When the politically correct use the term racist, they simply mean white Gentiles who discriminate.  It is a racial slur directed only at white Gentiles. Racist = honky, or honky-ish.  So, the translation of your quote would be: I think that was mostly just damage control after his little honky newsletter controversy...        While collective behavior is encouraged among Jews and nonwhites, and their right to promote discrimination when in their ethnic interests -- (and of course this is never called kike-ish behavrior, or ******-ish behavior, etc., by the politically correct) -- the demand of white Gentiles is to keep our hands tied behind our backs.  This is important. Given the predatory nature of our species, for any group to accept the ground rules during tribal conflict that they cannot have group defined leaders and cannot organize along group lines is dangerous and foolish, especially when the opposing tribes are encouraged to organize and follow leaders.  Imagine if the Iraqis accepted that in their conflict with the Americans that they cannot create organizations to counter it and must be leaderless. They can only fight as individuals, without Generals and Captains, etc., and must be devoid of any organizational structures.  You'd call them idiots.  Yet, those are the ground rules under political correctness, with the coalition that calls itself the minorities. They are encouraged to organize along racial lines, to follow racially defined leaders and to promote discrimination when in their ethnic interests -- while white Gentiles are immediately called honkys (racists) when they attempt the same and are punished.  In other words, when Jews and nonwhites organize along racial lines and follow racially defined leaders, they are never called kikes, ******s, spics, etc., and are never punished.  What is a racial slur? It is something directed only at one group, is meant to be derogatory, and its use is racially motivated. Someimes a racial slur is used against another group: a white could call another white a ******, but obviously he is not calling him black, but simply using it as a pejoritive.  This is the context whenever a Jew or nonwhite is called a racist. They are being described as acting like a honky, or being honky-ish.  99.99% of the time that you hear the word racist in the mainstream media, it is directed a white Gentile. On the rare occasion that it is directed at a Jew or nonwhite, it is usually not attached to their name.  Louis Farakhan isn't called the racist Louis Fakhan by the politically correct. When the term is directed his way, it is usually phrased some say Louis Farakhan is a racist. It suggests a mystery or confusion.  For even a man like Farakhan who represents a genocidal element within the black community, applying the term racist seems a source of confusion.  When Fuzzy Zoelller said fried chicken around Tiger Woods, nobody suggested Zoeller believed that the races evolved differently phsychologically, or that one race is superior to another. Fuzzy Zoeller became a bad white Gentile, one that did not know his place, and was forced to do the white man's crawl, because he directed perceived ethnic aggression towards a member of a race that is allowed to discriminate, an alpha race.  The only time Jews and nonwhites have the term racist directed their way, it is when they engage in some sort of street aggression, when they say something bad, or when they engage in physicial aggression for racially motivated reasons. (But usually they are not called racist for doing this, but rather that they did something racist, (something honky-ish).  That is largely irrelevent, given this term is not given to Jews and nonwhites when they organize along racial lines, follow racially defined leaders, or when they promote discrimination. Imagine if the ground rules were reversed and white Gentiles were encouraged to organize along racial lines, to follow racially defined leaders, and to discriminate when in our ethnic interests, and only had the term racist directed our way when we said something bad or punched someone on the nose for racially motivated reasons?  Then reverse it for Jews and nonwhites. Any Jew who supported the apartheid state of Israel would be imprisoned or fired from their job, (isn't that what they are doing in Europe to racists?) Chicano members of La Raza groups would face the same, and any black member of the NAACP, etc., or any nonwhite who supported the quota system.  Jews and nonwhites would have to be idiots to accept that. Well I realize that they only use the term racist against whites. I am on Stormfront aren't I? I'm well aware. Good post though.