indo-europeans didnt even originate in europe, so why are people talking about 'european origin'  who are modern europeans? they are barbarians who invaded rome and the european continant during the early middle ages. these tribes assimilated both within themselves (i.e other germanic groups) and the indigenous populous (i.e jutes and the britans ext..)  the francs, saxons, normans, goths and various other viking/germanic denomenations constitute todays european continant and nations, and indeed their subsidaries in america, australia ext.. i do medieval studies at uni, and these are accepted facts by everyone.    while these barbarians were pilliging in the early 1st millenium, their other indo-european brethren had set up amazing civilisations for more then 2000 years before in the near east and mediterranean  i am of armenian extraction myself. i am white, but dont consider my nation to be 'white' to the true nordic definition of the word, however we are indo-european, and in fact are a singular brach on the tree, unlike anyone else    so to the 'europeans' out there, what exactly makes you tick as a nation or group of people. is it merely the fact your skin is white? because let me tell you something, jews have white skin aswell, so do a whole gambit of other races which you lads prob hate... as mentioned above you boys didint even get clsoe to 'western civilisation' thousands of years after the greeks (god bless them), armenians, persians, hittites even lol. not a condescending question at all. just interested.    it seems to me that WN is more of an american construct, to galvanise your nation agaisnt the black vermin... which is fare enough. thats why its sad to see europeans get mixed up in all that... because the only reason they are is through globalisation..i.e spread of westernisation, american ideas (WN)... which is ironically a liberal-zionist construct anyway