context: Modern Nationalism, as developed especially since the French Revolution, has made the distinction between "language" and "dialect" an issue of great political importance. A group speaking a separate "language" is often seen as having a greater claim to being a separate "people", and thus to be more deserving of its own independent state, while a group speaking a "dialect" tends to be seen not as "a people" in its own right, but as a sub-group, part of a bigger people, which must content itself with regional autonomy.[citation needed] The distinction between language and dialect is thus inevitably made at least as much on a political basis as on a linguistic one, and can lead to great political controversy, or even armed conflict.
question: যদি একটি ভাষার অধিকারী একটি দলকে পৃথক লোক হিসাবে গণ্য করা হয়, তাহলে সম্ভবত কোন রাজনৈতিক ব্যবস্থা অনুসরণ করে?
answers: its own independent state