And I just think that it's interesting that the idea of using real-world crashes, which is very much something that economists think would be the right thing to do, is something that scientists don't actually, usually think — they would rather use a laboratory, a very imperfect science of looking at the dummies, than actually 30 years of data of what we've seen with children and with car seats.
Y sólo pienso que es interesante que la idea de usar choques de la vida real, algo que los economistas piensan seria lo correcto de hacer, es algo que los científicos usualmente no piensan es algo que harían en un laboratorio, ver muñecos de una ciencia imperfecta en vez de analizar 30 años de datos de lo visto en niños y asientos de auto.