Before I respond to the post from .:.BNP.:. I would like to address a comment in public to the moderators. You have been accused, I think falsely, of being excessively biased towards pro-BNP or pro-Griffin posters and against anti-BNP posters. Now .:.BNP.:., who is a pro-BNP and pro-Griffin poster has flagrantly broken one of Stormfront's rules by guessing the identity of a poster. I think that this is an excellent opportunity for the mods to show that they actually enforce the rules by banning .:.BNP.:. from the forum. There is nothing 'marginal' or 'debatable' about this -- it was a flagrant breach of a very sensible SF rule, the observation of which is important for the personal security of posters.  Now, to deal with .:.BNP.:. Who I am, madam, is no business of yours but you are correct that I'm no friend of the BNP these days. I have said this openly and it's obvious from my posts here so your guesswork tells us nothing that isn't flagrantly obvious. I have no hidden agenda -- I'm open in my opposition to the BNP and I've long taken the line that it is part of the problem rather than part of the solution and I have argued this in great detail elsewhere. I suppose my politics these days can be described as 'socialism in one country (or community) with a racial element'.   Now why should you care what I say?   1. Precisely because as an outsider I don't give a toss about who wins this factional fight and have no interest in the outcome. The BNP will never get anywhere with Griffin, Graham or anyone else in charge, so what's the big deal? Unless he's a state asset, which is unlikely but possible, Griffin is looking at a jail sentence, so he's history anyway. Graham's camp is too divided to pose an alternative. The whole thing is completely b*lloxed.  2. Because if you have any personal integrity whatsoever you should care about whether a man is being unjustly smeared WHATEVER his politics. If I had information to suggest someone is being stitched up then I'd come out with it whether he be a nationalist, Labour, Tory, Liberal, communist, whatever -- it's basic human decency. I have never agreed 100% with Steve's line and on several occasions when I tried to get letters published on the BNP Web site he blocked me -- that's normal politics and was his right. But I'm not going to sit back and remain silent while a decent fellow is smeared by the likes of you, who can't even abide by SF forum rules let alone those of human decency.  3. Because I have given you important information. Steve Blake has been active in nationalist politics for around three decades, since he was a teenager. There will be other people out there who can verify this. So if you're claiming that he's 'state', you're claiming that he was recruited at the age of 18 while at university and that his acting abilities are worthy of several Oscars. Anything is possible, but I put it to you that your scenario is a little far fetched.  I trust that meets your objection. I have already deleted the post which you said broke the rules. As for Steve Blake I never said he was state.