context: In 2007 the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), noted in its judgement on Jorgic v. Germany case that in 1992 the majority of legal scholars took the narrow view that "intent to destroy" in the CPPCG meant the intended physical-biological destruction of the protected group and that this was still the majority opinion. But the ECHR also noted that a minority took a broader view and did not consider biological-physical destruction was necessary as the intent to destroy a national, racial, religious or ethnic group was enough to qualify as genocide.
question: మానవ హక్కుల యూరోపియన్ న్యాయస్థానం 2007లో జాతి నిర్మూలనకు సంబంధించిన అర్హతలను మరింత మెరుగుపర్చడానికి ఏ మునుపటి కేసును పరిగణలోకి తీసుకుంది?
answers: Jorgic v. Germany