I XXXX XXXX, XXXX, residing at XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX does hereby state for the record that Wells Fargo Bank , N.A . is in violation of my rights under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act for trying to extend the timeline of a judgment that is no longer enforceable from the original state where it was procured. All documentation to my complaint is attached, proving that a foreign judgment, although enforceable from XXXX, the terms of the judgment validity still is maintained in the original state. Without exception, the XXXX judgment was filed in 2008, and under terms of XXXX General Laws was only enforceable for five ( 5 ) years, unless the judgment was renewed. In this instance, the judgment was never renewed, even after Wells Fargo through legal representation filed a foreign judgment in the state XXXX. XXXX has a ten ( 10 ) year timeline of judgments being enforceable, XXXX has a five ( 5 ) year timeline. The timeline is not extended because XXXX has different guidelines for judgment enforcements. If filing foreign judgments in states that have a longer enforcement guideline were legitimate to extend the life of a judgment, then banks would file foreign judgments XXXX, where judgments are enforceable for twenty ( 20 ) years. The logic of Wells Fargo may look good on paper, but I have attached the necessary exhibits to prove beyond a doubt, that Wells Fargo is re-aging a debt validation from state to state illegally. The XXXX judgment is no longer valid, which equates to the XXXX judgment now being invalid.