On XXXX XXXX, 2015 Transunion Information Services received documents for the purpose of establishing the fact of forgery, in addition to request the accounts be blocked pursuant but not limited to section 605B of the Fair Credit Reporting Act 15 U.S.C. 1681C-2. I received correspondence from Transunion that is confusingly pleaded. ( See : Attachment A ) The company has denied my private right to remedy as a victim of identity theft. Transunion has failed to go beyond a cursory investigation into this matter. Moreover, the XXXX Circuit Court of Appeals recently confirmed that a reasonable reinvestigation " must mean more than simply ... making only a cursory investigation into the reliability of information that is reported to potential creditors. See : XXXX v. Trans Union, XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX ( XXXX XXXX ) ( citing XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX ). Additionally, all relevant documents were sent to Transunion to provide proof of claim such as ; an official police report, FTC Affidavit, FTC Complaint number, US Postal Inspectors ID Theft Report Number and proof of Identity. I request a reinvestigations of the following information pursuant but not limited to the FCRA 611 ( 15 U.S.C. 1681i ) ; XXXX XXXX XXXX # XXXX XXXX # XXXX XXXX XXXXThe referenced accounts were made without my knowledge, consent, and or authorization. I never signed nor endorsed any contracts or applications that created any accounts for debt service with the listed corporations, agencies, or companies. I have received no benefit or value from the proceeds of the endorsement ( s ), contract ( s ), application ( s ) and or the listed account ( s ) directly or indirectly and I request the accounts to be blocked pursuant but not limited to section 605B of the Fair Credit Reporting Act 15 U.S.C. 1681C-2.