There are two mothers that may be called to the witness stand.  The ladies on the jury will see through the one, and empathize with the other.  The jury will peg Fulton for the disingenuous sloppy poor mother of the wretched monster. When O'Mara gets a hold of Fulton, he will treat her with kidskin gloves. Just enough to scrape away the mud and lies and expose her for what she is.  The jury will identify with Gladys Zimmerman, and the plea to grant justice to the fellow who was wronged will go to their instincts.   Gladys Z and the various witnesses for the defense will not be heard from until just before the jury finally gets to deliberations. To find out more about how that will play, see the psychology concept of the serial position effect recency vs primacy. O'Mara will demolish any advantage de la Rionda might have from going first, and the last thing on the jury's mind will be the emotional pleas of the mother of the true victim (Zimmerman)  Neither side got exactly what they wanted for a jury, since both sides dealt their strikes to the ones the other side would have wanted.  The disadvantaged side is the prosecution's side, since the jurors do not seem to be morons.  There is no way.. NONE.. that there will be a conviction with these 6 jurors. the problem isn't that there's females on the jury, the problem is that it's an ALL female jury. half of the jury are mothers. you won't find many mothers who will accept even a justifiable death of their children.     many mothers defend their children, even if they're rotten. just look at those two boys who were convicted of gang raping a girl. their mothers of all people, were beside them the WHOLE time defending them, even going as far as insisting the girl had it coming and was just a slut. So not only didn't they accept the truth, they made up excuses that lessen the severity of the crime in their eyes.     I've even seen it for myself many times. I remember having this neighbor once who had a black son of about 8 or so. her brother died and she got custody of his daughter, a 3 year old blond haired blue eyed white girl. that boy tortured that girl. he would intentionally hurt her left and right and try to lie about it, I'd see it for myself. once, he tried to push her out into the road into an oncoming car. it even got to the point where he was sexually molesting her, and even the mother confided he had done things to her.....YET through it all, she DEFENDED his little negro ass. made excuses. made the things he did seem like they weren't so bad. I called DCFS, made a statement, and they moved. never heard anything about them again. that poor girl had to suffer at the hands of a white mother and her negro child, while the mother ignored it. in her eyes, that was her son that she had to protect no matter what.    THIS is why an all female jury can be a problem, especially since they don't have arguments from a mans perspective when deciding. after all, it was a man being beaten and a mans reaction to the beating.    but the female jurors could identify with zimmerman, for example, in a rape scenario. they could picture an assault as akin to a rape in a sense, and they would them have to decide for themselves would I shoot someone trying to rape/assault me? would they deserve to be shot?.       the jury could definitely go either way.