Would that not be natural?   What else would you do with condemned property?  There are arguments perhaps that the property should not have been condemned. Although I believe Custer Health first contacted Mr Cobb, and ten other people about this in September (I am sketchy here on details, and am going by memory alone although I believe Mjodr may be able to provide more details as I believe he was in contact about this at the time).  There are arguments that a man should be allowed to live in conditions of his choosing, even if he chooses to live in squalor, but if law is applied, and house is condemned then surely it is logical, in respect of health and safety, to pursue the demolition of the property?  Mr Cobb did have several months to get the building up to standard, and the funds to do it with, but he chose not to.  a condemned home is not typically bulldozed UNLESS it poses a hazard such as collapse.     it makes no sense to bulldoze a home that can at some point, be brought to code. you don't junk your car because it has a flat do you? the police don't confiscate and junk your car for it being in your own driveway on bricks do they? in fact, it would be a gross and unnecessary damage of property to bulldoze the home. you don't bulldoze a home simply because it doesn't have plumbing. that's ridiculous any day of the week. it's an unjustifiable destruction of property plain and simple.     it's clear they want to bulldoze it so he has nothing to come back to, and to prevent him from getting it up to code.....in fact, it could be as simple as local business refusing to put in the piping and then using that against him.       tons of lies and twisted truths going on in leith, and it's all to serve one end: punish them    in fact if you comb through privacy laws (both local and federal), gregory bruce has broken more than one in a clear cut manner. not only because of how he went about things, but also because of his credentials as the web developer in that context.