OGS
#Thanks, <UNK>.
Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us.
Net income for the second quarter 2016 was $20.3 million, or $0.38 per diluted share, compared with $12.1 million, or $0.23 per diluted share, for the same period last year.
New rates in Oklahoma and Texas positively impacted results.
This includes the approved rate case in Oklahoma this past January and approvals from various GRIP and cost-of-service filings in Texas over the past year.
Operating costs for the second quarter were $110 million compared with $112.5 million for the same period last year.
Outside services, fleet-related costs, and IT expenses decreased but were partially offset by higher employee-related costs.
Year to date, operating costs were $232.2 million compared with $234.9 million for the same period last year.
I will provide additional detail on operating costs as it relates to our updated guidance in a moment.
Capital expenditures for the second quarter were approximately $70 million compared with $71 million for the same period last year.
ONE Gas ended the quarter with $54 million of cash and cash equivalents, no borrowings under our $700 million credit facility, and a total debt-to-capitalization ratio of 39%.
Last week the ONE Gas Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.35 per share, unchanged from the previous quarter.
This dividend is consistent with the Company's guidance for 2016.
As we have indicated previously, we expect the average annual dividend increase to be 8% to 10% between 2015 and 2020.
Now, on to our updated guidance.
As announced in the press release, we updated our net income guidance range for 2016 to $135 million to $140 million compared with the previous range of $127 million to $137 million.
Earnings per diluted share is expected to be $2.55 to $2.65 compared with the previously announced range of $2.40 to $2.60.
This updated guidance reflects lower operating costs, approximately 2%, driven by lower outside service costs, lower fleet and IT expenses.
Day-to-day processes are being improved by leveraging technology throughout the organization, including field operations, customer service, and information technology, enabling our Company to be more efficient and customer-focused.
Net margin is expected to be slightly lower, less than 1%, due primarily to warmer-than-normal weather in our service territories, experienced primarily in the first quarter of 2016.
We still expect capital expenditures to be approximately $305 million in 2016, with more than 70% targeted toward system integrity and replacement projects.
For a line item breakdown, we provided an updated guidance table on the last page in the press release.
We expect our earned ROE for 2016 to be 7.6% compared with an ROE of 7.4% for 2015, reflecting the approved rate filings this year.
At June 30, 2016, our current authorized rate base, defined as the rate base established in our latest regulatory proceedings, including full rate cases and interim rate filings, was approximately $2.7 billion.
Considering additional investments in our system and other changes in the components of our rate base that have occurred since those regulatory filings, we project that our rate base in 2016 will average approximately $3 billion, with 43% of that being our rate base in Oklahoma, 31% in Kansas, and 26% in Texas.
And now I'll turn it over to <UNK> <UNK>, ONE Gas President and Chief Executive Officer.
<UNK>.
Thanks, <UNK>, for that update, and good morning, everyone.
I'll start with a brief regulatory update and then I'll wrap up with a few comments on the updated guidance.
Beginning with Texas, in June we filed a rate case requesting an increase in revenues of $11.6 million for our central Texas and south Texas jurisdictions.
Our request is based on a 10% return on equity and a common equity ratio of 60.5% based on ONE Gas's actual equity ratios as of December 31, 2015.
This rate case reflects $43 million of investments in systems and facilities for these service areas.
This filing also includes a proposal to consolidate the south Texas service area with the central Texas service area.
If approved, new rates are expected to be effective no later than January of 2017.
In March of 2016, we filed a rate case requesting an increase in revenues of $12.8 million for the El Paso, Dell City, and Permian service areas.
The request is based on a 10% return on equity and a 60.1% common equity ratio.
This rate case reflects $34 million of system and facility investments.
The filing also included a request to consolidate these three service areas into a new west Texas service area.
We recently concluded the hearing on merits at the Texas Railroad Commission, and we expect a final decision by October.
Now on to Kansas, where we filed a rate case in May.
The procedural schedule for Kansas gas services filing was approved by the Kansas Corporation Commission on June the 8th.
The evidentiary hearings are scheduled for October 18 through the 20th, and a final order from the Commission is due December 28.
Now I'd like to share my thoughts related to our updated guidance.
I'm very pleased with our Company's focus on our processes and the outcomes we are producing.
From Day 1 of this Company's spin, I've stated that we will be a focused organization dedicated to our standard to operate and maintain this 100% regulated natural gas distribution business.
Every day we focus on the process of maintaining or lowering our operating expenses to sustainable levels.
We will continue to invest in our systems and in our technology to further improve the efficiency of our operations, and we'll remain vigilant in driving costs to sustainable levels.
These expected improvements will help us better serve our customers as well as moderate future cost increases.
I'd like to close by thanking our 3,400 employees for what they do every day for our customers.
I appreciate their hard work, dedication, and commitment to delivering our product, natural gas, to more than 2.1 million customers safely and reliably.
Operator, we're now ready for the questions.
Well, at any time, <UNK>, that you're in a full-blown rate case, it's basically everything that you mentioned.
You look at ROE, you look at the equity percentages, the spend, the expenses.
So it's all wrapped up into one for our total accounted case.
So there wasn't anything particularly focused out on that.
It's just a combination of multiple things.
So the technology improvements that we're making, <UNK>, without getting into a tremendous amount of details, it allows us to be more efficient in our processes.
So it allows us to be more efficient in the way we dispatch people, not only on the customer side, but on the asset side.
That was the piece that was actually missing prior to the spin, is we focused on how we dispatched the work on the asset side of the business.
So it really boils down to the two pieces, which is internal labor and outside labor, or external labor.
So what we focus on is we ask that question, is it better on any particular type of task, both from a maintenance project and a capital project standpoint, to perform that work either internally or externally.
So what we're finding out is by putting that focus on there, we're able to optimize the differences there between doing things internally and externally, and that's where we're seeing a lot of the gains.
It's actually helped by the technology that we're deploying.
Well, I would say, <UNK>, that number one, there's a long way to go between now and a five-year projection.
So that's the first thing that I'd say.
Number two, there's a lot to regulatory outcomes, which I think that probably has more to do with it than anything.
We've always stated that you can either get a high regulatory outcome or a low regulatory outcome, and that's what drives us between that low number and that high number.
Certainly, the efficiencies, as we indicated in our script, it's about moderating those cost increases, because you're going to have increased cost to the customer because of the investments in the assets, which is the right thing to do for reliability and safety reasons.
So we want to try to offset some of those increases due to ---+ and moderate those increases ---+ by maintaining a certain level of cost structure.
