I believe car-share company XXXX and debt collection agency Transworld Systems violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act : a ) by making false statements on XXXX notices mailed to my address ; b ) because of Transworld 's inability to retrieve the debt account from its internal computer system to assist me ; c ) because of Transworld 's admission that it has no jurisdiction/authority over the debt, and d ) because of XXXX 's attempt to deceive ( mislead ) me into believing that Transworld was contacting me to collect a debt that would be applied to my credit report. 

Following are my top concerns : XXXX of the XXXX notices received reads : " This is sent to you by a collection agency. " o This is false. If it were true, the Transworld representative would have been able to help me. ( Image included ). 
The XXXX letters does not contain what is called a " XXXX XXXX XXXX. " o The field is blank. According to the Transworld representative, this was XXXX of the primary indicators that illustrate Transworld has no authority over the debt. ( Image included ). 
XXXX of the XXXX letters received read : " This account has been placed with our agency for collection. " o This is false. Transworld could not access the debt in its internal computer system ( no record existed ) and could not help me ... and subsequently sent me back to XXXX ( who refused to undertake my dispute ). ( Image included ). 
XXXX of the XXXX letters received read : " Please be advised that we have been authorized to pursue collection ... '' o This is false. Again, Transworld indicated it had no jurisdiction over the debt and could not help me. ( Image included ). 

I have included a full ( comprehensive ) statement to provide more information considering the character limit on this text box. 

*Please note that I believe the improper communication tactic is grounded in making false statements.