hat
Se sèk jeneral la te fè leve nan moun ki te eksprime ak montre angajman alontèm nan pwojè a ak satisfè regilyèman ede pataje enfòmasyon ant gwoup travay yo ak pran desizyon ki bezwen opinyon tout moun. Pwogram, fonksyone, ak kontinyèl mobilizasyon gwoup travay yo rankontre souvan jan sa nesesè. De pli zan pli, nou eseye transfere desizyon an pou echèl 'lokal yo' posib ("Sibvansyelite"), sa vle di plis desizyon yo te fè nan pi piti gwoup k ap travay, pa moun ki pi pre pwoblèm lan ak pi afekte pa solisyon an, olye ke sèk la an jeneral. Konsantman se mo operasyon an. Nou eseye pa vote, men rive nan yon rezilta mityèlman satisfezan pou tout patisipan yo. Si youn pa konfòtab ak yon desizyon, yo idantifye ak pwopoze altènativ nouvo. Olye de kesyon an, "Èske mwen dakò ak sa a 100%", souvan kesyon an se "Èske mwen ka ok ak sa a?" Menm jan enpòtan, se yon efò tou te fè yo pataje pouvwa pou pran desizyon ak moun ki chape nan dezas ki afekte lè yo nan tout. posib.
eng
The general circle is made up of people who have expressed and shown long-term commitment to the project and meets regularly to help share information between working groups and make decisions that need everyone’s input. Program, operational, and ongoing mobilization working groups meet as frequently as needed. Increasingly, we try to devolve decision-making to the ‘localest’ scale possible (“Subsidiarity”), meaning more decisions are made within smaller working groups, by those closest to the problem and most impacted by the solution, rather than the general circle. Consent is the operative word. We try not to vote, but arrive at a mutually satisfactory outcome for all participants. If one is not comfortable with a decision, they identify and propose new alternatives. Rather than the question, “Do I agree with this 100%”, often the question is “Can I be ok with this?” Just as important, an effort is also made to share decision-making power with affected disaster survivors when at all possible.