hat
Kritik bonè yo te konsène ke nenpòt ki dyagnostik fòmèl ta dwe itilize pathologise minorite seksyèl ak altènatif pratik seksyèl. Sepandan, pou rankontre kritè dyagnostik pou CSBD, konpòtman pwoblèm lan dwe lakòz pèsistans ki gen orijin ki make oswa yon andikap enpòtan nan pèsonèl, fanmi, sosyal, edikasyon, okipasyonèl, oswa lòt zòn enpòtan nan fonksyone. Nan lòt mo, dyagnostik nan nouvo pa fè dyagnostik pasyan ki baze sou Ki sa ki konpòtman seksyèl yo angaje yo lib. Li dyagnostike pasyan ki baze sou andikap ki pèsistan ak detrès. Si konpòtman seksyèl, kèlkeswa fòm li pran, rezilta ni, nouvo dyagnostik la pap aplike.
eng
Early critics were concerned that any formal diagnosis would be used to pathologise sexual minorities and alternative sexual practices. However, to meet the diagnostic criteria for CSBD, the problematic behaviour must cause persistent marked distress or significant impairment in personal, family, social, educational, occupational, or other important areas of functioning. In other words, the new diagnosis doesn’t diagnose patients based on what sexual behaviour they freely engage in. It diagnoses patients based on persistent impairment and distress. If sexual behaviour, whatever form it takes, results in neither, the new diagnosis will not apply.