What I'm saying is that to argue that our ancestors were sexual omnivores is no more a criticism of monogamy than to argue that our ancestors were dietary omnivores is a criticism of vegetarianism.
Estoy diciendo que argumentar que nuestros antepasados eran omnívoros sexuales no es más crítico hacia la monogamia que argumentar que nuestros antepasados eran omnívoros dietéticos, como crítica al vegetarianismo.