The jury make also think she's in denial, which will become more Obvious depending on how much O'Mara can say about Trayvon.  I wonder if the jury knows that Trayvon had just been kicked out of her home after a ten day suspension from school.   If Trayvon were such a saintly young man, why would his mother pawn him off on his dad?   The jury probably doesn't know any background info on Trayvon. I hope O'Mara is able to talk about:  1). The stolen jewelry and burglary tool.   2). The assault on the bus driver  3). Any of the three suspensions from school  4). The MMA pictures  5). His filthy posts in his Twitter account (I don't think he's gwan to hebbin' looking at those.)      For revenge and also money. O'Mara got a copyright on Trayvon's image. How petty and greedy is that?    Yup, I think we know why that was. He answered the question honestly at first, and then changed his answer to go along with the lawsuit.      O'mara will bring it all up. he warned the prosecution before trial that if they tried to use any other facts about george other than what matters (i.e. what happened that night), then trayvons past would become relevant. since they tried to use the fact that george tried to become a cop, against him (despite the fact that he was only denied because of a bad credit score) that means they broke O'mara's rule, which makes trayvons past open season to bring forth in trial.     after all, if they want to infer things from zimmermans past speaks to his guilt, then it's only fair they they infer things from trayvons past that speaks to why he was the type of person people would find themselves needing to defend against. that means they have to prove that trayvon has a history of illegal activity, including physical violence and things like drug use that can lead to physical violence. the big question for jurors will be why would trayvon attack george unprovoked..... since we all know trayvons history, this won't be hard to prove at all.