In XXXX of XXXX a citation was attempted to be served to XXXX XXXX XXXX, my mother, and again in XXXX XXXX - the citation is not signed but the officer showed it was served ( with only XXXX attempts instead of the required XXXX prior to leaving citation on the door - I am assuming because XXXX was unable to answer the door ). The law firm filing the lawsuit was XXXX, XXXX, XXXX and XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, Texas XXXX. No further action was taken and in XXXX several attorneys working for the above law firm left that firm and set up an operation under Jenkins, Waggins and Young law firm also located in XXXX and a copy of their judgement is provided for address and contact information. Their phone number is XXXX XXXX XXXX and XXXX is " the '' person that talks to people there. There was no action taken on the original suite from XXXX XXXX up until around XXXX XXXX wherein the new law firm represented that they were authorized to file a judgement and that they were representing the law firm under the original citation ( XXXX, XXXX, XXXX and XXXX ) even though they were not according to that law firm and in addition, they filed without giving notice to the estate of XXXX XXXX XXXX whom had died almost 19 months prior to their action to file for judgement. I believe that the timeline for filing motions for any debts is within XXXX year of the time of death. There was no notification to the estate of the debt and there was no probate or administration for the estate as the value of the estate is none. The collection efforts are at best deceptive and unfair - there was - these folks were not the people who issued the suit originally and are attempting to collect on an old citation that the original debt collector says they no longer are working. The firm did not serve any additional citation or notification to the address or to the estate or even individual prior to the judgement action - so there was no opportunity to validate or defend the debt. And there are possible leches concern, statute of limitations on the suit. In addition, the address on the citation and judgement is incorrect, they filed that judgement action after the XXXX year timeline allowed for collection of the debt AND attempts to call and discuss the situation with them has not been received well. They refuse to discuss the situation with me but spend a great deal of time gathering data.