hat
8. Canon sa a, akize pou bidjè a jeneral leta ak kantite pa detèmine pa yon lwa, Sa bagay pou detriman nan otè yo sa yo merite sèlman e li enplike yon don covert piblikatè, ki dènye, dènye modèl. 2 la directive a 2001 pwopriyete intellectuelle pa gen tankou bénéficiaires de pwopwiyete diskisyon entèlektyèl, ak sa Malgre sa a n' a la 45% Ranmase kèt bwa sèd. Important se sa la formulation de lwa a an relasyon sèlman a 'kiltirèl endistri yo' expressément poutèt yo inyore "otè yo", anmegdan yon sitiyasyon ki deja te kòmanse jounalis yo an favè piblikatè dwa moun ki pa fè "presse" (rezime près).
eng
8. This canon, charged to the general budget of the State and amount not determined by law, It acts to the detriment of the just reward authors and it involves a covert publishers grant, who art. 2 of the directive 2001 of property intellectual not includes as beneficiaries of intellectual property rights, and that despite this are the 45% Cedar collection. Significant is that the wording of the law refers only to the 'cultural industries' expressly ignoring "the authors", aggravating a situation that already began with the loss of rights of journalists in favor of publishers by making "clippings" (press summaries).