The out of africa theory is based on when they found the oldest human remains in africa decades ago. But since then, even older remains have been found in europe.....and these remains are MUCH older than anything found in africa. Yet no one has ever reassessed the theory and instead just accepted it as fact.    The most likely scenario of evolution is before we were even cavemen, when we were some creepy crawly creature, we shared a common ancestor in that. But beyond that, whites as we know it did not evolve from blacks, whites evolved completely independently of blacks.     This whole out of africa myth is just bad science, and the people who touted it saw it gain more traction than they expected and ran with it in hopes of getting money and fame. That's what you have to watch out for with 'great discoveries', because many of these professions have people in them who are willing to make assertions of discoveries in hopes of personal gain.     That's also why you have white people, such as those at stanford, who do half assed studies on racial statistics. They figure because they're white, their supposed results are even more credible to blacks.     There's one at stanford that concluded, from a sample size of 5000 cases in one small region, that the US justice system was racist and treated blacks unfairly. Only they didn't bother to take into account other factors that would result in harsher sentences for blacks without being treated unfairly.    And they treated all crimes as equal, so two rapes committed by two different races, were treated equally, regardless of factors like plea bargains, a not guilty plea, the nature of the crime, if it included violence or extreme bodily harm, etc....none of that was factored in. So if a black guy raped a woman and beat her and caused a miscarriage, THAT was treated as the same crime as if a white man had just grabbed some woman in the alley and raped her without any significant bodily harm then went on his merry way.