  This is because the first group is about individual's BASIC RIGHTS,    The whole entire concept of universal human rights was created by White men...just so you know...so don't expect non-Whites to share the same cosmopolitan views:rolleyes:        In the past(1): Europeans had the best technology, therefore also the most power regarding imperialism ==&gt; Whites colonized much of the world.   We still do have the best technology:D          ^To collect it all: Today whites living in the following countries have no (nature)historically rights to the territories and therefore no ethnic rights in these areas:  Australia, New Zealand, United States of America, Canada, South Africa and some others.   To collect it all: Today non-Whites living in the following countries/regions have no (nature) historical rights to the territories and therefore no ethnic rights in these areas:  Western China(Xinjiang, the original inhabitants were White, believe it or not), Central Asia/the Caucasus, Anatolia(now called Turkey), North Africa, and Mesopotamia. The original inhabitants of all of these places were White whether you choose to accept it or not. You may disagree with me on Mesopotamia and North Africa. But it is mainstream now that present day Western China  https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t503937/  , Central Asia and the Caucasus were originally inhabited by Whites. And Anatolia should just go without saying for anyone with a basic knowledge of history.     Furthermore, Blacks, Orientals, South Asians and Arabs have no historical ethnic rights to be in North or South America, Australia or Europe, do they now? Also, Mexicans have no historical ethnic rights to be anywhere north of the Rio Grande. I don't remember Aztecs being as far north as Texas and California:rolleyes:       But remember: (Genetic-Tolerance + Basic human rights) &gt; Ethnic rights   Remember, universalbasic human rights are a concept of the White man and you would be foolish to expect non-Whites to hold these same beliefs.      Here are some few problems that the NATIVES MUST solve in order to get their Ethnic rights:   1) Huge non-Native immigration. 2) Huge non-Native numbers today 3) Huge non-Naive birthrates   Yes, this is a huge problem in Europe.        WN movement = Anti-human, racist, extreme, and dangerous.   :rolleyes::rolleyes:        Oppose WN.   We want to live in a society with other White racialists, THAT'S IT! So how exactly is this dangerous?:confused: :rolleyes: We want absolutely NOTHING to do with any non-Whites or White race traitors, we want a state, a territory, a frickin' island, a citistate, we just want a territory of our own to get the hell away from you hippy, communist, zionist, race mixing, anti-White psychos. We want to be removed from you idiots because your little multi-cult, ship of fools is about to sink! If we were to have a state or two like for instance Idaho, Montana, Nebraska, Iowa or Wyoming to call our own we would all go there and revel and bask in our Whiteness and laugh as the rest of the world descends into third world Hell and we say we told ya so! HA!! We just want to be left alone to live amongst other White racialists. Do you understand? We don't want to harm non-Whites, we don't want to rule over non-Whites, we want absolutely nothing to do with them, we just want them to leave us the hell alone! So I'm wondering, why do you think it would be dangerous for us to have our own society for White racialists only? Why are you opposed to us creating our own territory for White gentiles only? How is that dangerous or extreme? :rolleyes: You're anti-White! Face it!