Performant recovery is the designated collector for the Department of Treasury. They instituted a XXXX without following the provisions of 31 U.S.C. 3720 D ( b ) ( XXXX ) by providing notice of their intent to start the XXXX proceedings. The debt is owed to the XXXX XXXX XXXX who have had my XXXX, SD XXXX address since the year XXXX. The Department of Treasury has also had that address as my tax returns reflected that address since the year XXXX. Instead Performant made up an address of XXXX, SD. I have never resided at XXXX XXXX XXXX. We only received street addresses a little XXXX and my new street address is XXXX XXXX XXXX. Then when I requested a hearing on the matter they never gave me Notice of the Hearing and they will not address the fact that they violated my due process rights under the statute. Since Performant has the sole power to request the hearing they are abusing their position by not forwarding my objections to the Administrative Law Judge. Performant 's predecessor engaged in robo signing activities and I am sure that is what happened here. I am recovering from XXXX XXXX and have missed doctor appointments because this money is coming out of my check because my doctors are XXXX miles away from where I live. Performant also refuses to give me an accounting of payments on this debt. I am just seeking the opportunity to negotiate the payments to an amount that I can afford without having to miss XXXX appointments.