A bill for an ordinance relating to the Denver Zoning Code to establish the Urban Edge Singe Unit B1 zone district. Approves text amendment #7 to the Denver Zoning Code to establish the new E-SU-B1 zone district and other associated amendments in Articles 2, 4, 10, and 13. The Committee approved filing this item at its meeting on 9-29-20.
12 Eyes Council Bill 966 has passed. Councilmember Black, will you please put council bill? 1027 on the floor for final passage. Yes, Madam President, I move that council bill 20 dash 1027 be placed upon final consideration and do pass. Thank you. It's been moved and seconded. You've got either Herndon or Hines. Herndon. Thank you. Councilman Herndon, the combined public hearing for Council Bill 1027 and Council Bill 1028 is open. Speakers may offer comments on either, either or both items after the conclusion of the public hearing. Council will vote separately on each. May we please have the staff report and we have Liz Weigel up. It evening. Thank you, Madam President. And Council members. Can you see my presentation carefully? This presentation will cover both the Text Amendment and Map Amendment, both of which are sponsored by Councilwoman Amanda Sandoval in order to allow accessory dwelling units or to use in the Chaffee Park neighborhood. The tax amendment creates a new zone district, the ESU B1 district, which would allow accessory dwelling units on single unit residential lots with a minimum lot size of 2500 square feet. The map amendment reasons all single unit residential districts in Chevy Park to allow accessory dwelling units. While I'm presenting the two amendments to concurrently text amendment must be considered for approval first. This will allow consideration of the MAP amendment pending the establishment of a new zone district. The proposed rezoning is located within Council District one in the Chaffee Park neighborhood. It includes the area in Chevy Park that has residential zoning. This includes approximately 1400 parcels bounded by Federal Boulevard, Osage Street, 52nd Avenue and Interstate 70. The proposed Map amendment intends to rezone properties between federal and town that are currently ESU dx2 ESU d1x properties b between Tyrone and Paco Street that are currently ESU B to the proposed ESU b one zone district properties between Pecos and Osage that are currently ESU d t s d once the proposed zone, districts are the same as the current zoning districts, except that they would allow accessory dwelling unit use either within the primary structure or in a detached structure. Similarly, the new ESU b one district would retain the same standards of the ESU district, but would allow it to use. I'll go over the existing context. The proposed rezoning area is currently if you be if you Denise had access I mentioned all three zone districts are single unit residential districts and they allow the Urban House primary building form with a maximum height of 30 to 35 feet. The district also allows the suburban house primary building form. There is a view plane in this portion of this area that starts at the park at 4/51 Street and extends towards downtown. This results in building height limits, ranging from approximately 34 square feet at the south end of the park to approximately 75, 79 feet towards Interstate 70. This range of heights generally exceeds the allowable maximum height for both the current and proposed zone districts and does not. Impact the rezoning. In terms of existing land use. The area is predominantly single unit residential land use that you can see in yellow. On this map. There are a few public and quite public uses throughout and the proposed rezoning is adjacent to a commercial office mixed use, parking, open space and some industrial uses. Here are some images from within the. Proposed. Rezoning, with examples from each of the three zoned districts. And here are some images from surrounding areas. The Council office worked closely with the Chevy Park Neighborhood Association and began outreach for this rezoning last fall. This outreach included fliers canvasing two town halls and an online survey. We also took the text amendment to the agency's Zoning and Planning Committee in July of this year. The application was formally submitted in May of 2020, and on September 16th, the Planning Board voted unanimously to recommend approval. 12 speakers at that hearing, ten in support and two in opposition. CPD has received a letter of support from the Chevy Park Neighborhood Association. We've also received 26 comments in support from members of the public, citing a desire and appropriateness for its use in this neighborhood and the importance of use as a tool to promote affordability and aging in place opportunities. We've also received six comments in opposition, citing concerns around parking density, neighborhood character and short term rental. Because this rezoning is legislative, you know, it is only subject to three review criteria shown here. Text amendment is subject to these same criteria, so I will discuss them together. But the first is consistency with adopted plans. So we do find that the press text and map amendments are consistent with several strategies from current Plan 2040 shown here, and there are a few that I'll call out specifically. The amendments are consistent with the to these two equity strategies because the text amendment creates a new zone districts that will allow any use and the map amendment enables it to use in the entire neighborhoods. Use can provide additional housing options, including those for seniors and families, and they can provide residents more flexibility to remain in their homes. The amendments are consistent with our climate strategy because they will allow additional housing units on lots with existing houses where we have existing infrastructure and services such as sewer, water and transit in place. In Blueprint ever the theories called out as an urban edge context. The proposed zone districts are consistent with this plan direction, which would remain predominantly residential. With. A single and two unit uses. The proposed. Zone. District are consistent with the future places mapping, which is called out as low residential and described as single and two unit and places where accessory dwelling units are appropriate. There are some residential collectors and arterials in the area, but most of the. Streets. In the rezoning are on designated locals. Under. The Blue Point growth strategy. These areas are expected to see 10% of job growth and 20% of housing growth by 2040. The additional accessory dwelling units permitted. By the. Rezoning would be consistent with that growth strategy. The amendments are also consistent with additional strategies and blueprint. These are detailed in the staff report, but I'll briefly summarize them here. A policy for of our land. Usain Bolt form section states that we should diversify housing choice by through the expansion of accessory dwelling units throughout all our residential areas in the city. Policy 11 recommends that we implement Blueprint's plan recommendations through large scale legislative legislative rezoning, which should include community input and be guided by our equity concepts. Now Policy five focuses on the importance of mitigating involuntary displacement, which I'll discuss in the next few slides. So similar to the reasoning you just heard text amendments and a large map amendment should be guided by our equity concepts and blueprint over the first of which I'll go over access to opportunity. This is a composite score that includes our Neighborhood Equity Index, also proximity to high capacity, frequent transit and access to centers and corridors. The Chevy Park neighborhood has moderate scores in this category, with access to rail transit lower and access to centers and corridors marrying throughout the neighborhoods. The text amendments create ECB. One will create a new zone district within our urban edge context to allow to use, which would allow more residents to live in neighborhoods with access to amenities and quality of life infrastructure. The proposed rezoning in Chaffee Park will bring more residents to an area that has access to health care, high life expectancy, and it does have access to bus transit and corridors and centers in some portions of the neighborhood. The proposed rezoning will not have a direct impact on creating new corridors or centers, as it will only allow residential uses. The second equity concept is vulnerability to involuntary displacement, and this is a score that includes median household income, percent of renter occupied units, and the percent of residents with less than a college degree. Chaffee Park is more vulnerable based on median household income and education levels, as shown in bold on the slide. It does have high homeownership. The text amendment will allow more properties in the urban edge context neighborhoods to establish an 82 on their property, which can be an important opportunity to build wealth and help keep current residents in place. It also provides more options for households for. Vulnerable. To displacement to stay in the neighborhoods. The proposed map will similarly provide opportunities for existing homeowners to supplement their income, while also increasing housing options and allowing a greater range of incomes to live in the neighborhoods. The third equity concept is housing diversity, and this includes five measures, including the percent of middle density housing, home size, diversity of bedroom size, ownership versus rental housing costs and the number of income restricted units. Chevy Park is considered not diverse for the three measurements shown in bold. The text amount amendment will expand housing diversity by allowing a new housing option that is typically smaller and a different price point than existing single unit homes, often found in urban edge neighborhoods. The map amendment to allow it to use will introduce a new housing type to Chaffee Park and bring more renters to a largely owner occupied single unit residential neighborhood. The last equity concept is jobs diversity. This map shows the mix of jobs and areas of the city with the dominant industry depicted by color. Chevy Park shows a greater proportion of retail and manufacturing jobs compared to the city overall. The text amount map amendments will have a negligible impact on jobs for the city because their residential district. And I will also cover housing inclusive difference. This plan was adopted in 2018 and contains recommendations that are relevant to the Text and Map amendment. The plan recommends expanding the development of accessory dwelling units as they incentivize affordable and mixed use housing. It also promotes their development as a wealth building tool. For low and moderate. Income homeowners. The proposed text and Map amendment expand access to A2 use and are therefore consistent with these recommendations. In terms of the additional criteria, we define that the amendments will result in uniform regulations applicable to all new development within the urban edge zone districts. The proposed Text Amendment and Map Amendment will further public health, safety and general welfare by implementing Blueprint Denver. For. Excuse me, the proposed rezoning. We'll also improve public health outcomes by allowing more residents in an area that has higher life expectancy and access to health care, plus. Transit. Centers and corridors. It will also further the general welfare of the city by providing more housing, diversity and opportunities to help residents at a range of income levels continue to live in the neighborhoods. Given the finding that all review criteria have been met, staff does recommend approval of both the TEX Amendment and the MAP amendment. Thank you. All right. Thank you, Liz, for the staff report. Council has not received any written testimony on Council Bill 1027 NOR Council Bill 1028. And we have seven individuals signed up to speak this evening. And we will start out with Jason Warnock. Hi there. Sorry about that. Good evening. My name is Jason Hornick, and I live at 50th and Decatur Street. I'm on the board of the Chevy Park Neighborhood Association, and I'm the leader of our ADU Task Force. So I'm delighted by the opportunity to speak in support of both items on this historic bill. This vote is the culmination of a two year effort that began when multiple residents approached the R.A. asking how they could build an ADU on their property. After consulting with CPD and examining the comprehensive plan, we realized that the best path forward would be to pursue a mass legislative rezoning with the help of our city council office . With their leadership, we performed extensive outreach in the neighborhood, and I'm very proud that we were able to show that a majority of our residents are in favor of this gentle increase in density. The physical character of Chaffee Park hasn't changed that much since it was built in the 1940s. But the situation around it has changed quite a bit. This neighborhood was on the edge of town. It was built, but it's now just two neighborhoods away from the downtown of a major American city with miles of sprawl on the other side. Even though Chaffee, the park's built environment, remained stable, despite all this external change, our land values have skyrocketed, which has caused economic and social instability for our residents. Under our current zoning code, our residents only have two options to deal with this instability. Stay and try to keep up with their rising property taxes or they can cash in and sell their property and move away. We're trying to give people a third option, one, where they can capitalize on the increasing land value without having to move out. An option that could allow them to alleviate the pressures of increasing housing costs and provide care for their extended family without sacrificing their independence. An option that won't benefit them. It won't just benefit them as the. Owner of the property, but will benefit the person that rents it as well by providing them a reasonably priced home. This option allows us, the residents of Chaffee Park, to do something this city has been struggling with for years, providing more housing. Legalizing 80 years will give us that option. So I won't directly benefit from this bill as I won't be building an ad on my property. But I strongly believe that my neighbors should have the right to do so if they choose. Because I realize that this is bigger than me as an individual and it's bigger than us as a neighborhood. It's about the city and our land use values as a whole. We're growing so fast that attempting to live the same way we did in the past is actively harming our future. So our comprehensive plan clearly recommends that 80 years should be allowed by right everywhere in the city. I'm extremely proud of the work we did to get here tonight, and I'm very thankful for our council, women's leadership and courage. And I'm hopeful this process provides enough proof of concept that it should be legalized across the whole city without having to duplicate this effort neighborhood by neighborhood. So we can instead use that time to figure out ways to make them more affordable for the people that need them the most. And that will be our next effort. So if you vote yes, of course. Thank you very much for your time. Have a good night. Thank you. Our next speaker is Frederick Glick. Hi. Good evening. My name is Fred Glick. I reside at 3850 North York Street in the Clayton Neighborhood Council District number nine. I'm also a property owner in the Chaffee Park neighborhood. I'm here tonight to urge you to support this combined text amendment and map amendment to allow to use throughout the Chaffee Park neighborhood. The application before you tonight represents the outcome of an admirable and amazing public process in the R.A. and Councilwoman Sandoval and her staff deserve great respect and gratitude for their efforts. There are a lot of good reasons to allow aid use throughout the Chaffee Park neighborhood, providing opportunities for residents to age in place, helping homeowners to build their equity in their homes, enabling multi-generational and extended families to live together. The residents of Chaffee Park have also made clear that they would like the benefits of increased density, including opportunities for neighborhood retail, which would be made much more viable with increased density. When I participated. In one of the public. Sessions organized by Councilwoman Sandoval's office in the Arno, I heard people express fears that they wouldn't know who is living in their backyards. As the owner of an aide to you. I'd like to make sure it's clear if you choose to have an aide to you. You also get to choose what you do with it. Rent it out. How does a family member use it as a. Home office. Store? Old newspapers in it. We rent our Adu and we used. A web platform to take applications and conduct background checks on. Prospective tenants. We interviewed them called references. We chose who to rent our you to. In approving this application. You begin to fulfill the Denver Rite Mandate to allow. To use throughout the city the one off rezoning to allow you to use on individual properties the city is seeing more and more of are a barrier to those hoping to have a to use. Not everyone can readily afford the fees required and navigating the city rezoning process. Isn't necessarily easy. These one off. Rezonings also consume considerable city resources, which I cannot believe the city comes close to recouping through the fees charged. In many respects, the application before you tonight is about equity and opportunity. Many residents, including in my own neighborhood of Clayton, see the borders between where 80 use are allowed and where they are not as arbitrary. Many of my neighbors who are on the wrong side of the line would like the opportunity to have an ADU to house an aging parent, to generate additional income to do their part to help alleviate the housing supply crisis Denver faces. I hope you will not only approve this application, but also look at it as a model of what should come next, whether citywide or neighborhood by neighborhood. The ability for residents to have air to use should not be reliant upon whether they can risk the fees required. Whether they come to feel. Comfortable navigating the rezoning process. I thank you for your time and consideration. Thank you. Our next speaker is Nola Miguel. Good evening, councilmembers. Nolan Miguel, 4930 Vallejo Street. I also live in Chevy Park and I'm part of the R.A. and I'm actually interested in this reason, both for personal reasons and for systemic reasons that I think are important for the whole city. I would like to build a Grammy flat and I say Grammy because that's what my kids call my mom. And I would like her to be able to move in my backyard, ideally or any place close to us. And we have been looking around the neighborhood walkable distance from our house. Where my kids to walk over to. And there's nothing in the neighborhood that's affordable under $400,000. We've been looking at ARIA, at the condos there, looking for housing there. We're looking over $400,000 for all of those options. She retired. About two years ago. From. The University of Wisconsin and would like move here because. All. Of us and especially her grandchildren. And we need a different a different type of option. We're also, you know, we have a pretty big lot. It's 10,000 feet. I'm very interested in the idea of activating our alleyway. It's a huge amount of space that it's unused and activated. Throughout the neighborhood. I also think that we have plenty of parking. I just just say that throughout the neighborhood and in our front and back yard, there's parking. Systemically, I think of as many have said so far, we really need affordable housing and rental options outside of just building large, large apartments. And this is a great infill option. Also very thankful to Councilwoman Sandoval and her office in figuring out a solution for the east part of the neighborhood. I'm really thankful that we could do this as a comprehensive neighborhood and appreciate all your work on this. Also, just 80, you should be across the city. It's the reason we've been looking at it in D.C. for a long time as well. But our little there's so many pressures in D.C. with with investments happening right now. That putting another thing in there just didn't seem like quite the right time. And we really would like to see this be across the whole city instead of being neighborhood by neighborhood. Also, those support services for low income homeowners is critical. Critical. We could I've looked into how much I could get for a loan, how much we could if we could figure this out. And we couldn't do this without the investment from my. Mom. To be able to build this. So I think it's critical to have investment strategies to do some of the West Denver Renaissance programing. Also, just to use, if possible, to have a structure that could be a one story garage and unit on the same level. That's really the most affordable. Thing to build. Thanks very much. Thank you. Our next speaker is Lucia Brown. Hello. My name is Lucia Brown and I live in the Baker neighborhood in Council District seven with John. And I'm also president of the Baker Historic Neighborhood Association. And. We've had 80 youths in Baker forever. We had carriage houses built and so even before 80 were allowed in the zoning, we had them here because of grandfathering. I have a carriage house in my backyard and we converted. It was my husband's office for 16 years and we just converted it over to an apartment. And not only does it provide more necessary housing in Denver, it's an extra source of income. And so I'll when my husband retires, we'll still have some income coming in to the house. And I know that there are people who are concerned about like short term rentals and issues like that. But because Denver has such strong short term rental laws with the property having to be the primary residence, there really would be very little negative impact. And also the area of Chaffee County, I don't think would be a high demand area for short term rentals. It's not like it's close to downtown or close to a lot of amenities. So it would probably be more profitable for the home owners to lease long term. So I just want to be on the record as saying that I fully support this text of amendment change and I agree with NOLA that this should be done citywide and not neighborhood by neighborhood. It's a no brainer way to do gentle increase in density and allow for different kinds of housing options and allowing people to age in place. It also deals with being green, you know, more dense. It lowers your carbon footprint. So that's where I stand. And I appreciate the council allowing us to speak on this issue. All right. And hi. Everybody. Hello. Thank you. Next up, we have Susan Powers. Good evening, everyone. First of all, I wanted to thank Councilwoman Sandoval for bringing this forward. This is and actually also thank the Chaffee Park Neighborhood Association, because I think they're the most thoughtful, I know in the city. And how often do you have the R.A. coming here saying, yes, we have. We we approve this, we we recommend this. So I'm I'm I'm speaking as a property owner as part of the RDA Denver development within Chaffee Park. But I guess those percent 11 1475 Dale Gagne, which is District nine, the area Denver development, which is the 17 acre redevelopment of the former Mary Kress Convent, is immediately adjacent to this area. It's it's part of the city and in Chaffee Park is not part of this rezoning because it's being built out in in in ways where we have adus already there. And I am going to say, too, and if she's still listening to this, that we do have an affordable co-housing unit available. So I, I think I have to make sure that I let that person who was speaking earlier know that she maybe her mom can move in there. But I'm here to support this. We've been we've been involved with with this neighborhood for over 15 years, with the Mary Kris property. And we have intentionally developed it as a as a mixed income project will end up with for 40% of the units as as affordable as it's developed and finished up in the next two years. But I think that having the 82 option here is, as everybody has said, is gives people who are long term homeowners in the Chaffee Park neighborhood who are you know, it's the neighborhood that is being impacted by the growth that's coming from the south, the ability to stay in their homes, build a unit that might provide them with the income that is necessary for them to carry to carry on their normal life. In this in this neighborhood. We've I've watched this for the last however many years as as things have jumped across I-70 and have been concerned about whether the character of that neighborhood was going to change, to continue to change. And and I think this is a way to kind of counter some of that gentrification. So I hope that your support this tonight. Thank you. Thank you. Our next speaker is Alison O'Kelly. Thank you. Can you hear me? All right? Go ahead. Perfect. Thank you. So, my name is Allison O'Kelly. I live in the 4800 block of Decatur Street in the neighborhood as well. I bought my home a little over seven years ago right before a property values started skyrocketing. So I was I was lucky to be able to afford a house at the time. And I'm lucky now to have realized some of those equity increases that Jason spoke about earlier this evening. I speak today in support of the neighborhood rezoning of the neighborhood. I do want to make sure I disclose that I do work in affordable housing. So I would support this gentle density increase in any neighborhood in Denver. But I do in particular as a resident of JP Park. I think that creating this neighborhood zoning allowance makes it possible for us to do so without creating the administrative burden that has already been discussed but is put upon the Planning and Zoning Commission, as well as any residents who would like to build an ADU. And so I think the fact that we're doing this is a neighborhood wide proposal has been a really smart thing. And I also agree with recommendations that this become a city wide approval rather than additional neighborhoods needing to go through the process that we did. I think that the height and setback limits on buildings that were discussed in the presentation earlier will ensure that there aren't any abuse that would cause negative impacts on the adjacent homes like I know a number of neighborhoods have been concerned about before ideas came in and they saw what the limits were on those. I also think that we can ensure community access in safety to the neighborhood because as NOLA said earlier, we have fairly wide streets and a lot of space for parking. Most of the houses in our neighborhood have parking both in the front and in the back. So access to those units is not going to create additional traffic and it's not going to create. A lot of mobility. Of the residents. I think that not everybody in the neighborhood will be in a financial position to start building 80 years if this is approved. I myself wouldn't build one anytime soon, but I think it's really important the opportunity that's going to provide to increase affordable housing in the neighborhood and homeownership stability. I think those of us who have elderly relatives in the neighborhood or in the broader metro area see this is a great opportunity to discuss with those family members the possibility of senior family members downsizing and being able to combine homes in a way that works for the entire family. And while I don't see myself doing that soon, my family, my parents live in North Glen and they're very vital seniors now. But things can always change. And I like the fact that we can look at this together as a potential opportunity down the road. So I do want to thank our council member and Naomi Grant as well. And I thank all of you for your time and hope you will support this. Thank you. Thank you. Our last speaker is Jesse Paris. It's getting in the middle of the council watching at on her. So Black star maximum for self defense. It makes it harder for social change as well as the Unity Party of Colorado email lines. And I live in district eight and Christopher Hamm is district and I will be the next member in 2023. I support this rezoning tonight and are one of the many hopes as our push for the green for city council our laws last year. And I am very familiar with this district because I've marked this area. Two years in a row for candidates that ran for office, most recently in the state Senate. So on the safety part area. So I'm a councilwoman and I support this rezoning. I believe that this should pass tonight. I just got a few questions. I want to know that some of the comments or lack of the opposition at the planning meeting and what were the six? Not as an op ed or comments at the at the hearing that the company had in regards to these animals. I support it. I would like to see them in every district in this town, as Laura and others have already stated. So if someone can please answer my questions, I will greatly appreciate it. Thank you. All right. Thank you, Jesse. That concludes our speakers questions from members of Council on Council Bill 1027 and or Council Bill 1028. Give it another moment for any hands raised. All right. See? No questions of members of council. The public hearing is closed. Comments by members of Council on Council Bill 1027 and or Council Bill 1028. Councilwoman Sandoval. Thank you, Madam President. So thank you all. It's an honor to be here before you today with this application. As it's been discussed, this is the first time an entire neighborhood has been zoned to allow accessory dwelling units. And honestly, I wouldn't be here today with all of you if it wasn't for the residents of Chevy Park. They came together and approached me before I was even sworn into office to talk about how we could get this done. And one of the things that we found out early on is that you're voting on two things. You're creating a new map and then you're creating a new zone district, because on the east side of town, the parcels are so small that there was not actually a zone district that would allow accessory dwelling units. So I had to create I had to slow the process down a little bit and work with community planning and development and create equity throughout the whole entire neighborhood. So the whole entire neighborhood would be able to allow it, have the opportunity to have accessory dwelling units. I would also like to think my aid council I'm sorry, my aide, Naomi Grundy's, who graduated with her master's in land use planning and she and I came up with an idea and how to get involvement from the neighborhood. She worked on a survey that was really well received and did a lot of the back work, which I call talking to neighbors and explaining this in a way where it's digestible. I feel like a lot of times when we're talking about rezoning and we're talking about land use, we use terminology that's not very accessible. And those in the city and county of Denver or those of us on city council, we understand it because we have lots of meetings with planners who explain it. And so I feel like it's my job to be able to explain it to everybody who would be impacted by these rezonings. So thank you, Naomi, for your steadfast leadership on this. And I would also like to talk to Jesse's concern. So some of the people who were opposed to this were nervous about having strangers in their backyard. They were nervous about parking and they were nervous about change in northwest Denver. I was born and raised. There has been a lot of change. The built environment has changed drastically since the 2010 zoning code, and so a lot of change. Change can be challenging and it can be a lot of fear based. And so we listened to everybody, and I made the tough decision to move forward on the application based on a lot of the equity concepts that you would have found in the document that Liz presented. And we also met with the city assessors to make sure we talked about taxes. We met with the fire department to talk about Allie with we met with Rene Martinez Stone, who runs the West Denver Collaborative, Renaissance Collaborative, who works on building 80 years in West Denver to figure out how we could work all together in TAPI Park. I had this survey in English and Spanish. We had our fliers done in English and Spanish, and so we had two responses in Spanish. So that shows me that it's working as long as they can have access to the information. And with that, if anyone if my colleagues have anything, any other comments, I would absolutely, really appreciate your support. This is a big deal for those who have housing over there. And I'll give a personal example. I have a cousin who has Down syndrome who lives in this neighborhood, and I would like his caretaker to be able to live there. We are making succession plans for him. He's one of my dear cousins. He's exactly my age in 40 and been working at McDonald's. And I would like Ben and all my other relatives who live in Chevy Park to stay in this neighborhood. So with that, I would ask that you support this initiative to help create some gentle density in Chevy Park, and I feel like it meets all the criteria. Thank you. Thank you, Councilman Sandoval. And seeing other hands raised for comments, I'll comment. I would hope that all of our colleagues do support both 1027 and 1028. And just want to give you a huge congrats, Councilwoman Sandoval, because this was a heavy lift and your leadership and your community engagement and to have seven speakers here to all basically be in support of it goes a long way towards your community outreach and engagement. And so I just want to sincerely congratulate congratulate you and the Chaffee Park neighborhood, too, that they're going to have this additional tool for general dental density in the neighborhood. And with that being said, Madam Secretary, roll call on Council Bill 1027, please. Sandoval, I. Where I. Torres, I. Black. I. See the buckets, I. Clark. I. When? I turned in. I. I. Cashman. I. Can I? Ortega. I. Madam President. I. Madam Secretary, close the voting and announce the results. 1313 Ies Council Bill 1027 has passed. Counsel Woman Black, would you please put Council Bill 1028 on the floor?