hat
Lwa entansyonèlman modelize kòm, ki “lejislatè” Li te dwat, Ak fè espre manke atik “krim pwovokasyon”. Pa trete ka sa yo, ki li menm pouvwa fòse sitwayen yo komèt krim, olye de sa, li reklamasyon, ki viktim nan se kòz pou blame pou domaj la, kidonk lakòz l 'menm plis, kraze kònen. Epi kòm yon pist artistik woule l 'nan konsekans asfalt ak pinisyon. Kidonk, ogmante distans ki genyen ant kòz la(pwòp fòt) ak efè(pinisyon “Azazèl”), kidonk etabli vanyan sòlda konplè pè lè panse sou, ke jij la sa a koupab paske. Se yon sèl sèlman lalwa “krim pwovokasyon” byen lage nan nenpòt ki fòm nan krim soti nan gen egziste. ( Atik. 275-360 UKRF, st.356-465 UKRB, 109-114,328-447 UKU, 220-250, 720-814 UKSŞA)
eng
The laws intentionally simulated as, to “the legislator” was right, and intentionally missing article “provocation of crimes”. Not to treat those cases, in which the power forcing citizens to commit crimes, but instead she claims, that was the victim of harm, to put it more, crushing blow. And as a skating rink in her asphalt roll their consequences and punishments. Thus increasing the distance between the cause(own fault) and the consequence(punishment “the scapegoat”), thereby establishing the mighty comprehensive fear when thinking about how, that's to blame, judge. Only one law “the provocation of crimes” would reliably delivered any form of crime need to be. ( calendar. 275-360 UKRF, Article 356-465 UKRB, 109-114,328-447 UCU, 220-250, 720-814 UKSŠA)