  But are you talking about of the spanish colonies of Castilla Empire or in general of all colonies from north to south america?  I'm talking about catillian and portuguese colonies mainly, but the English and French colonies weren't so different, both England and France sent their own undesirables to the colonies, puritans, Jews, criminals, etc...     is always the bottom of society who emigrates. The extreme exemple is Australia: in its begining it contitues a prison. I suppose the whites in USA mixed with blacks and with the indian. The first fact origined the mulattos which is a big population in north america. The indians were isolated in the desert and they are actually a small population in the USA. But in the south colonies, the white people didnt emigrate in mass, just soldiers, religious people and governors. I hope you understand my horrible english. What I mean is that the percentage of white people was small so they represent nothing in that mix even if they had mixed. The actual population of the ancient spanish colonies is in its majority native or mestizo (mixed) of black and amerindian.  exactly, it depends on the country, though, but overall the white element in mestizo-American countries is depreciable.     I get a kick out of how some of you stormfront veterans like to try and push the buttons of us newbees with humorless sarcasm and hostility, but my Irish/Scottish temperment should care less. :p  The reason I know a lot about Spain is because I've been there and my wife's mother is from there. Although she's 100% white, she's the one who first brought up the fact that a lot of southern Spaniards in particular got Moorish blood, which is why they have dark features, and that its from the Moors mixing with northern black Africans. So beat up on my mother-in-law if you want. :D  Well, Spain is not free of ignorant people either... :rolleyes:  Just so you know being white doesn't necessarily mean you have to be milky skin toned, there are plenty of white Europeans that have olive skin tones and are neither mestizos nor moors, they still produce beautiful blond blue eyed children.     The spaniards who conquered and after colonized America werent the white thrash of Europe.   They were great people who arrived to a dangerous and different land.   They found there hostile and sauvage people, a fierce climate, etc..   I also have a theory to explain the under development of most of south and central America countries and its also based on a racial element.  Spaniards didnt displaced neither exterminated native indians because they didnt settled in that land.   The colonization consisted of exploit the natural resources. They didnt pretend to found another place to settle and leave Spain.  Yes, they found big cities to reinforce their control and they also thought it was necessary to save the souls of the natives (after discuss if they had souls), christianizaning them,  but the vast majority return to Spain.  We, the whites prefer living in temperate climate. In a tropical or ecuatorian climate we cant develope the agriculture neither cattle farming.   That is why white population majority is in Argentina, Uruguay, South of Brasil, Chile.  You can see the same in Africa where the whites have colonized South Africa which climate is similar to mediterranean   The larger emigration of spaniards to Argentina, Uruguay...hapenned during the first half of last century.  These countries dont belong to the third world. They are developed.  I disagree, all European countries sent their undesirables to the colonies, so they could get rid of them, Spain is no exception, it's logical to think so, they wouldn't risk their best elements in the first waves of exploration and setting up the colonies, the mortality rates were very high, the people you're talking about were the leaders of the exploration and a selected few but the big majority (crew, manpower) were the scum that Europe wanted to get rid of.    Anyways I rather deal with the scum of my own race than deal with the cream of the non-whites.     Those ugly beaners also like to play the victims they are always saying we exterminated the indians when most beaners have the indian look they play the victims because they want us to feel sorry for them and accept them and so that we have white guilt and it sure is working:rolleyes:  It's ironic, since most of the Europeans of today had nothing to do with the colonies, most of the Europeans that went to the colonies and exterminated the poor Indians either died in the colonies with no descendants or race mixed with the natives, so the descendants of the Europeans who exterminated their Indian ancestors are the same mestizos who complain about it! :rofl     Hispanics don't have to worry about being white.  They are mongrels.  The only so called Latin Americans who are white or Latin in any way are the Argentines.  Argentina is descended from Spanish colonists and later Italian and German immigrants.  This is not true for other Latin countries, who were not colonized, the people there are all mongrels or catholicized Indians.  A little fun fact: Argentina, the only white country in Latin America, is also the only Latin American country that is not a third world hell hole.  Hispanics are not mongrels, mongrels, ignorants, and the stupid American government misuse the term.    The south-cone countries are not completely white, they do have levels of admixture with Indians and Negroes not as much as the more tropical countries but still not enough to not being banana republics or being developed countries, not only that but the concentration of Jews is also higher in those countries. Argentina's Jewish community is the fifth largest in the world. :rolleyes:     For the same reason some Americans think Spain is in South America and that meso Indians are Spaniard?  mental retardation? government sponsored stupidity?, many Americans doesn't even know anything about the world outside their home town. :rolleyes: