hat
Istwa a, pou tout ti detay li genyen ladan li, toute pas detay ki pi enpòtan. Akote revandikasyon nan mesaj sa planing te enplike, genyen aktyèlman pa gen ankenn endikasyon ke sa se ka a. Anfèt, istwa li menm assez netral, bay okenn pwèv sou kesyon ou non li te itilize correctifs. Istwa a tou pratique pas medikal nan istwa fanmi l' ak l' genyen, se poutèt sa, pa gen okenn endikasyon ki konnen si ou non l' nan ankenn une risk pou kou ak ti boul san. Menm si li te itilize yon pansman, pa gen okenn evidans ki sikjere mèt ke li te yon faktè réel touye l' dèyè a espekilasyon ki te pwezante nan yon fen a mesaj. Pou pati ki plis, pèp la te fè a ap envestige te twouve ke yon doktè Nicole McKeon te mouri, men istwa medikal konfidansyalite lwa a yo nan jwenn plis.
eng
The story, for all the detail it contains, subtly lacks the most important details. Aside from claims in the message that birth control was involved, there are actually no indications that this is the case. In fact, the story itself is fairly neutral, providing no evidence on whether or not she was using patches. The story also conveniently omits her family's medical history and her own, so there is no indication of whether or not she was at any increased risk for strokes and blood clots. Even if she was using a patch, there is no evidence to suggest that it was an actual factor in her death beyond the speculation presented at the end of the message. For the most part, the people that did the investigating found that a Dr. Nicole McKeon did die, but medical history confidentiality laws prevented them from finding out more.