I received letters from Wright Lerch & Litow ( Indiana ) in XXXX and XXXX stating that I owe a debt in the amount of {$3900.00}. I disputed the debt in XXXX and XXXX. XXXX XXXX, Wright Lerch & Litow filed suit in Indiana Small Claims Court. XXXX XXXX, there was a hearing I denied the debt. I asked for Discovery and found out that XXXX and XXXX ( Not Located in Indiana ) are actually suing me. AT NO TIME did Wright Lerch & Litow make it known that they are representing XXXX. One of the documents from Wright Lerch & Litow, states the client is XXXX XXXX XXXX and the Original Creditor is XXXX Bank. Another document from XXXX XXXX of XXXX Bank dated XXXX XXXX, XXXX states " findings were forward to Attorney XXXX XXXX XXXX. Never XXXX has any of XXXX Bank 's documents listed XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX as the attorney. I requested " terms and agreement, '' contract between Wright Lerch & Litow and XXXX Bank, contract between Wright Lerch & Litow and XXXX XXXX XXXX and between XXXX Bank and XXXX XXXX XXXX. I have not received any documents giving Wright Lerch & Litow or XXXX XXXX XXXX the legal right to sue me. There is no contract, terms and agreement, no credit card statements for XXXX, XXXX and XXXX they ca n't provide me with any proof of transactions XXXX, XXXX, and XXXX. Wright Lerch & Litow FAILED to name all necessary party and misrepresentation. I do not know who the real lawyer is and feel it is illegal practice.