I agreed to a XXXX procedure. I dispute the balance from the procedure because I did not get what I requested. The physician in question offered to repeat the procedure to give me the desired outcome. Why would I agree to pay XXXX for something that it is obvious the physician could not perform? It may be a good business model for the physician but in my opinion, it 's deceptive advertising. 

I offered to settle the disputed amount for less. Their response was to report a higher amount as a collection item to XXXX.