I want to know why XXXX was hit with a consent order in XXXX and told that employees of the debt collector could not testify in court as custodian of records as to the validity of the documents, and therefore not have the documents submitted into evidence, it is still allowed in XXXX? Specifically by Absolute Resolutions. A debt buyer that uses it 's own employee, XXXX XXXX, to testify as custodian of records for debt that originated with XXXX XXXX.