No. His family was able to raise bail a long time ago. The a-hole judge set the bail at a million dollars so his family members had to all chip in.  and that's what got judge lester kicked off the case. because 1) he did know about the donated money. 2) the donated money didn't legally count as income, and 3) even if the donated money did count, the bail was set well beyond if that money had been calculated for bail...    so it was obvious from the get go that the bail hearing was handled completely outside lawful procedure, which is again, why judge lester was forcibly removed.    furthermore, it was easy to argue that if lester didn't genuinely know about the donated money, that would be negligence on his part, especially considering the public transparency of the zimmerman fund.     so, looking back at the facts, that entire bail hearing was a farce based on prejudicial malice from the judge.