To answer to your question, African team that calls itself French is obviously the proper way of seeing things. Good thing I dislike sports, wasting money just to see full grown baboons running after a ball is worthless. This is the only thing I agree with you so far :D     yet another anti who just cant see beyond the literal text and comprehend the bigger picture here...  Do you people practice a lot to become this stupid? Actually I think they are too lazy to do any practice, I see it more like a built-in feature. :rofl     NO I DO NOT. He is an Algerian.    YES, I most certainly agree with him.    French football no longer exists in my opinion. Sad but True. :(     I'd rather have a 100% white France with a ****ty soccer team then the interracial sh*thole i'm living right now with ok soccer team.  But I guess you don't have enough intelligence or pride to understand that. Agreed 100%, a team you can properly call French, good or bad it doesn't matter it's a damn game after all, but French!!    The ironic thing is that these super négres :rolleyes: that make the French team better :rolleyes: do nothing for their own national teams, only in an European country they can unlock their true potential?? :rofl     Right, Français et Belges sont descendants des Gaulois, qui eux sont descendants des Celtes; meilleure qualité de blanc comparé aux méditérannéens This post is not only divisive but stupid...     http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mediter...r_20th_century     Later in the 20th century the concept of a distinctive Mediterranean race was still considered useful by theorists such as Earnest Hooton in Up From the Ape (1931) and Carleton Coon in his revised edition of Ripley's Races of Europe (1939). These writers thought the Nordic race was the northern variety of Mediterraneans that lost pigmentation through natural selection due to the environment.  Hooton argued that even a skilled anthropologist would have a difficult time separating a Nordic from Mediterranean skeleton. He thought a destabilized blend of the two existed mostly in Britain that he labeled Nordic-Mediterranean, with hazel eyes (rather than pure brown), dark hair color (mainly dark brown) and dolichocephalic skull. Coon argued that smaller Mediterraneans traveled by land from the Mediterranean basin north into Europe in the Mesolithic era. Taller Mediterraneans (Atlanto-Mediterraneans) were Neolithic seafarers who sailed in reed-type boats and colonized the Mediterranean basin from a Near Eastern origin. He argued that they also colonized Britain where their descendants may be seen today, characterized by dark brown hair, dark eyes and robust features. He stressed the central role of the Mediterraneans in his works, claiming The Mediterraneans occupy the center of the stage; their areas of greatest concentration are precisely those where civilization is the oldest. This is to be expected, since it was they who produced it and it, in a sense, that produced them.   So much for the Mediterraneans being worse quality of White than the Celts, like you said... :rolleyes: