hat
Anplis de sa nan kesyon sa yo syantifik, jis jou apre yo fin pibliye papye sa a nan Pwosesis Akademi Nasyonal Syans , te gen yon eskandal menmen nan tou de chèchè yo ak laprès la (mwen pral dekri agiman yo nan deba sa a nan plis detay nan chapit 6 ). Pwoblèm ki te soulve nan deba sa a te lakoz jounal la pibliye yon "ekspresyon editoryal enkyetid" ki ra sou etik yo ak pwosesis revizyon etik la pou rechèch la (Verma 2014) .
eng
In addition to these scientific questions, just days after this paper was published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, there was an enormous outcry from both researchers and the press (I’ll describe the arguments in this debate in more detail in chapter 6). The issues raised in this debate caused the journal to publish a rare “editorial expression of concern” about the ethics and the ethical review process for the research (Verma 2014).