  You, however, have insulted me repeatedly and witlessly for no good reason.  You called me a retard earlier   -Maybe it is you who needs a lesson in reading? I did not say you where a retard. I clearly remembering asking you if you where retarded.   -There is a difference between asking a question, and making a statement.        I'm not insulting you just because you don't agree with me, that's ridiculous.   -I dont find it offensive you dont agree with me, I find it offensive you keep insulting in every one of your posts.     -Learn to read.  -then you need to learn to read.  - Learn to read...  - then you should learn to read.    -There you said that 4 times in this single post alone.       Whites did invent the chariot and domesticate the horse, yes, but as I've said, they aren't white specific inventions. If you can't understand this, then you need to learn to read. Start with my previous posts.   -You keep saying that these things are environmental inventions and that Whites only invented them because we where in the right area.   -But I said we are not the only Race to have access to Horses, and said that Horses where in China to, you of course said there where not there and when I ask for a link or evidence you give me nothing.       Whites, by the way, didn't invent bronze, and if they did, then it clearly isn't a white specific invention, because the ancient Peruvians sure as hell weren't white.   -Tell me then since youre such an expert on the Racial make up of Anatolia. At the time Bronze was discovered, what Race was there then if it was not Whites?        I said that NE Asians had the ability to invent bronze if they had the right environment for it, which means copper and tin deposits in extremely close proximity to each other, like in Anatolia and parts of Peru.   -Early you said NE Asians invented bronze on there own, but you say here they had the ability to invent bronze if they had the right environment .   -Do you even know the location of Copper and Tin deposits in China and the Far East?        Synthetic ingredients were available in the 18th century, and the Roman concrete mix was reliant on Pozzolana from the area around Vesuvius.   -Pozzolana=Volcanic Sands.       Another lazily thought-out theory of yours this map debunks is the idea of Europe being an uncivilized land full of illiterate, warring tribes.   -Sure during the time of the Roman Empire, but I was talking about right after the collapse of Rome.   -Because of the collapse of Rome and the importation of Christianity, that sent Europe backwards and they had to start all over from scratch.  -I do not remember Chinese civilizations ever collapsing, and them having to start over from scratch .maybe you can name a time?        Europe at this time probably had a similar rate of literacy to the Han Dynasty.   -Europe? Rome might have had a literacy rate similar to Han China, but what about Ireland, Scotland, Scandinavia, Russia, Germany, Poland, Etc.   -Were not these places full of illiterate, warring tribes that where constantly killing each other?        Despite this, non-Greek whites, and to a lesser extent Greeks prior to Plato, had innovated less than the Chinese from the same time frame.   -We have already discussed this, learn to read.   -I gave ample reason for other Europeans not inventing as much.  -Divided small population divided up into many different tribes.  -You dont count Persia, even though it was mostly White at the time.  -I would also like to add environment now, Europe was mostly Forest at the time, not has suitable for large populations as China. Europe was also more rocky and cold, and Europeans unlike other Races did not get Fun in the Sun deal, they had to constantly fight for survival in a harsh environment.......       It doesn't make sense that gunpowder and saltpeter wasn't invented in classical Europe, despite the similar levels of civilization and wealth.   -My God! The Chinese invented 1 thing (Only Paper counts) that classical European never invented......That is just like so impressive! I mean WOW! I want to be Chinese now because obviously there superior, they got Paper...:p    -Ancient White Civilizations like Rome, Greece, and Persia are still far more impressive then China.        I don't care if Europe fell into a Dark Ages later on, because these two inventions (and many more which I shall go into in another topic) were invented during the time the Roman Empire was thriving.   -Gunpowder was not invented then, stop saying it was because it wasnt.   -Only Paper counts.        China had suffered far more from barbarian invasions than Europe.   -Okay lets name the barbarian invasions of each place so we can compare.  -Ill start with people who invaded both Places and continue from there.     Europe China   -Huns -Huns  -Mongols -Mongols     -Arabs   -Turks    -Goths  -Vandals   -Vikings  -Franks   -Saxons       They also suffered millions of plague deaths, just like in Europe.   -They had a larger population, there land is more suitable for huge populations, they can support more people easier, that a massive advantage over Europe.        And in modern times, a second generation Chinese Australian won the country's first Fields Medal, ahead of millions of Northern European Australians, and even millions of Scandinavians.   -You bring this up so much, would think you won it.   -Is that the only thing you can produce, that is not a very impressive argument if you ask me.       I'm NOT saying that NE Asians are just as scientifically innovative as whites, I'm suggesting that it's possible. That's all.   -W/E Whites invited 90% of everything, you can keep renaming all the Chinese inventions you want, the amount they invented is no where near what Whites have invented.   -Whites have invented far more then every Race combined; that obviously means where not equal in scientific matters then. More=Superior.....        I think there's even a South Korean period drama series along those lines.   -  .KW sucks .Hope it dose not come here; the thing with Japanese culture is more then enough.