I have a strong opinion for these minorities. It goes:    Gypsies form the first population that haven't integrated in 500 years history and is harmful for our society. Many Finns make difference between 'gypsy' and 'roma' the following way: gypsy is the one who looks like gypsy, smells like a gypsy, acts like a gypsy (stealing, knifings etc), and speaks like gypsy and lives like gypsy (16-year old pensioner, exploitation of wellfare). Then there are people, who do have gypsy ancestary, but who live like a Finn, speak like a Finn, works like a Finn, dresses like a Finn and don't cause harm to other people. Gypsies call them renegades, and Finns as romanis. This latter people or their ancestors also fight in army during WWII.    Jews in Finland are somewhat different population than in many other countries. As we may know, they also fought against Soviet Union in Finnish army ranks, only few kilometers away form brother-in-arms of German troops in Lappland. Even uncertain future of their own life didn't slacken their patriotism towards Finland. Finnish jewish community hasn't been active on multiculturalism nor against nationalism and its movements. They don't exploit history.    Despite the fact I'm really really anti-islamic, I regard Finland's tatars as decent people. Their form of religion have been hundreds of years very secular, and in practise they seem to be like little conservative christians with some of their habits, like more patriarchal culture and conservative attitude than average Finns. But they are enterpricing and industrious people and they also redeemed respection in wars. Their consept of honesty do not differ from Finnish one.