Fair Collections and Outsourcing ( FCO ), a debt collector and assigned agent of the original creditor, XXXX XXXX XXXX, has been attempting to collect a claimed debt of {$3500.00} for various charges associated with my rental of an XXXX apartment at the XXXX XXXX facility in XXXX XXXX California. 

FCO has provided as evidence of the debt, a '' resident Journal '' that depicts debit and credit transactions and ending balance. The problem with this XXXX page report is that @ XXXX % of the report is blurred beyond readability, and the ending perpetual balance does not follow from the transactions, but rather is stated seperately on a page not of the transaction report, and in a different typeset. The report as given is useless for purposes of debt validation. 

FCO is reporting the claimed debt to XXXX, who is reporting it as a delinquent item in collections. 

I have sent to FCO a copy of the report I received from them, pointing out the unreadable areas, and requesting a fully readable version. I also requested that they provide the name and contact information of authorizing and approving agent at XXXX XXXX Communities. 

In response, I received a letter from FCO stating they have " verified '' the debt and will continue reporting it to the CRA, FCO did not respond to any of the requests I made for a competent validation of the debt, and identity of the source of the data.