an all female jury could go either way....but if they convict, zimmerman may be able to assert that he was not given a fair trial due to the demographics of the selected jury. an all female jury is pretty much an automatic mistrial if asserted because it can be argued that it was not a jury of his peers in any sense.     I'm not sure if an all female jury can handle such a trial impartially, regardless of race.     it does seem a bit suspect that in a case that has been tried on emotions in the public eye, is going to be legally tried by people known to be extra emotional, especially mothers.     it's really down to if they follow the evidence, or their feelings.    following the evidence in this case, is nothing but an acquittal for Zimmerman. following emotions is nothing but a guilty verdict.     the problem with all potential jurors in any trial, is they don't generally have a grasp on actual law. for example, they may think someone is not guilty of something.....but deserve SOME type of punishment due to the loss of property or loss of life, etc, even if they were justified. this is a big issue in the legal system.     the other problem with an all female jury, is that no matter the outcome, either side of this case can use it to cite the reason why they think the outcome wasn't justified.     if zimmerman is acquitted, they can say justice was not done because of the type of jury.    if he is found guilty, we can say justice was not done because of the type of jury.     the prosecution and defense both have their reasons for agreeing on such a jury.    the defense hopes that if they convince an all female jury that he's innocent, the public will have no excuse to not accept his innocence decided by mothers. after all, even if he is acquitted, he's still being handed down a death sentence by the negro and ant-racist white guilters since he will be unable to appear in public with any guarantee that someone won't try to murder him. I'm not too sure these people will be quelled by the decisions of a jury just because it's all female.     the prosecution hopes to pander to their maternal instincts by making trayvon look like an innocent child followed by big bad boogey man. the prosecution will say things like wouldn't you want your son to be able to defend himself against a man following him with a gun? wouldn't you want justice if that man killed your son?. he will say these things to detour them from the true relevant facts: that trayvon confronted and attacked zimmerman unprovoked, in a vicious manner that resulted in great bodily harm, and could have resulted in death.    but if the prosecution doesn't get that outcome, they will then try to move for a mis-trial due to the jury's makeup. that's their ace in the hole. they'll try to drag the trial on even longer, making sure zimmerman is definitely broke and that his lawyers might not continue defending him due to the length of the trial without being paid. so then they'd be facing an inexperience underpaid public defender with virtually no resources. public defenders are notorious for being push overs who often would rather convince their client to take a plea bargain.    it's obvious the prosecution is playing a lot of games and has no intention of anything less than a guilty verdict, and will try to drag this trial on needlessly until things are soo convoluted that they'll get it.    the prosecution also has another reason to drag this trial on: to keep themselves out of prison. we all know about the discovery issues with the prosecution altering and hiding evidence. there's a hearing set for that at the end of the year, which if found guilty, will be facing some very serious charges. BUT the prosecution can argue they're too invested in this case to be replaced, therefore the coming charges against them can be held off as long as zimmerman is on trial.     this is exactly why laws are in place that kept zimmerman from being charged in the first place. it's funny how hundreds of years of legal history and experience go down the drain when it comes to public emotions. trying zimmerman set us back hundreds of years in that regard.