Videos are in first posts.    Now you introduce random irrelevant facts that no one has mentioned and say no one has rebutted them?     Well we know he had money, we know Custer health gave him notice in September, we know there was no moratorium at that stage, so I would assume he would do it like anyone else, get relevant permits and call plumbers?  Those videos show nothing but a man slandering and harassing Cobb from afar, and Cobb responding by yelling back at him. That's not terrorizing, and proves nothing for your opinion.     Again, and you really need to stop ignoring this fact: Regardless of Cobb's intents, he ultimately could not legally complete the work. This trumps his intent.    Let's put it this way. Say you have 30 days to pay a ticket to keep your license. Say you're pissy about the ticket, and for the first 15 days don't intend to pay it. Then say on day 15 the building that processes ticket payments is closed for renovation for the next 15 days.......are you saying that you should lose your license, even though it's ultimately their fault you couldn't pay it?     It does not matter at all whether or not Cobb intended to comply. Are you saying he has no right to attempt to protest a law that was created specifically to target him? I don't know about your moral code.....but changing a law just for one man, doesn't float in my books.     See, you've got that black mentality. White man protests = he's evil. Black man protests = he's fighting for what's right.    Now you may not subscribe to the second half, but you're sure as heck subscribing to the first half....and on flimsy biased information no less, information that ultimately does not prove anything and leaves a lot of room for abuse and assumptions.         Consider for one moment that:    1) The police arrested them on trumped up baseless charges on purpose, and that the timing was especially chosen when they were armed in order to paint a picture and to appear to have probable cause.    2) That those in certain positions in the city, created these laws with the specific intent of attacking Cobb and making him look like a law breaker, in order to push him out. It's no secret they see Cobb as a threat to be dealt with...but he's not a threat because of anything he did, he's a threat because of what he stands for, and because minorities won't like it. The town is afraid of backlash.    Now imagine for a moment that Cobb never had any racial controversy surrounding him. Picture that he's some joe schmoe, but the same thing happens to him. You remove all the racial controversy, and Cobb becomes just some guy being unfairly targeted. But in your effort to distance him from the WN community in some futile attempt to protect its image, you can only see the controversy.     Maybe Cobb wasn't creating the white utopia you had in mind, but that doesn't mean he deserves to be falsely persecuted for it.     It's clear to see that they're working in full force to stack the odds against Cobb, just by the way they're talking about it and going about things. We have city officials saying stuff like...       Tomorrow wouldnt be soon enough, in my opinion, he said.   ..when talking about destroying his house. So they clearly admit they don't even think the legal required deadline is enough, they'd prefer to do it before then. They don't want his buildings up to code, they want him  out . It's clear they're operating under that intent.