1% of the Indians? No, it is a far less number. Perhaps only a fraction of a percent of Indians carry blonde hair or green eyes, yet it is there.  The Aryan invasion of India is a well accepted theory. Even Spencer Wells, a virulent anti-racist and lover of racial equality, has written; The Aryans came from outside India. We actually have genetic evidence for that. Very clear genetic evidence from a marker that arose on the southern steppes of Russia and the Ukraine around 5,000 to 10,000 years ago. And it subsequently spread to the east and south through Central Asia reaching India. M17 shows that there was a massive genetic influx into India from the steppes within the past 10,000 years and Taken with the archaeological data, we can say that the old hypothesis of an invasion of people  not merely their language  from the steppe appears to be true.  Now the fact that the higher or lighter skinned Asiatic races (but never the darker Mongoloids, which carry no white blood) have strains of blonde hair, green eyes, blue eyes, et cetera - is even further proof of the Chinese merely being an elevated form of the common Mongoloid due to an infusion of white blood.    Ahah - Well, we only conquered the entire world. Nothing much.    Pure-blooded East Asians? A pure-blooded East Asian is a misnomer. It should be rephrased, East Asians with the highest dose of white blood, perhaps. Those are the most hard working and productive, as you call them.    A comparison once again of Vietnemese (or lower Mongols) and Chinese, showing the latter has clear European features.     Chinese - with straighter, thinner noses, thinner lips, et cetera     Dude........East Asians are not White just give it up. Just because they have White skin doesen't mean they are caucasian or European or Aryan. Why do you want them to be White so bad?:confused: