  For anyone who seriously thinks Knox is innocent, please read the article below.   Look at the language Knox uses. Who talks like that?   Do you really believe this individual is speaking the truth? There's only one version of the truth and it's easy to tell it and you don't need qualifiers and strangely contorted, third-person language.  Also the article briefly refers to Knox's first claim that she spent the night of the murder with Sollecito, but Sollecito failed to back up her alibi on that. Just one of several stories Knox has thrown out that didn't stand up.      Everything this article states, is over analyzing everything. We all know that if someone is looking for guilt, even in the innocent, they can find it. Even then, at best, their analysis are pretty much saying 'most likely' or 'maybe', which leaves room for definite reasonable doubt. I don't consider speculation good enough to even present to a court. Perhaps instead of analyzing her words, they should be analyzing the tactics prosecutors are using to falsely convict.     In the end, all the prosecution has is police mishandled and contaminated 'evidence' that doesn't even point to her, and a whole ton of speculation. I mean the knife they say has her DNA on it, wasn't even the right type of weapon the murder was committed with. It's funny because all this DNA they tried to use against her had nothing to do with the murder, they pretty much painted her as being a careless murderer, except, they have zero DNA evidence linking her to the crime scene at all.......so she can leave DNA on a knife they tried to use against her that wasn't even used to commit the murder, but leaves no DNA related to the crime at all. When you analyze that while looking at the prosecutors, it's clear they're fishing for a guilty verdict regardless of her innocence or guilt, which speaks volumes. 2 can play the analysis game ya know. Now of course, DNA isn't the cornerstone of getting a conviction, but the problem is, nothing else is solid enough for any conviction. It's just I think (hope) you are guilty, therefore you are.     At this point, it's beyond whether she is guilty or not. She was found innocent after serving 4 years, never given so much as a 'sorry' or reparations, then tried and convicted again. Regardless of italian law, that's just immoral. Double jeopardy exists to keep people from being tried over and over for the same crime. In italy, you can be re-tried indefinitely, regardless of not guilty verdicts.    It's also important to note that italy has 3 verdict types: guilty, not guilty, and innocent. Knox was found innocent rather than just 'not guilty', which carries more weight.    It's clear these prosecutors are doing this to try to make their careers by taking on the big bad USA and its 'murderous' citizens. That type of win to them, is worth a thousand innocent people being convicted if that's what it took. It's less about knox's guilt and more about their fame.