hat
"... Li se toujou nesesè, al gade nan Konstitisyon an, nan nivo a ArtikAtik 11 ki tnu sitwayen yo gen kat idantifikasyon nasyonal yo. Mwen menm mwen te remake, ki di ke gen ArtikAtik 3 ki tnu eta a ba ou yon kat idantifikasyon nasyonal . Se konsa, ki te gen de obligasyon: obligasyon a nan sitwayen yo retire kat yo, men tou, yon obligasyon nan Eta a bay desizyon kat la Nan ranpli obligasyon sa a prensipal anba ArtikAtik 11, Garry Conille te mande kat idantifikasyon nasyonal li mwen pa kapab.? reponn, gen yon sètifika ki soti nan oni la ki jistifye sa ki te sitwayen yo mande a kat idantifikasyon nasyonal li, reyalite a, se sa li ye, se konsa byen lwen nou pa wè kat sa a nan folder nan "
eng
"...It is still necessary to refer to the Constitution, at the level of Article 11 which obliges the citizens to have their national identification card. I also note, that there is Article 3 which obliges the state to issue a national identification card. So there are two obligations: the obligation of citizens to withdraw their card, but also an obligation of the State to issue the card. In fulfilling this primary obligation under Article 11, does Garry Conille had requested his national identification card ? I can not answer, there is a certificate issued by the ONI that justifies that the citizen had requested his national identification card, the reality, is what it is, so far we do not see this card in the folder"