  It's amazing to me how you can come to that conclusion when there are countless policies in place that specifically reward people only and entirely for being non-White. I mean, exactly what do we have to give you failures to get you past your apparent inability to accomplish anything of merit?  This link you provide is at odds with the hard data from the NLSY, most likely because the leftist author of it intentionally chose not to apply proper corrections for the actual opportunities presented to each group. Whites-only scholarships, for example, are virtually unknown. (Someone once tried to link us to a list, but it turned out that every last one of them was open to non-Whites, too, when you read them.)  In light of these facts, isn't it more logical to conclude that we are looking at evolutionary ability differences between the races? Or do you reject that answer simply because it does not affirm your whiny victim-mentality?   http://www.finaid.org/scholarships/2...holarships.pdf    Caucasian students are 40% more likely to win private scholarships than minority students.    The reason whites-only scholarships are nonexistent is because most scholarships go to whites. Go figure! So, there doesn't need to be whites-only scholarships. In light of these facts, I seriously don't believe scholarship acceptance points to any sort of evolutionary ability differences in any way. Nor am I a victim.