Corrects the legal description of the legislative map amendment that rezoned property from C-CCN, PUD, or C-MU-10 with waivers and conditions to proposed zone districts C-CCN-4, C-CCN-5, C-CCN-7, C-CCN-8, or C-CCN-12 in Council District 10. (NEIGHBORHOODS & PLANNING) Corrects the legal description of the legislative map amendment that rezoned property from C-CCN, PUD, or C-MU-10 with waivers and conditions to proposed zone districts C-CCN-4, C-CCN-5, C-CCN-7, C-CCN-8, or C-CCN-12 in Council District 10. The Committee approved filing this bill by consent on 12-11-14.
One nay. 1025 has been placed on final consideration and pass. All right. We are moving on to our last public hearing of the night, 1076. Councilwoman Fox, could you please put 1076 on the floor? Certainly, Mr. President, I know the Council Bill 1076 be placed upon final consideration and do pass. But it has been moved and seconded. The public hearing for a council bill 1076 is now open. May we have the staff report? Good evening, Kyle. Kyle Dalton again with community planning and development. I'm pinch hitting for tonight for Sarah Showalter, my capable but ill colleagues. So I will give her the credit for a very brief presentation here at the end of the day. This rezoning request is to correct a technical error in the Cherry Creek North rezoning we did at the end of October in 2014. It's been initiated by our department community planning and development, and it clarifies that areas of land that were formerly rights away, that have been long since vacated, were included in the legislative re rezoning action that you took in October 2014. There's a this is a technical correction to the legal description in the ordinance that described that zoning we did back in October. It's in Council District ten in the Cherry Creek North area. This map that's in your packet shows the specific alleys and streets that were platted but have long since been vacated that are private property today and that were intended to be included in that rezoning in October 2014. And this just clears that up in all of the properties that are to be clarified that they were zoned in October are going to the same zoning that surrounds them, that that entire private property that they're adjacent to enjoys already. But even though it's just a technical error, it requires all of the process of a rezoning other than going to planning board. So it has been properly noticed at the time of receipt of application at the Neighbors and Planning Committee. Tonight, we have we have posted signs in the neighborhood. We've sent written notification out. I've gone to the Cherry Creek Steering Committee and answered their technical questions about this. We have received no written public comments on this rezoning. Just one slide on the review criteria, which is in summary, we reviewed it the same way review. We reviewed the rezoning in October for all of Cherry Creek North. And so we based our analysis on that analysis where we found it consistent with the adopted plans and this clarification, we're just rezoning those vacated rights away to the same zoned districts that about them. The justifying circumstance in this case is the correction of an error in the official zoning map. Otherwise, our analysis is identical to the analysis we provided and in October, in which there has done a good job detailing in the written staff report. So having reviewed it against the criteria we recommend approval of. Wonderful. All right. We have no we have no speakers. And so directly to questions. Councilman Neville. Yeah, just a point of order, Mr. President. This is not located in District one, so I don't know if we're we can actually consider this tonight because this. District one show. What are you talking about? I guess we can make an exception. All right. Any. Oh. They're lining them. All right. Councilman Lopez. I have a comment. Okay, so any other questions? You know the question on 1076. Seen on public hearing now closed. Time for comments. We'll start with council woman. Rob. Please vote for this. Thank you. Councilman lopez. For this man. Yes. All right. Great presentation. Any other any other comments on that? Councilwoman Shepherd. Thank you to all of my colleagues for listening to so much passionate testimony tonight regarding so many projects in District one. I appreciate your indulgence. Any other comments? 1076. Seen none, Madam Secretary. Roll call. Rob Shepherd. Sussman. Brooks Brown. Hi, Fats. I can eat lemon. Lopez, Montero. Nevitt. Hi, Ortega. Hi, Mr. President. I. Yeah. Kathleen Brooks. Come in, Brown. You voted. You didn't need just you to punch that, if you could, please. All right, Madam Secretary, please cast a vote in. Now the results. Lebanese. Lebanese 1036 have been placed on final consideration and does pass. On Tuesday, February 17th, 2015, Council will hold a required public hearing on Council Bill 1094, changing the 11 classification for BLOCK One, the South Lake subdivision. Finally one located in southeast corner of 17th Avenue and Stewart Street, a required public hearing on Council Bill 1095, changing the zoning classification for 1673 South Emerson Street. And on Monday, March 2nd, Council hold a quiet public hearing on Council Bill 1096 Change in Zoning Classification 7200 East 36th Avenue. Any protest against Council Bill 1094 1095 must be filed with the Council offices no later than noon on Monday, February nine, 2015. And any protest against Council Bill 1096 must be filed with the Council Offices no later than noon on Monday, February 23rd, 2015. Seeing no other business before this body, this meeting is adjourned. Denver eight TV. Your city. Your source. Denver. Eight on TV and online. Stay connected to your community, your city, your source. You are watching Denver eight TV. Your city. Your source.