Cosmopolitan culture seems to have a few archetypes that women find themselves trying to identify with...    Some women follow celebrity examples and aspire to expensive clothes, cosmetic procedures, and depending on fakery like hair extensions, heavy makeup, nails, etc. to transform their aesthetic beauty - YMMV - and sex appeal into their social commodity.    There's also the eternally-21 fitness woman who eats quinoa and avocados, wears a workout outfit that costs as much as a single person's monthly grocery budget for quinoa and avo's, and Downward-Dogs with her ombre tresses down - yet never to hang unflatteringly in her face. Personally, I think many people could take notes from her, but her commodity is still sex appeal, as evidenced by her Instagram belfies, or butt selfies    The archetypal female CEO has success on her mind. At 27, she has a condo, a BMW, a closet full of Louboutin and Choo, a contraceptive implant, and some frozen eggs for when she's ready to settle down. Naturally, she only wants one child, to spend AT LEAST the forecasted $20,000 a year on and completely cultivate their development with private school and a schedule up to the ears in activities...If she has any at all, because her parenting can't meet her own standards and the world is already overpopulated. I'm not sure what her main export is, but based on the contraceptive implant and the 6 heels...    Plus-size has become a nebulously-defined tribe for the SJWs to gather around a rally flag. Is she larger than a typical runway model? Is she average size? Is she...of significant size? No one really knows, but fat shaming is her nemesis and she believes a person's body size should not prevent them from doing anything a thinner person could. At the end of the day, boys like a little more booty to hold at night and her value is still mostly sex appeal.    Then...I see a head of self-cut, part-shaved, self-dyed green hair, and a face with no makeup - or makeup done purely for art-sake. Could it be, someone who doesn't market themselves as an object for recreational sex? I'm confused now. She believes women shouldn't be judged if they want to have as much sex as their sleaziest straw man, and that they should not be judged even if they want to dress beyond the stretchiest bounds of decency. If my suspicious are correct, this archetype exists in order to provide an illusion of choice: maybe HER value isn't sex, but her ideas perpetuate that women are good primarily for recreational, noncommittal sex.    -------------------------------------------------------    From the posts on Stormfront, I can tell that though a good portion of the community doesn't support women's rights in the most mainstream sense of the phrase, but it seems as though the WN community as a whole values women for qualities that are deeper, or more action-oriented. A woman's interest magazine, if published by Stormfront, would probably feature little content on fashion and sex, and more life-skills-related reading.    What do you think the archetype/s of the ideal WN woman is/are?