(Article reprinted with permission.)    by James Buchanan  Believe it or not, the latest spin from the Zionist-controlled media is that George Zimmerman was not injured enough from the beating he took from Trayvon Martin to justify shooting Trayvon.    Injury and or blood on back of Zimmerman's head  A  reports “A surveillance video taken after a neighborhood watch volunteer killed a teen showed no injuries to the man, who said he acted in self-defense, ABC News said.”  “George Zimmerman, 28, has said he shot Travon Martin the night of Feb. 26 in a gated community in Sanford, Fla., after the unarmed 17-year-old punched him in the nose and knocked him down so his head hit the ground.”  First of all, the claim that “no injuries” can be seen is not true. Despite the graininess of the video and the fact that it was taken from a distance and in poor light, you can see a wound on the back of Zimmerman’s head as shown in the picture.  The claim that Zimmerman was “unscathed” is nothing but a bold-faced lie as dishonest as the pictures of Trayvon when he was eleven years old that the Zionist media circulated when this story first came out.  An a quotes an eyewitness John as saying “’The guy on the bottom (Zimmerman) who had a red sweater on was yelling to me: ‘help, help… and I told him (Trayvon) to stop and I was calling 911… When I got upstairs and looked down, the guy who was on top (Trayvon) beating up the other guy (Zimmerman), was the one laying in the grass, and I believe he was dead at that point.”  So we have an eyewitness testimony that Trayvon was beating up Zimmerman. We have statements in the police report that Zimmerman suffered head injuries and that paramedics treated him and wanted him to go to the hospital to get stitches. But now that a grainy police parking lot video has come out and the goriness of Zimmerman’s injuries are not clearly enough apparent to appease the liberals, the whole Al Sharpton circus is hoping that it will be able to keep the cries of “injustice” going for another week.  The relevant  contains the following “…a person is justified in the use of deadly force and does not have a duty to retreat if: (1) He or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony…”   Notice that there are no words to the effect that the person defending himself must lose three teeth, suffer four broken ribs and produce lots of bloody photographs of himself to appease the demands of liberals, who really don’t believe that White people have any right to defend themselves.  If a woman is afraid that a thug is about to drag her into the bushes to rape her or if a six foot three inch thug is charging at a much shorter individual, like Zimmerman, to violently assault him, the individual with the gun has every right to shoot the assailant by Florida’s “stand your ground” law even before they suffer ANY injuries.  If Trayvon had kept pounding Zimmerman’s head against the pavement, he could have suffered a fractured skull or a blood clot in his brain that could have killed him. There really is no credibility to any of the arguments that attempt to defend Trayvon. The Zionist media is deliberately inflaming this situation with slanted reporting and misinformation. The truth is that this was a justifiable shooting.   I like how they say he wasn't arrested, then use the video of him in cuffs as evidence for their cause. Hypocrisy much? Zimmerman was arrested and questioned, then released because they had nothing to charge him with.       I've got that covered and defeated already.      http://s11.postimage.org/zfoplzoyp/Untitled_2.png    Enhanced:     http://s7.postimage.org/gfa8gmzpl/Untitled_3.png      And the video is soo low quality you can't make out much of his face anyways:     http://s13.postimage.org/5k0mmk80l/Untitled_4.png    You can't tell for certain if someone has a broken nose or not by video of that quality. Yet they're treating it like it's their ace in the hole. But if you look closely it does look like his nose is swollen midway, and also looks like his right cheek is swollen compared to his left cheek.    Bruising can take several hours to a couple days to develop. Ever get a black eye? usually doesn't show up until the next day.     I wish zimmerman would step forward and tell his side of the story, and show pictures of how he looked the next few days after the incident.       oh and here's another outrageous development:    Funeral director: No injuries on Trayvon    Yes, that's right, a black funeral director tries to say trayvon didn't look like he was in a fight. Not a coroner, a black funeral director. Self righteous negroid trying to get his 15 minutes of fame. I bet even if he had acknowledged Trayvon has damage to his knuckles from fighting they would have twisted it as Trayvon fighting for his life. Trayvon has black skin, of course his knuckles wouldn't be red from punching someone.     The thing that is soo ridiculous about it is that all the witnesses say Trayvon was on top of Zimmerman punching him, including a black kid who witnessed it. So for him to insist Trayvon never threw a punch was just to give the black community for false facts as fuel. If only the black community can see what a circus they've turned this into, where whether facts point in one direction or the other, they attribute it to Trayvons benefit, which is a prime example of bias. Anyone will say anything they can to sway public opinion with lies in order to get revenge for the death of Thug Trayvon.     If Zimmerman has a trial and half the jury is black I'm going to **** bricks, because blacks make up 13% of the population.....NOT 50%. If you look at many racially charged cases, at least 3 of the jurors or more always are black. And they will NEVER vote not guilty in a racially charged case because they don't want to be labeled as the traitor who let them off the hook. So by default, a black juror will always vote guilty no matter what. Hopefully it doesn't get that far and the case gets thrown out as soon as they try to present it to a judge. From what I see, they don't have enough evidence to build a case against Zimmerman even *if* he was guilty.