Madison went utterly ballistic. And in this pivotal, critical decision, instead of just telling the world that his old friend Hamilton was wrong and was adopting the wrong policies, he actually began to argue that Hamilton's ideas were unconstitutional — that they violated the very nature of the Constitution that the two of them had drafted together.
Madison era completamente incisivo. Y en esta decisión crucial y crítica, en vez de solo decirle al mundo que su viejo amigo Hamilton estaba equivocado y adoptando las políticas equivocadas, en realidad empezó a aducir que las ideas de Hamilton eran inconstitucionales, que violaban la propia naturaleza de la Constitución que ambos habían redactado juntos.