  Funeral Director? At what point does the director of a funeral home see the body, if at all?  What does the town barber and meter maid have to add to this? Oh, wait, they are not black, sorry .    exactly. he tries to make it a point that he didn't even know the context of what had happened, therefore has no bias in the case. but then why would he even bother to look for such a thing? he's obviously lying about not knowing the controversy behind the body he supposedly inspected. and yes, a funeral director has no business in the back having anything to do with the bodies. he's just a self righteous undercover racist looking for his 15 minutes of fame.    the only way you can tell by knuckles if someone has been fighting is if are red or the skin is cut from punching. but not every punch results in anything beyond a little redness in the knuckles. I recall a fight where I gashed the other guys eye and had zero damage to my knuckles. since black people are black, there will be no redness in the knuckles. it's easily possible to whoop someones ass and have nothing beyond a little redness in your knuckles. not only was he punching zimmerman, he was also bashing his head into the cement which wouldn't cause any visible damage to his hands.         and the real kicker is, if trayvon has zero indications of fighting on his body, that actually bolsters zimmermans story and defense.     it means zimmerman didn't punch him once, which backs up zimmermans claims of self defense. it proves that zimmerman was on the ground before he had a chance to fight back.     no matter who's side of the issue anyone is on, there's facts that remains irrefutable; trayvon was on top of zimmerman while zimmerman was on the ground, and that zimmerman shot trayvon at point blank range while he was on top of zimmerman.    the investigators aren't stupid, they already have a good idea of what went down and how it went down. they know the angle of the bullet when it was fired, which will prove zimmerman was not firing from a standing position. the bullet angle will either be too high or too low, meaning zimmerman would have to of been much taller or much shorter in order to have made such an angle when firing. that and the multiples of witnesses saying they saw trayvon on zimmerman, solidifies the truth.    and since there is no damage on trayvons body from fighting, it should raise the question of WHY trayvon was on top of zimmerman in the first place. if zimmerman didn't punch trayvon, then obviously trayvon had no reason for self defense, and had no reason to be on top of zimmerman.    the thing about all these people coming to defense of trayvon, is with every point they try to make, they actually weaken their own argument.