XXXX XXXX XXXX sent a " dunning '' letter to consumer dated XX/XX/XXXX on law firm letterhead which violates the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act ( " FDCPA '' ) 15 U.S.C. 15 Section 1692e and 1692f. The law firm commits a number of violations in the letter. The XXXX XXXX notes that " dunning '' letters ( sent on law firm letterhead ) that contain offers to settle 'time-barred ' debt misleads unsophisticated consumers as to the legal status of the debt and violates the FDCPA. Consumer recognizes the debt XXXX XXXX XXXX is attempting to collect is over Nebraska 's 4 year statute-of-limitations ( SOL ) law for debt collection. Consumer does not wish continued communication with XXXX XXXX XXXX after this formal ( dispute ) complaint is lodged with the CFPB as the complaint will be tendered as evidence in a court proceeding if necessary. Consumer makes known that - if an agency ( or law firm ) incorporates the use of form collection demands on attorney letterhead the agency ( or law firm ) MUST incorporate " meaningful attorney involvement '' into its collection process ; 15 U.S.C. Section 1692e and XXXX vs Law Offices of XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, No. XXXX. XX/XX/XXXX - XXXX XXXX XXXX. If XXXX does not cease contact with Consumer by mail/phone/email consumer will file a state and federal lawsuit against the entity for violations of the FDCPA, FCRA and TCPA. Consumer thanks the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ( CFPB ) for providing this venue as a viable avenue of documentation and mediation. It is greatly appreciated.