I have a XXXX XXXX XXXX account that is past the 7 year statute of limitations to report on my XXXX credit file. Midland credit management, the company which bought the debt, has re-aged the account to increase the time the can try and collect on the debt. Re-aging is not allowed under the FCRA and is a violation of my consumer rights. XXXX closed the account in XXXX and it was XXXX delinquent in XXXX of XXXX. The XXXX delinquency is the only date and standard for the 7 year reportable status. Based on this information, provided by XXXX XXXX XXXX, this debt is no longer reportable on my credit file yet MIdland is trying to report the first major delinquency as XXXX. This would be impossible as the XXXX account was closed in XXXX. A simple internet search will show, while Midland claims otherwise, that Midland has a poor track record of adhering to FCRA guidelines and has been subject to XXXX in fines. Their questionable collection tactics have continually violated consumers rights to maximize their profit. I Have filed complaints with the XXXX, CFPB, and California Attorney Generals 's office, yet Midland asserts that they do not re-age accounts. It only takes XXXX look at my documents provided by XXXX and XXXX to see that this statement is false and Midland has violated my consumer rights.