SWX
#Thank you, Sherrie.
Welcome to Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc.
's 2017 First Quarter Earnings Conference call.
As Sherrie stated, my name is Ken <UNK>, and I am the Vice President of Finance and Treasurer.
Our conference call is being broadcast live over the Internet.
For those of you who would like to access the webcast, please visit our website at www.swgasholdings.com and click on the conference call link.
We have slides on the Internet which can be accessed to follow our presentation.
Today, we have Mr.
<UNK> <UNK>
<UNK>, President and Chief Executive Officer; Mr.
<UNK> <UNK>
<UNK>, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Mr.
<UNK> <UNK>
<UNK>, Southwest Gas Vice President, Regulation and Public Affairs; and other members of senior management to provide a brief overview of the company's operations and earnings ended March 31, 2017, and a full year outlook for 2017.
Our general practice is not to provide earnings projections, therefore, no attempt will be made to project earnings for 2017.
Rather, the company will address those factors that may impact this coming year's earnings.
Further, our lawyers have asked me to remind you that some of the information that will be discussed contains forward-looking statements.
These statements are based on management's assumptions, which may or may not come true, and you should refer to the language on Slide 3 in the press release and also our SEC filings for a description of the factors that may cause actual results to differ from our forward-looking statements.
All forward-looking statements are made as of today, and we assume no obligation to update any such statement.
With that said, I'd like to turn the time over to <UNK>.
Thanks, Ken.
Turning to Slide #4.
While we're still early into 2017, we wanted to touch on a number of highlights for the year so far on today's call.
First, from a consolidated results perspective, we increased our dividend for the 11th straight year in a row.
The latest change represents an approximately 10% increase, so we are now in an annualized dividend of $1.98 per share.
We also entered into an incremental $100 million credit facility for our holding company that will run through March 2022, and we established a $150 million equity shelf program.
Next, for our natural gas operations, we saw the Arizona Corporation Commission approve a settlement in our previously pending rate case proceeding.
The commission's approval established new rates effective April 1, 1 month earlier than originally anticipated.
We added 30,000 new customers over the past year, moving ever closer to the 2 million customer mark for our company.
And we amended the utility's credit facility to expand our borrowing capacity from $300 million to $400 million.
Then, for our unregulated construction services segment, we saw detrimental first quarter impacts from weather as well as the temporary slowdown of work with one of our larger customers.
We do remain optimistic about this segment's full year prospects, however.
Moving to Slide #5.
For the outline for today's call, <UNK> <UNK> will provide an overview of consolidated earnings along with segment details for our regulated and unregulated operations, <UNK> <UNK> will provide an update on our regulatory activities, and I will close with an update on customer growth, regional economic metrics, capital expenditures and our expectations for 2017.
With that, I will turn the call to <UNK>.
Thank you, <UNK>.
Let's jump right into things on Slide 6 with a look at consolidated operating results.
For the 3 months ended March 2017, we earned $69.3 million or $1.46 per basic share, down from $75.4 million or $1.59 per share in the first quarter last year.
During the 12-month period, our earnings improved from $142 million or $3 per basic share to $146 million or $3.07 per share.
Next, we'll look at the relative contributions of each segment to the change in earnings starting on Slide 7.
Natural gas operations results were flat between periods, consistent with our internal expectations.
Recall that our Arizona rate relief does not kick in until the second quarter.
Construction services, on the other hand, saw their losses increase by $5.2 million between periods.
Several factors influenced those results, which I'll speak to later.
This next slide breaks down the change in earnings between 12-month periods.
Gas segment net income increased $8.5 million, while construction services experienced a net decrease of $4.1 million.
Next, let's look at each segment, starting with natural gas operations on Slide 9.
Now although the change in contributed net income was minor, I'd like to mention a couple of offsetting items.
Operating margin increased $4.2 million as a result of customer growth and California rate relief.
We added 30,000 net new customers over the last 12 months, the highest annual level in about 10 years.
Offsetting the margin growth were O&M cost increases totaling $7.9 million or 7.8%.
About 1/3 of the increase pertains to compensation programs, whose accounting expense is skewed toward the first quarter of the year for retirement-eligible employees.
Also, proxy-related costs were higher than usual this year.
Lastly, income on company-owned life insurance, or COLI, policies exceeded the prior year by $1.9 million.
Moving to Slide 10.
We summarize the gas operation segment change between 12-month periods.
Much of the improvement was attributable to COLI, which reflect an income of $9.3 million currently versus a loss of $900,000 in the prior period.
Overall, our operating income was down slightly between periods as the strong growth in operating margin of $25.5 million was offset by higher O&M, depreciation and property taxes.
We'll now review Centuri first quarter operations starting at Slide 11.
Revenue decreased $14 million between quarterly periods due to 2 primary factors: inclement weather throughout many of our service areas; and a temporary work stoppage, which ---+ with one of our largest customers.
Construction expenses and depreciation, on the other hand, disproportionately declined a combined $4.7 million between periods due to logistics surrounding the temporary work stoppage, new customer startup costs and the higher labor costs incurred to complete work during the poor weather conditions.
A temporary work stoppage was a statewide regulatory mandate around training, affecting all contractors working for this customer.
NPL is gradually adding crews as training and qualification has completed, but a pretax loss of $3.6 million was experienced for the period.
Now with regards to weather, the map on Slide 12 shows how many of the U.S. service territories NPL operates in has heavy precipitation, which negatively impacts productivity.
It was mainly the southeastern part of the country that was warm and dry, a part of the country we currently do not operate in.
And finally with regard to first quarter operations, the slide ---+ or the chart on Slide 13 demonstrates that over the last 5 years, first quarter operating results are not a good predictor of full year earnings.
As such, we remain optimistic that much of the first quarter shortfall will be made up during our more productive summer and fall construction season.
Slide 14 rolls forward the contribution of net income for the 12-month period.
Construction revenues increased $91 million or 9% due primarily to additional pipe replacement work across the U.S. and Canada.
Construction expenses increased $106 million or 12% due to the additional workload, startup costs with recent new customers and costs related to the temporary work stoppage.
Let me now turn the time over to <UNK> <UNK> for regulatory updates.
Thanks, <UNK>.
On Slide 15, our regulation highlights that I'll cover today include an update on our recent Arizona rate case result and potential future rate case timing in our other states as well as continued progress on our infrastructure replacement programs and an update on 2 expansion projects.
Turning to Slide 16.
The Arizona Corporation Commission approved our proposed $61 million rate case settlement, and rates became effective April 1, 1 month earlier than was originally expected.
I believe this result is reflective of the constructive working relationship we have with the commission and their staff in Arizona as well as other stakeholders.
Slide 16 illustrates the anticipated impact of the $61 million increase to operating income for both 2017 and 2018, including the earlier effective date.
We're very pleased with the rate case outcome in terms of the operating income amount but also the tools that were approved as part of the rate case to help mitigate regulatory lag going forward, namely the continuation of our fully decoupled rate design, expansion of our existing customer-owned yard line program, implementation of a vintage steel pipe replacement program and the implementation of our property tax tracker.
Turning to Slide 17.
From a California rate case planning perspective, we are on a 5-year rate case cycle, which means we're currently scheduled to file our next rate case later this year.
However, following discussions with the Office of Ratepayer Advocates, we filed a petition requesting to extend the rate case cycle by 2 years.
The petition essentially requested that the commission extend the rate case cycle, leaving all other aspects of the decision intact, including the ability to make post test-year attrition adjustments for 2 additional years.
The Office of Ratepayer Advocates supports the petition, and it is our expectation that a decision should be forthcoming very soon.
Turning to Slide 18.
Since 2016 marked our third GIR rate application, in order for us to continue the GIR program this year, we're obligated to either file a rate case to clear out the deferral balances, moving them into base rates, or to file a petition requesting a waiver from that requirement.
After discussions with the commission staff and the consumer advocate, we chose to file a petition requesting a waiver from the regulations, allowing us to proceed with the GIR program for another year.
As part of that process, we also committed to filing a general rate case application sometime before June of 2018.
The petition was supported by the commission staff and was approved by the commission earlier this year.
Accordingly, we plan to file our next Nevada rate case in the first half of 2018, with new rates becoming effective later that year.
Turning to Slide 19 and our infrastructure replacement programs.
We continue to focus on establishing and maintaining these mechanisms in each of our jurisdictions in order to timely recover capital expenditures associated with commission-approved projects that enhance safety, service and reliability for our customers.
Since inception of our COYL program in Arizona, we have invested over $35 million and have been authorized to collect over $10 million in margin.
And with the expansion of this program being approved in our most recent rate case, we expect continued growth in our replacement activity.
In February, we filed our fifth report with the Arizona Corporation Commission requesting to establish a rate to collect margin of $1.8 million based upon 2016 capital expenditures of approximately $12 million.
All previous investment revenues being collected through the mechanism were incorporated into base rates as part of our most recent rate case.
We also anticipate being able to start some of our proposed vintage steel pipe replacement work this year, which will allow us then to make a filing in early 2018 to establish a surcharge to collect any margin associated with the replacement work that we're able to complete during calendar year 2017.
Turning to Nevada.
Since 2014, we have received approval to replace over $115 million of qualifying replacement projects and have been authorized to collect over $9.3 million of margin through the GIR surcharge.
Most recently, we received approval to replace $57 million of qualifying projects during 2017, and we're currently collecting approximately $4.5 million as a result of the most recent GIR rate application that was filed at the end of last year and was approved in December.
We continue to look to ramp up our infrastructure replacement program in Nevada as we work collaboratively with our regulators and other stakeholders to identify replacement projects to be replaced on an accelerated basis.
We anticipate filing another GIR advance application within the next week or so, proposing to replace ---+ proposing replacement projects to be constructed during 2018.
Turning our focus to major expansion and reliability projects on Slide 20.
In October 2016, Paiute initiated and received approval to proceed with a prefiling review process with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for its approximately $17 million expansion project in Northern Nevada.
A formal certificate application is expected to be filed by this summer for the 8.4 miles of additional transmission pipeline infrastructure.
We currently anticipate the additional facilities could be in service by the end of 2018, with new rates in place coincident with the in-service date.
Lastly, our $80 million LNG facility in Southern Arizona is still on schedule for being completed by year-end 2019, and we expect to officially break ground later this year.
To date, we have invested approximately just over $5 million in capital expenditures, primarily associated with the land that was chosen to site the facility.
As part of our rate case, the commission also approved our proposed cost recovery methodology for the facility, which will allow us to defer the revenue requirement associated with all costs incurred before December 31, 2020, to be recovered in future rate cases.
And with that, I'll turn it back to <UNK>.
Thanks, <UNK>.
Moving to Slide 21.
As I mentioned earlier in the call, we added 30,000 net new customers over the past year and now serve just under 2 million customers across our 3-state service territory.
Turning to Slide 22.
Economic conditions in our service territories continued to be robust.
Population growth in the areas we serve is forecasted to be notably above the national average over the coming 5-year period.
And as the table on this slide shows, unemployment rates in all 5 of our operating divisions declined year-on-year, with continued positive job growth.
On Slide 23, we show our expectations for capital expenditures for the coming 3 years compared to this past year.
We invested $457 million last year to serve growth and improve the safety and reliability of our gas delivery systems.
As <UNK> <UNK> outlined earlier, much of that capital investment is associated with support of cost recovery mechanisms authorized by our regulators.
These capital expenditures are expected to total $1.6 billion to $1.8 billion for 2017 through 2019.
Finally, wrapping up on Slide 24, updates to 2 items with respect to our expectations for this calendar year.
On the utility side, as I mentioned earlier, we received rate relief in our Arizona rate case 1 month earlier than expected, which should slightly improve year-end utility results.
And on the construction services side, we expect operating income to approximate 5% of revenues, a slight decline compared to our previously reported range of 5% to 5.5%.
Overall, these 2 updated expectations should largely offset each other, such that our consolidated year-end expectations are in line with those provided in our last call.
With that, I'll return the call to Ken.
Thanks, <UNK>.
That concludes our prepared presentation.
For those who have access to our slides, we also have provided an appendix with slides that include other pertinent information about Southwest Gas Holdings and its 2 business segments and can be reviewed at your convenience.
Our operator, Sherrie, will now explain the process for asking questions.
Hi, Tim, this is <UNK>.
We are still qualifying some of our employees or increasing the number of crews each week as weeks go by as we're able to add ---+ get to the training that's been required.
It probably won't be until later this year that we're back to full staffing with that customer.
And so there could be a little bit of an impact to our earnings, which is why we kind of lowered that operating income range from 5% to 5.5% down to 5%.
Tim, this is <UNK>.
No change in that from our perspective at the current time.
We still think that there are a lot of good prospects to continue growing that business, both organically as well as potentially through additional acquisitions.
I think the slide that <UNK> referenced earlier in the call, Slide 13, that shows the earnings growing at that business, continued to show that that's a good contributor to shareholder value.
That said, as we've talked before, Tim, we are going to be mindful of our business mix, and we don't want to stray too far from the business mix that we have now because we want to maintain our core utility identity.
And as we see that business continue to grow, we'll continue to evaluate the prospects for doing other things with it in the future.
Given first quarter results at the construction business and kind of looking at Slide 46 with the drivers, should we be tending towards the lower end of the 2% to 5% revenue growth.
Not at this point.
We still feel good about the potential to be in the middle of that or even reach the upper end.
It's just so early in the year, it's hard to predict with certainty where we're going to be, but we have a lot of bid contracts out there.
We have a lot of master service agreement contracts that are active.
And so we'd probably have a better view on that in the second quarter call when we get to the first part of the year when we've started to ramp up our construction crews, a better view on that.
And could you just give a little more detail about the stoppage.
Who ordered it, and what drove that ---+ drove it.
Well, we really don't want to comment on the specific customer.
The stoppage was statewide, and it was for all the contractors working for the customer.
There's been a number of contractor qualification processes that have been undertaken in East Coast states like New York, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Virginia, and only one of our state areas was impacted by the stoppage.
But as we get our employees requalified, we're putting them back to work.
And later this year, we should be back to full force.
Was it the customer who ordered the stoppage or the state.
It was ---+ it ended up being both.
The state was looking at the contractor qualification processes and felt like there were some things that concerned them.
And so they mandated the customers that worked with their contractors and have all the ---+ all of their employees requalified.
Your employees or the customer's employees.
All of the contractors' employees.
Thank you, Sherrie.
This concludes our conference call, and we appreciate your participation and interest in Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc.
Everyone, have a great day.
Thank you.
