There are 2 sides to this.  I can understand both.   I have opted to not indulge any further with this thread due to my way of thinking, but I have to point out that there is something dis-concerting about this.  Now, those who moan about Nationalists who oppose any ethnic in BNP, well, its absurd for you to get so angry. BNP is or was for and soley for white people. You should therefore fully understand peoples worries, quarms and concerns about any ethnic within the party, and as a representitive.  I wonder what the ethnic liason committee is for?  Those who totally disagree with the BNP utilising a few ethnics, feel free to oppose, you have a right considering what the BNP is supposed to be for.  But although they may not be as hardline as some groups, the BNP are a political party with the largest margin of support. And our best hope.   i disagree with the angry hostile posts by those within the BNP whom are defending it so vigorously who will more than likely post some abuse about this post, i think you should understand peoples concerns, it is highly legitimate to be against any half turk or jew within the party.   This thread probably shouldnt have been started, but it seemed to have been started to show us that this half turk is actually like one of us. To which, 95% of us disagreed, also when was Nationalism solely about Looks.   I think this is a divisive issue, one which wouldn't be here if the BNP had kept to their guns and remained a party for and run solely by Whites.  Can't say it fairer of clearer than that. Great post :clink I don't want anymore non-whites letting in, and from what was said at the BNP conference I feeling much better about the issue. But I think it's really OTT to say the jews are taking over the party like a couple of people on stormfront seem to think, the BNP only has one full jew, the NF had more in the 1970s and they never got taken over.