Adoption of Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Consent to the Six-Month Extension of the Landing Rights Agreement to Land at Harbor Bay Ferry Terminal By and Between San Francisco Bay Area Water Emergency Transportation Authority and Tideline Marine Group.  (Community Development 227)
Is is my hope so with that motion second all in favor I opposed abstain. The motion passes unanimously. Thank you. Okay. The next item that was pulled from the consent calendar. Councilmember o.t, you wanted item five j pulled. Yes. Thank you, Madam Mayor. I'm going to support this, but I just wanted to do it with a caveat of my own. What concerns me here is that we have public facilities that were built with public funds, and it takes a long time for some of these routes to build up and gain a fare back stability. And my concern is that you have private operators come in at lower cost. And my concern is that they don't end up uber rising, for lack of a better term leader, and we end up losing Rita. So I'd like to make sure that when this comes back, next time there's some type of car neutrality agreement or something that that protects the workers that work at these at these organizations. So I am prepared to support it. But next time, if there's not anything like that in there, I would be opposed to approving any more extensions and threat to our public facilities. And just for clarification, I would add that it was noted that the we, the board of directors approved unanimously was afforded nothing, that somebody was absent. This extension agreement encouraged sideline. That's the operator of this small boat. It's almost like a water taxi and the Inland Boatman's Union of the Pacific to come to an agreement during that period of time. And timeline has agreed to this extension and is in ongoing negotiations with IAP and the IAP representative at the WE. The Board meeting described these negotiations as cordial and positive in tone, so I would be looking for good results to come forward to. Hope so, yeah. And of course, what we are trying to do this is. To accommodate a new life science company down at Harvard Bay Business Park that moved to Alameda from south San Francisco and still has a lot of its employees living in south San Francisco. So rather than have them get on the freeway in their cars and, you know, contribute to greenhouse gas emissions and all those good things, they arrange this private service and but with the approval of Rita and yes, I think it's there's a good template and I'm hopeful that they're moving forward. So any other comments you do? I have a motion, Councilmember Vela. I do want to clear I do want to make sure that, you know, one of the issues that had come up before is that our staff, I think, had weighed in on this issue before we did before we had actually taken a vote. So I just want to make sure that while I appreciate the inclusion and I think that it needs to be there, that that leaders process is informed by our council direction and that we don't we aren't sending staff to try to inform that ahead of whatever gets decided. Thank you. I do have a motion here for the comments. So moved. Second. Okay. We have a motion from the vice mayor, seconded by Councilmember Vela. All in favor. I opposed abstain. The motion carries unanimously. And then we have one more item. I think it was just one more that was pulled in.