  We have analyzed the projected galaxy distributions in a subset of the ENACS/ COSMOS cluster sample. We made Maximum-Likelihood fits to the distribution of COSMOS galaxies for 4 theoretical profiles, with `cores' (generalized King- and Hubble-profiles) and with `cusps' (generalized Navarro et al., or NFW, and de Vaucouleurs profiles). We use the Likelihood ratio to investigate whether the observations are better described by profiles with cusps or with cores. Taking the King and NFW profiles as model of either class, we find that about 75% of the clusters are better fitted by the King profile than by the NFW profile. However, for the individual clusters the preference for the King profile is rarely significant. When we limit ourselves to the central regions it appears that the significance increases drastically, with 65% of the clusters showing a strong preference for a King over an NFW profile. We constructed composite clusters from the COSMOS and ENACS data, taking special care to avoid the creation or the destruction of cusps. We scale by different ways (projected distances, core radii, r_{200}).In all three cases we find that the King profile is clearly preferred over the NFW profile. However, this preference is not shared by the brightest galaxies. We conclude that these galaxies are represented almost equally well by King and NFWprofiles, but that the distribution of the fainter galaxies clearly shows a core rather than a cusp. Finally, we compared the outer slope of the galaxy distributions in ourclusters with results for model calculations with different cosmological parameters. We conclude that the observed profile slope indicates a low value for Omega_0. This is consistent with the direct estimate of Omega_0 based on the M/L ratios of the individual clusters. 
ENACSVII, Galaxy density profiles of rich clusters of galaxies