth quarter, we'll see what pressure the addition of this Mississippi plant causes and how many shifts they decide to run.
But seasonally, we've had some firming in pricing, and certainly the first part of the third quarter has been pretty good.
And less pressure as the exchange rate on the Brazilian currency has been in the low 3s, at the 3.3, 3.4 kind of number ---+ they seem to be much more sensitive to price.
So the situation has improved from where we were six months ago.
This is <UNK>, <UNK>.
I would add that I think that we are seeing more seasonal effects right now, and it feels like the impact of the Brazilian piece has been pretty well absorbed and factored into the pricing in the marketplace.
<UNK>, this is <UNK> <UNK>, good morning.
Certainly the quarter was good on a lot of fronts.
As you recall, the first quarter finished with some good momentum that carried us into that.
The seasonality kicked in; we had a nice mix of products in terms of EWP general line and the commodities.
Had some moderate tailwinds, both in wood and steel on the commodity piece.
And it had a healthy mix of directs and warehouse.
And so if you think about that from a modeling standpoint in terms of our margin, I would just encourage you to think about what we've done historically and the range historically.
And that could be the best guidance you could use there.
But we were pretty happy.
We are not expecting 11% incrementals on sales.
I think we have kind of historically guided into the 4%, 4.5% range.
And as <UNK> said, we had a number of things that contributed to margins.
If you look at the full-year average for 2015, we were at 11.6, and in the second quarter this year we are at 12.5, and we are at 12 year to date.
And as <UNK> said, there's a couple of things that are contributing to that that should make it modestly better than 2015, but certainly not anticipating the 12.5 to hold as we move into the second half of the year.
No, I think ---+ this is <UNK>, <UNK>.
I think that between 3 and 4 Real to the US dollar, I think that the US still provides an attractive opportunity for them.
I think that ---+ but obviously, as you get closer to 3 it becomes less of an attractive opportunity.
And so there's capacity that's left to come here, but I think they look at Europe, they look at other markets and make their best decisions.
So that's one thing to think about.
And the other thing to think about is the Real has moved down fairly sharply from the beginning of the year, and I don't think we know at this time how long the lag is on that.
You've got 30 days on the water; you've got the manufacturing schedule.
So we may ---+ if it stays at the level it's at that and Europe remains an attractive market, you may see less coming this direction.
It's clearly a concern, yes, that if the Real weakens, then would have two things to worry about.
<UNK>, a little more on the mill in Mississippi.
The local mayor's office does a weekly update, and they have started running veneer blocks.
They are not heating them yet, but they have started running various machine centers and doing checkouts.
So by the end of the third quarter, I would expect them to have volume in the market.
Yes, sometime in September, if not late August.
<UNK>, this is <UNK>.
Let me touch on both points.
You may recall in the first quarter, our manufacturing business ---+ one, because of the weakness in plywood and others trying to make sure that we had good service programs, we did offer dated terms between manufacturing and BMD and some of our other independent wholesalers and put more product out into the market in first quarter, which caused the volumes in manufacturing to be up relative to the housing starts.
I think that's part of the reason ---+ you know, adjusting for GP, you see 11% on LVL and low single digits on I-joists.
Part of that was frontloading inventories in March ahead of the spring building season.
So as we get into the back half of the year ---+ right now I'd say that inventories in the field are very normalized relative to the demand levels.
And I would expect third quarter and fourth quarter our EWP numbers to be more in line with what you're seeing on single-family starts.
And again, we are going to have a tougher time in third and fourth quarters sorting out the impact of the GP facilities and isolating that as we ship orders to Alabama and North Carolina with the new facilities and potentially away from Louisiana to capture freight and operating synergies.
But the underlying base demand, I think, will be very much in line with single-family starts.
This is <UNK>.
On the cost reduction side, I don't know that there's any one thing that really stands out.
I think it's just part of the ongoing effort to improve things.
As an example, TC mentioned that with the start-up of the new dryer in Florien, we're going to not only have more volume; we're going to have a different cost structure.
The biggest issue that I think ---+ that relates to ---+ in that area is really the shift of products ---+ shift of veneers into EWP and the decisions, ongoing decisions, to cut back our plywood production as it got near our cash cost position.
So it's really ---+ we think about our business being marketing veneers.
And so it's finding better homes for the veneers.
I think the guys did a really good job in the second quarter.
As far as the fire codes, I'll give you my thoughts, and then I'll let <UNK> talk about it.
But I think we continue to see that as a challenging market issue, and we continue to develop products to combat that.
I do not think it's going away, and I don't think it has yet stabilized.
But <UNK>, your thoughts.
You know, on the fire issue, <UNK>, frankly, the bulk of the states that need to implement the code change have not yet done so.
So there's going to be more impact from it.
The relative number of basements is not a huge number, so the total I-joists volume is not massively impacted by it.
And the key is having another solution available that keeps you from losing the rest of the EWP business in the house.
So that's really been our focus there.
It's not over with, and it's ---+ but I would not say it's an enormous factor in I-joist consumption, but it's certainly a negative factor.
A couple of things I'd add on <UNK>'s comments on the cost side.
I think if you compare the fourth quarter, where our downtime in veneer and plywood cost us money, the types of downtime we took in the second quarter actually enhanced margins.
So that was ---+ I think the team did a really, really stellar job.
The other place I'd say that based on some of our past communications is we've made some very, very substantial progress addressing issues we had in the Eastern Region that we talked about a year ago.
Okay.
Thanks, everyone, for joining us.
Appreciate the time, and Brian, thanks for hosting.
We will talk to you all next quarter.
Have a great day.
