You are clearly not listening to facts.  Custer health served notices long before Leith began puffing out it's chest.  Mr Cobb had funds, times, and ability to act, negating what you say above, and proving it to be wrong, but he chose not to, and clearly defied this notice publicly.  These are the facts that count.  I think perhaps Mr Bruce and Leith have managed to fool you, as they have puffed out their chest, and beat it to show how big and tough they are, but it is fiction and is all show, it is Custer health who first brought this situation up, long before Leith, and it is they who also have last say.  Leith can only act within grounds and remit of Custer health, they themselves can not demolish house on own recognisances. you think what you're saying is important.....but it's simply not. they passed a law banning him from putting in plumbing and sewage BEFORE the deadline they set for him to put in plumbing and sewage. the fact that those overlap, once again, trumps everything else. it means he cannot comply at all in the allotted time even if he wanted to.   that's all that matters when it comes to principle.     what we have here, and what you're experiencing, is a clear case of cognitive dissonance. so you don't have to google it, i'll give you a quick run down of what cognitive dissonance is: it is when a person ignores new facts or undermines the importance of existing facts in order to cling to old conclusions.    It also means that even if cobb and dutton were found innocent tomorrow and all the abuses and harassment against them accepted as true, due to cognitive dissonance, you'd still find a way to justify your old conclusions to yourself, just like the trayvonites insist that trayvon was innocent despite every fact and evidence saying otherwise. that, or you'd simply recuse yourself and never admit you were wrong in the first place, and completely unacknowledge the fact that you were once attacking them. kind of like how some obama voters remorse are trying to forget the fact that they voted for him.     the problem isn't dutton and cobb.....the problem is people who claim to be WN's but distance themselves as soon as something like gun law violations are mentioned (even if there actually weren't violations) I've seen it over and over on here. They whine about the media when trayvon gets the angel treatment, but jump ship as soon as that very same media shows a WN in an unsavory spotlight. so when it comes to trayvon, don't believe the media!...then when it comes to cobb and dutton it all of a sudden becomes don't question the media! or what's happening.    and when you examine everything closely and with the proper knowledge, it's easy to see that cobb and dutton violated no gun laws nor were the accusations of harassment ever true...in fact, we can clearly see in the videos that it was cobb and dutton who were openly verbally harassed from afar without provocation. then it's easy to see that they literally changed the law in order to entrap him to where he must put plumbing in, but at the same time can't legally put plumbing in either.     now for a moment, entertain the idea that my last statement is 100% true...now objectively come to a conclusion based on that premise.