On XX/XX/XXXX I disputed XXXX accounts as inaccurate/incomplete with specificity as to what wasinaccurate/ incomplete.on XX/XX/XXXX the investigation was completed with '' new information '' ( documents XXXX & XXXX ) .Both accounts are delinquent charge-offs and do not supply the basic '' date of first delinquency '', as required by FCRA.BOTH do not include the amount of lastpayment and other incomplete inaccurate info. ( documents XXXX XXXX ) .The creditors do not specify these items to completely report because it would then be calculable that both creditors charged penalty fees in excess of those allowable by the XX/XX/XXXX CREDIT CARD ACTwhich was fully implemented just prior to the opening of both accounts.I believe both creditors do not want to be paid ... ..because in writing off excessive illegal fees they make more moneythan if I would pay only the charges allowed by law ... ..so they earn more defrauding the tax authorities and the public.TRANSUNION should have deleted both accounts but they do notbecause the creditors are their customers and pay them to collude.TRANSUNION ISNOT ALLOWED TO REPORT INCOMPLETE /INACCURATE INFORMATION afterinvestigation, especially obvious, on the face of the record items.