On Wednesday, XXXX XXXX of 2015, I was in receipt of a " Warrant In Debt '' which was serviced by a XXXX party service provider, XXXX This packet alleges I acquired an account from XXXX XXXX Bank which has been charged off due to non-payments. With review of the document ( s ), the debt has been sold a total of XXXX times ( i.e. XXXX ; XXXX, XXXX ; XXXX, XXXX ; Midland Funding ). Due to the recent sale, the new owner, Midland Funding placed the account / file with an attorney firm which they 've prepared the file to seek judgment against me within the state of Virginia ( Docket Number : XXXX ; their case file number : XXXX ) and I have absolutely no knowledge of this debt. Speaking of Midland Funding and the attorney representation - once a debt buyer and/or creditor purchases a debt then they have up to 30 days to issue a Demand / Dunning letter, and if the debt is to be serviced / collected on the companies behalf through Contingency or Legal strategies then a Demand / Dunning letter is required to be issued to the respective individual several days after placement. In result of such, I was never given an opportunity to dispute any of their claims since a demand letter was not provided and I did not find out about such debt until I was in receipt of the " Warrant In Debt ''. I have a permanent hardship which is not the businesses rights to know my medical history, but these measures are unfair and I 'm being taken advantage of when I did not acquire a debt from XXXX. I seriously do not need to go through litigation for illegal practices on behalf of the new owner and the XXXX party vendor / attorney. To the point - this is not a debt acquired by myself.