So... you bitch about people calling others e-lawyers, while they themselves are e-lawyering... then proceed to be an e-lawyer to the max not even a paragraph later.....      Seems you missed the point entirely, and ultimately came to a convoluted conclusion.     The whole point is, that by calling people e-lawyers and trying to refute what they had to say, you yourself are e-lawyering. In fact, it's a trick argument that tries to gain the upper hand by confusing and using double standards, because in order to argue against it, you yourself have to 'e-lawyer'. That's no different than trolling. It's the same tactics blacks use against whites all the time in order to sway opinion.     But in the end, opinion doesn't matter....only facts do, and there are no facts to disprove what I've said. None. Zip. Zilch. Zero. No matter how much you wish there were. If you want to argue with me, do it in PM or one at a time.....don't try to gang up in a pack like blacks do. There is no place for that in these forums.    The difference between me and you, is I have conviction because I  know  I'm right.....you have conviction because you  think  you're right.