hat
Pou moun k ap chèche jwenn nan nan Dekrè jelazyèn kèk konpwomi nan enfayibilite papal, li ta dwe eksplike ke ki entèdi a nan yon liv pa gen anyen fè ak enfayibilite Pap la depi li se senpleman yon aksyon disiplinè, pa konekte ak defini nan dogmatik. Pa nati, yon aksyon disiplinè se sijè a chanjman. Li kanpe nan plas sèlman toutotan menas la konnen egziste; yon fwa ke menas la pase, se entèdiksyon an leve. Nan ka sa a an patikilye, kòm canon a nan Bib la te grandi nan aksepte menas la poze pa Apokrif la dekline ak entèdiksyon an te vin demode.
eng
For those seeking to find in the Gelasian Decree some compromise of Papal Infallibility, it should be explained that the banning of a book has nothing to do with the Pope’s infallibility since it is merely a disciplinary action, not connected with the defining of dogma. By nature, a disciplinary action is subject to change. It stands in place only so long as the perceived threat exists; once the threat has passed, the censure is lifted. In this particular case, as the canon of the Bible grew in acceptance the threat posed by the Apocrypha waned and the ban became obsolete.