TransUnion has several systemic issues in addressing consumer complaints. :1 ) If new information or documentation is provided regarding a dispute, TU automatically claims the dispute is frivolous as the " account '' has already been verified. 

2 ) While TU may not be required to investigate information from judgments/public records, they should at least make certain the information matches the public records! 
3 ) TU is not considering the original date of delinquency to establish the date the item will be removed. 

I have included the public records that clearly states the " filing date '' of a judgment is XX/XX/XXXX and the filing date on my TU report ( also included ) states XX/XX/XXXX. The other CRAs immediately removed this item when I brought it to their attention. After XXXX dispute attempts with TU ( most recent dispute attached ), I have decided filing a complaint is my best course of action. 

This error on my TU report is preventing me from purchasing property. This is unfair and is in violation of the FCRA. 

Thank you for your consideration, XXXX XXXX