  41 times versus 3?. Wow.  If you want to start a peeing contest, BNP versus N9s; Various parties on this thread have compared the membership and fortunes of BNP compared to the N9S. The snide have alleged , or wish, that the N9S consists of only 1 person (or '50' as our resident Will Hay fan Fraser has surmised): Versus how many members in the BNP?..........  Has the BNP got only 13 times as many members as N9s?. If not, your attempted numbers game regarding quota of parliamentary questions, proves that the N9S is a far more cost-effective organisation.  :cool:  Since kevin refuses to tell us how many members he has its imposible to know for sure if the BNP has 13 times the membership. However the BNP has 17000 members, so lets presume that the N9S has 500 members, that would mean that the BNP has got about 34 times the membership numbers, which using your logic means the BNP is more cost effective. Plus the chances of the N9S having 500 members is low indeed (that would make them about the same size as the NF!) I personally think its more like 50.