They're only subtly twisting the story. They didn't hide the fact that the kid attacked the cop (but they barely showed the start of the attack).    What they're trying to get the cops on, is shooting at the car and busting out the window. From a legal perspective, they were completely within the right.     Let's look at it objectively. We have 1 person who is belligerent, and speeds off after a traffic stop with 5 kids in a car. Then once the car is stopped again, the person gets hostile, resists arrest, not to mention their kid attacks the cop for trying to arrest his mom...and he's not so much a kid, he was about as big as the cop. Then they get back into the car and speed off again.      These cops essentially have a police chase at hand. She was a fleeing criminal the moment she sped off the first time. And I don't know about you, but this woman has to be crazy to think that she can just speed off from officers with no consequences. That's enough to say that, yeah, she's an endangerment to not only the passengers in the car, but also to other people in general. That car can be assumed as a deadly weapon, and the cops had every right to shoot to try to stop her.    If they hadn't shot at her and she later flipped the car over killing all of the passengers, the police would be then getting flack for 'not doing enough'.