isn't it funny that they don't talk about the race of both people, even though it's a racially charged incident? we know the victims was white....but they never say that. I'm assuming the attacker was black...but again, they don't say that.    however, if the situation were reversed, and the kid being attacked was black, we'd have news about it left and right about how a racist white man attacked an innocent black teens. appalling, simply appalling.    on a side note, you know, hate crimes are a special law that gives an extra special sentence. I think that if such a law is going to exist, there should be a complimentary law that says if you falsely accuse someone of a race crime, you should do some serious time.     there's too many double standards against whites in this world. it's refreshing to see them label the white kid as the victim for once, but is that how it's going to turn out in the end?     for all we know, it could change to where the man who attacked him gets legally justified by some libtard judge, and the kid ends up having to pay him reparations. at least, that's what the black community would like to see happen.     even if the kid used racial slurs, that's no reason to get physically violent. but the 'groids don't understand that, and frankly, they don't care either.