hat
9. "De facto" élimine dwa pou yo tankou pwive, ki sa pou materyèl kopi yon sipò fizik, pratike pwèske ki pa-inexistante nan laj digital. Tankou pwive nan yon travay yon legal ki te egziste e ki kontinye devan entènèt la, e li pwal kontinye egziste yo a apwè refòm sa a. Fiscales yon barik, tankou pwive ekivalan a enpoze rekosyon kont maladi peye chak sitwayen pou yon itilize kriminèl ipotetik, menm si sa pa janm rive. Criminaliser kliyan pou de rezon se pa chemen an.
eng
9. "De facto" eliminates the right to private copying, linking it to the material copy of a physical support, practice is almost non-existent in the digital age. Private copying of a work is a legitimate that existed before the internet, and it will continue to exist after this reform. Taxing a barrel, private copying is equivalent to impose preventive fined each citizen to a hypothetical criminal use, even if this never happens. Criminalize the consumer for fundraising purposes is not the way.