Anyone could have written that 'Manifesto'....and see Billy's response....get back to me when you can read and report on what was said in the manifesto please, -WP-  What I want is hard evidence, not conviction by press. Not 'everyone knows he did it because Fox, CNN and MSNBC told me a million times. That's not evidence. I want hard forensic evidence that the accused has killed someone. Not asking too much, and definitely NOT a libtard.  Do I think he probably did it? Yes, still, I want hard proof. if you look at this logically, there's too much pointing to his guilt.     first, if he was innocent, why would someone frame him years later after being fired? why go through the trouble?     second, if he was innocent, surely he would have some alibi. despite what the movies might show us, innocent people typically don't run, they stand their ground and prove their innocence, something that would be easy to do if they didn't have any actual evidence.     it's not like the guys daughter was murdered, and someone immediately pointed the finger at dorner without any evidence. he probably barely even remembered dorner since the case was years ago.     third, why would he torch his own truck? you could say he was again framed, but why?     I'm not inclined to believe there is some larger conspiracy here.     obviously evidence can't be released to the public right away in an ongoing investigation and manhunt. they obviously don't want dorner to know everything they know, or more importantly, what they might not know.    they keep talking about a search in bear county, but that's just to be thorough. they probably know he isn't there anymore, but want to make it look like they think he might be so that wherever he actually is, and if he's watching the news. he might loosen up and expose himself if he thinks they're looking somewhere he knows he's not.    sure questioning things is good, but over questioning something can be just as bad as not questioning it.    also if you want some insight into the relation between him and his partner:    http://articles.latimes.com/2013/feb/10/local/la-me-lapd-dorner-20130211/2 page 2.    even if she had kicked the man she was cuffing, it could have been an accident. if you're standing over someone trying to cuff them while they're struggling, you would need to get proper footing. even the result of the supposed kick, was so minor that it was barely worth mentioning. if he had been intentionally kicked, I'm sure there'd of been some major swelling. but that's all beside the point.        Evans denied kicking Gettler. She had been placed on desk duty for about seven months during the department's investigation and prevented from earning extra money outside the department. It was very difficult on me personally, she testified.  Dorner, she said, was having problems readjusting to police work after returning from a 13-month military deployment overseas. He told her that family members had noticed a change in him and that he would seek help for it, she testified. On one occasion, he started crying in their patrol car, she said.  On several evaluation forms, Evans rated Dorner as satisfactory but indicated he needed to improve in certain areas. At one point, she told him she would give him an unsatisfactory rating unless he improved. He was upset, she said.  Records show that Dorner reported the kicks a day after he received an evaluation in which Evans noted that he needed to show improvement in three categories, including the time it took to write reports, officer safety and use of common sense and good judgment.  She said Dorner had told her the department was a racist organization, which she said she reported to a supervisor. That supervisor, however, denied during the hearing that Evans told her that.  Three witnesses, including two hotel employees and a port police officer, testified that they did not see Evans kick Gettler. The port police officer recalled telling Dorner to fix his tie. But a photograph from the scene showed that Dorner was not wearing a tie.  The board's three members — two LAPD captains and a criminal defense attorney — unanimously ruled against Dorner. They found that his claims lacked credibility and that he was motivated in part by his fear that his training officer would give him a poor evaluation that could end his career.  To fire Dorner, the board had only to conclude that it was more likely than not that he had made up his story about the kick. From then on, it was up to Dorner to prove that the board was wrong, a burden that Yaffe and a subsequent appeals court found he did not meet.  Capt. Phil Tingirides, who chaired the board, declined to discuss specifics about the case, citing a state law that makes it a crime to disclose personnel information. But he defended his handling of the proceedings.  I am meticulous and objective, Tingirides said. I take the responsibility very seriously. Before his board I had never met Christopher Dorner and didn't know a thing about him. I went into that board with an open mind.... I am very comfortable with what we did and the way we did it.   this all gives insight into dorners actions and state of mind. doesn't it seem too convenient that his partner was warning him about his work performance, then all of a sudden his partner is accused of kicking a man by him? it looks pretty obvious that dorner was struggling and knew he was getting close to getting fired anyways. so instead, he decided to try to distract by making up anything he thought he could about his partner so 1) her credibility would be ruined when trying to report him for bad performance, and 2) to get rid of a partner he did not get along with.     since dorner talks about never having a family, he probably had problems with women all his life. a soldier/cop should have NO trouble finding a woman in this country, there's plenty of women just wet with anticipation for a man in uniform. I bet looking into his relationship past would show he had problems. my guess is he resented them, and did not treat them like equals. due to this, he probably felt degraded having a white female as a partner...like the department despised him and wasn't taking him seriously as a man or officer.    he probably felt betrayed by his partner for giving him an unsatisfactory review, so he felt the need to retaliate in any way he thought he could, only it backfired on him. that probably sent him over the edge, because he realized he got himself fired and couldn't live with that truth in his mind, so he lies to even himself about what really happened so he can try to live with it.    even if the kick was real, waiting until AFTER a bad work performance review just shows he was willing to keep hush hush until something negative happened to him, which in my eyes, would make him a bad cop either way. so either way he was in the wrong and there is no escaping that. dorner can't be on the good side of things no matter what side you believe, and that damns him.    we all know white racism, especially public racism, is pretty much dead in this country. whenever I hear a black person talk about being disparaged for their race their whole life and accusing many people of racism against them, I know right off the bat they're either lying to make excuses or mentally unstable. the only true racism in this country comes from minorities and immigrants towards whites, and they're socially ALLOWED to be open about it with zero consequences.     even now when I see many black people, they look at me as if I'm giving them the 'look', even if it's just a harmless glance with zero meaning. many black men walk around with this preconceived notion that when white people even so much as glance at them, they're automatically thinking that person is thinking harmful racist thoughts about them. hence the look you get from blacks. they think you're giving them the look, when in fact, they're the ones giving you the look. this is probably how dorner walked around, with race always on his mind due to his own insecurities. it's essentially a psychosis that many black men carry and it causes them to incorrectly perceive the world. the black community nurtures and indoctrinates their children from birth with this psychosis.