Aryan? Rather a silly concept. Sure it's a terminology but Aryan signifies some Pan-Caucasoid identify, something that Hitler may had flirted with in the 30's but later abandoned. Pan-Aryanism is possibily even worse than Jewish Multi-Culturalism. Unlike White Nationalism which tolerates intermixing of white phenotypes, Pan-Aryanism is more monethical in nature [much like multi-culturalism]. If someone believes in that garbage than they should pay a visit to Iranian National Front or Pan-Aryan. Many of these men are non-white, who oogle and [if left alone] would mistreat our women and oftenly call us stupid fat white racists behind our backs. I prefer European-Caucasoid, Indo-European or anything that stresses European heritage. I don't want anything with a movement that stresses that I am the same as some Bangalore Dravidian Monkey in India.White Supremist? No, I just think someone would be retarded to think a degenerate Indian is the same as an Belgian male Dravidians aren't an Aryan people anyways. Dravidians are native to the south of India. The Aryan Indians are the ones from northern India, the Whiter ones, they look completely different than Dravidians. And Pan Aryanism does not stress that all Aryan peoples are the same only that we share a common Aryan aka Indo-European link. I'm not saying I subscribe to the idea of Pan Aryanism, perhaps I do or do not, just saying Dravidians are not considered Aryan at all.    As for the Original Poster.....if you think race is just skin color you are DUMB. Japanese have White skin, does that make them White???? And I am NOT a racist, or a White Supremacist, I am a racialist(meaning I recognize the genetic differences and inequality of different races, we are NOT all the same, and race is more than just superficial). I am a White Nationalist , a White Separatist, not a White Supremacist, and not a racist. You are barking up the wrong tree Fido.