Recommendation to authorize City Manager to execute agreements with Blair Commercial Real Estate, Inc., Cresa Partners of Los Angeles, Inc., Cushman & Wakefield of California, Inc., and Lee & Associates Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., South Bay, for "as-needed" real estate broker services, in an aggregate total amount not to exceed $200,000, for a three-year term, and to execute any necessary amendments to the agreements relative to extending the terms for up to one additional year, changing the contract dollar amounts, authorizing additional services, if required, within the provisions of the agreements, and adjusting the fee schedules for inflation, all within the aggregate total amount of $200,000; and Authorize City Manager, or designee, to execute listing agreements, and any other necessary documents with Blair Commercial Real Estate, Inc., Cresa Partners of Los Angeles, Inc., Cushman & Wakefield of California, Inc., and Lee & Associates Commercial Real Estate Services Inc - South Bay, for the listing of City-owned property as needed, for a term not to exceed 12 month
Is a recommendation to authorize the city manager to execute four as needed. Real Estate Broker Services Agreement with four commercial real estate firms in amount not to exceed $200,000 so moved. There is a Councilman Lipski. I think Vice Mayor. Mr. Parkin, I understand there was a comment to the clerk about the concern that the city is contracting with black commercial real estate and that its principal is on our planning commission, and that they raised the issue of conflict of interest as the city utilizes their services but then has a planning commissioner. So I'm wondering if you could address that, because that was brought to the clerk's. It was one of the comments on online with the clerk. Members of the council. Yes, we received that comment and we are looking at that. We believe that there is not a 1090 violation. We've had this situation in the past with architects who have served on the planning commission and then have applied for other various work with the city. The issue is, as we see it right now and will continue. If anything changes, we will certainly notify the Council. But the if there was work that was provided to Blair real estate and Mr. Blair is over 51% of the company, then she would be required to recuse herself on any action. A city item that came before the Planning Commission. This could and has in the past created a problem with a quorum on the Planning Commission. But as we currently understand the facts, it would not raise a 1090 violation. Can I ask if if at some point certainly you could send a memo just back outlining that so that it's very clear if there's other people that have questions about it that you've you know, you're absolutely vetted. We will do that. Yes. We appreciate it. Because that hadn't been moved. Was there a motion that's been moved and seconded? Any public comment on that? I'm hearing no public comment. Members, cast your votes. I am? Yes. Motion carry said vote yes. Item number 19, the clerk will read. Her 19 is a report from Technology Services and Financial Management with with recommendation to exit contracts with federal CIGNA Signals Safety and Security Systems of University Park, Illinois for the furnishing and delivering a video, surveillance cameras and related system components the amount not to exceed 500,002nd.