A bill for an ordinance changing the zoning classification for 1010 West Colfax Avenue, 1050 West Colfax Avenue & 1443 Kalamath Street in Lincoln Park. Approves a map amendment to rezone properties from B-4 with waivers, UO-1, UO-2 to C-MX-5 and C-MX-8 (former chapter 59 zoning to mixed-use) with waivers, located at 1010 and 1050 West Colfax Avenue and 1443 Kalamath Street in Council District 3. The Committee approved filing this item at its meeting on 10-13-20.
Council Member Sandoval Will you please put Council Bill 1086 on the floor for final passage? I move that bill 20 dash 1086 be placed upon final consideration and do pass. Thank you. It's been moved. Thank you for the second. Councilwoman Ortega. The required public hearing for council bill 20 Dash 1086 is open. May we have the staff report? Certainly, Madam President. Good evening, counsel. I'm Brandon. Shaver. 1/2. Look, get this in presentation. I'm Brandon Schaefer, senior city planner with CPD presenting a special math amendment for ten, ten and 1050 West Colfax and 1443 Kalamazoo St. Three Zoning from before with waivers. You are one year or two to see Annex five and CM eight with waivers. You can see that the subject property is located at the southeast corner of West Colfax Avenue and North Commerce Street in Council District three within the Lincoln Park neighborhood. The subject property is currently a drive thru restaurant. Strip mall and. Commercial building, measuring approximately. 1.89. Acres in land area and is requesting a rezoning to CM x five at the southern portion of the property along Kalama Street and CMCs eight, with waivers along Colfax Avenue to allow mixed use development. Current zoning on the site as before with waivers. You one, you two. That is the adult use and billboard use overlay the zoning dates back to 1978. It is a former Chapter 59 zone district meant to provide neighborhood serving users along arterial streets where a maximum floor area ratio of 2 to 1 can be achieved. There's a complete list of the waivers in the staff report, but I just want to make mention of two that prohibit the adult and billboard use overlays, thereby canceling out the overlays that are currently mapped on the property. Adjacent zoning includes campus to the north, rear campus. C, Mass five. C, max five and GMC 12, all with the adult billboard use overlays with GM's three and two unit zoning to the. Existing land use of the subject property is commercial retail adjacent land uses include public quasi public college campus office mixed use unit residential and vacant land across Lebanon Street. Here are some photos to give you a sense of the building form and on the area with the subject property on the top left, in the top right. You can also see residential structures on the south of the site, on the bottom left, and then the vacant land along West Colfax Avenue as pictured on the bottom right . Here is a side by side compared compared to the table showing the differences between the proposed and existing zone districts, the CM CMC's five and CMC's eight with waivers were introduced build to back and transparency requirements that will result in a more urban, pedestrian friendly built form that is more appropriate for this location. There are also waivers proposed for the portion of the site along Colfax that's rezoning to CMCs eight. These waivers are detailed in the staff report in the application, and they limit the building height to seven storeys and 75 feet. These waivers will not impact the protected district standards imposed by the two unit zoning to the south. These waivers are intended to provide flexibility in accommodating an additional four affordable housing units in close proximity to transit. And they are consistent with CPD's policy of using waivers as a bridge to a future text amendment. As many of you may be aware. CPD is currently working on an affordable housing zoning incentive. And this site is probably going to have would probably qualify as being considered as an incentive area. There's also a development agreement in the form of an affordable housing agreement that has been executed. This agreement goes beyond the build alternative plan as 10% of all units will be income restricted for a period of 99 years at 60 and 80% and my levels, 25% of these income restricted units will be two bedrooms and 10% will be three bedrooms. Further income restricted units will be equitably distributed across the project and constructed of similar quality as the market rate units. As as the project is currently designed, there will be a total of 28 affordable housing units provided. This is in contrast to the four affordable housing units. That would be the results of the build alternative plan calculation. Information on the rest of this application was sent in late November. At that time, the applicant. Continued to. Engage with the community. They worked with hosts to develop that affordable housing agreement, and they worked with CPD to craft the waiver language. This resulted in a revised application being submitted in late August. At the time, the staff report was sent out. We have received 18 letters of support, including one from the VA on the Lincoln Park neighborhood and one letter of concern and one letter in opposition. Moving to the criteria. There are four plans that impact the subject property beginning with comprehensive plan 2040. This proposed rezoning is consistent with many of the strategies dealing with equitable, affordable and inclusive, strong and authentic neighborhoods and environmentally resilient goals and strategies. Moving the blueprint. DENVER The subject property is mapped as part of the general urban neighborhood context. The predominant land use in these areas is multi-unit residential and there is a regular street grid with consistent alley access. However, this application is proposing the urban center neighborhood context, which is more appropriate as the site is across the street from light rail station in close proximity to downtown Denver and nearer to campus. As Blueprint Denver master at a citywide scale. Limited flexibility can be interpreted as long as the request furthers planned goals and fits with the overall intent of the context map, which this does. And is consistent. The future place map designates this property as a community corridor. Here we envision a mix of office, commercial and residential uses with buildings generally up to eight storeys in height and given the street type of Colfax Avenue being a downtown arterial. The increased height here does make sense, and it is still less given the waivers that will limit the property to seven storeys instead of eight. So provide that transition to the neighborhood, to the south. This is part of the community centers and corridors growth area strategy where we envision 25% of new housing and 20% of new employment by 2040. Next, we have the Lincoln Park neighborhood plan. This plan was adopted in 2010 and envisions the area as a stable, mixed income neighborhood that provides connections to the surrounding neighborhoods downtown and the area of campus. The Framework Plan identifies the subject property as both mixed use retail and mixed use commercial, and the application of mixed use zoning as prescribed in these places and also in areas of change which these properties were designated as in Blueprint Number 22. The Building Heights Annapolis plan recommends up to five stories along Colfax and up to two stories along with along Kalama Street, closer to 14th Avenue. However, the plan does anticipate higher intensity zoning changes, and in these instances, applicants must substantially mitigate negative impacts. And approve the plan goals. So in working with the community, the applicant has been able to. Provide an affordable housing agreement and increase the amount of retail based on the neighborhood inputs. They have also relocated truck access. Based on neighborhood alley concerns. And they've also planted their plan to do live working. That's what they plan streets to better integrate with the residential area. And lastly, they are intending a public art component to be along Kalama Street to better integrate into the art district on Santa Fe. Well, it's not a supplemental plan to comp plan. This rezoning does mean housing and inclusive Denver and it will be providing affordable housing in areas of opportunity and promoting mixed income retail housing. Staff also finds that this reasoning meets the next two criteria as a result of the uniformity of district regulations and also further public health, safety and welfare through implementing adopted plans, facilitating increased housing density in transit, and providing better health outcomes through increased physical activity within walkable distances. There are two justifying circumstances mentioned for this reasoning. The first is change or changing conditions in the surrounding area. Recent physical changes include the opening of new multi-unit residential projects within close proximity to the site, as well as significant public and private investments along the Santa Fe Corridor. And the second justified circumstance points to the fact that the subject property currently zoned before with waivers you are one you have to retain. Former Chapter 59 after the city adopted the Denver zoning code. Lastly, the proposed rezoning is consistent with the urban center neighborhood context that exists in the surrounding area and with the purpose and intent statements for both Cemex five and CMC's eight. City staff recommends approval based on all review criteria met. I'm happy to answer questions. And also we have Andrew from hosts. Who can. Answer the questions about the voluntary housing agreement. Thank you. All right. Thank you very much, Brandon. There has been no written testimony submitted regarding Council Bill 1086, and we have four individuals signed up to speak this evening, and our first speaker is Joe Swanson. All right. I thought we had Joe. All right, Joe, we're getting you promoted up into the panelist. And you might have to meet yourself, Joe. There you go. This is Joe Swenson. And everybody hear me? Okay. Go ahead. Great. My name is Joe Swenson. My address is 950 17th Street in Denver, Colorado. I'm a senior manager of real estate development at the Opus Group based here in Denver. And I like to thank you and city staff for your work on this project. We appreciate the opportunity to present to you and look forward to this evening's discussion. You're with us tonight. We have several of our team members. I'll be joined in this presentation by Brian Connolly from Don Johnson. And all of us are available to answer your questions. The oldest group is a 65 year old company based in Minneapolis, has had a presence in the Denver community for over 25 years. We have a strong community focus and commitment to Denver, not only donate millions of dollars per year to community organizations, but also volunteer our time to partner for a greater impact. Our company's focus on community has driven our work on this project, and because of that, we began our engagement efforts over 15 months ago. From the beginning, it was important for us to get early input and feedback and the community's vision for this property. We held six meetings with the registered neighborhood organization before even submitting our zoning application and then a number of individual conversations with our members throughout this process. In addition, we held meetings with the Neighborhood Equity and Stabilization Group hosts Denver Housing Authority, the District of Santa Fe and the Santa Fe Business District. Affordable housing is a very important component of the proposed rezoning request. A project team worked with House to negotiate an affordable housing agreement that runs the land for 99 year period. The affordable component of the rezoning will allow for 60% and 80%, and my units will have a wide variety of unit types and sizes. We've also dedicated all of our three bedroom units to be affordable. The proposed zoning will create conditions that can benefit the community in a variety of ways. Early on, the neighborhood organization told us that this property is viewed as a gateway to the neighborhood in the art district. The new zoning request will help us achieve the vision of the piano as follows. The proposed zoning creates an opportunity for transit oriented projects across the complex light rail station. The new zoning will allow for live work units where an owner can operate a business on the ground floor while living upstairs, decreasing the expense of operating a small business. The proposed zoning requires street level activation along the Colfax frontage, allowing for a variety of users, including restaurants or businesses that serve the community. With the proposed zoning. Opus will partner with the art district on Santa Fe. To assist with art curation and public art features surrounding the property. Finally, the rezoning will create conditions to support a great new project that will offer improvements in the alley, new sidewalks, utility upgrades, pedestrian plaza and added greenspace. Brian Conaway will not talk about playing guidance. Thank you. All right. Thank you, Joe. Next up, we have Brian Conley. Good evening. Council members Brian Connolly here my business addresses 950 17th Street, Suite 1600. And as Joe mentioned, I am a land use lawyer with OT and Johnson Robinson, Neff and Reagan Eddie. I was asked by the applicant team to specifically touch on the issue of plant support, and we appreciate Mr. Shavers analysis on this topic. So I'll be brief. The proposal will allow for revitalization of an auto oriented, low density intersection and to a much more walkable area that takes advantage of transit access. So in that way, the proposal furthers many of the big picture themes of Blueprint in the Allman Lincoln Park neighborhood plan, including providing access to opportunity, creating affordable housing , establishing conditions to support community oriented businesses, provides mode shift away from cars and towards other forms of transportation, and it provides efficiency in land use and development. Since Brandon provided greater detail on planning guidance, I won't reiterate what's already been said, but we do believe the proposal is most appropriately reviewed under the urban center and neighborhood context and that the future places guidance supports the building height at seven stories along Colfax and scaling down to the south. With respect to the comparison to the existing zoning, the rezoning advances several aspects of planning guidance and brings the property integrator conformance with the plans when compared to the existing zoning. The building height will remain the same as currently entitled in the CM x eight with waivers portion of the site and the zone change will allow for relief from the current are limitation, which makes for less site, less efficient site development and avoids the possibility for surface parking. It maintains protected district upper storey setbacks and reduces height in the CM x five portion of the property, and it will require activation through transparency and street level active uses. So with that, we believe the request is consistent with planning guidance. We agree with staff's analysis. We'd be happy to take questions or discuss this further. We certainly respectfully request your approval. Thank you. Thank you. Next up, we have Jay Fournier. Go ahead, J. Hi. My name is. My name is Jay Fournier. I'm also with the Opus Group. I am here to answer questions on the design architect on the project, working with Joe and Brian. I don't have anything formally to request but just offer my mind if you have any questions regarding the architectural design and the urban planning of the project. Thank you. All right. Thank you, Jay. And our last speaker on this hearing is Jesse Paris. The new members of council cannot be heard. Mm, go ahead. My name is Jefferson Parish, a representative for Denver homicide. Wow. Blackstock, someone with the self defense, has a passion for social change, as well as the Unity Party of Colorado and Mile High Schools. And I will be the next mayor of Denver in 2023. I was with me not in approval of this rezoning. I figured it was going to be more gentrification than usual. This area town has been gentrified, such as other areas of town, the Westside as well. I wanted to know I had a few questions for the occupants. If. You are going to plan on keeping the existing restaurants and retail establishments along with the laundromat. I also wanted to know why only 10% of units are going to be affordable for 99 years. Also, we wanted to know why the army levels are so high since you're talking about affordability. Is this affordable for 60% to 80%? Army is not affordable. Especially when an average annual income in Denver is about $55,000 a year. So. I say that the occupiers did their research better outreach. They reached out to the Arnolds. They reached out to several neighborhood groups. I seen there was one letter of concern. I wanted to know what that letter of concern was. I want to know what the letter of opposition was. And also I want to know what is the guarantee of this actually being affordable. You said that you came out with a neighborhood a neighborhood agreement. Who is going to enforce this agreement for 99 years? And also how many portable units. Is it going to be more than 28? Or is that just the total that's going to be affordable? How many units in total are going to be at this property? And honestly, it's it's got to be next year. This is going to be residential commercial all the above. So a please answer those questions. I will greatly appreciate it. Thank you. All right. Thank you, Jesse. And that concludes our speakers questions from members of Council on Build 1086. Councilwoman Torres. Thank you, Madam President. Brandon, my first two questions are for you on the justifying circumstances. You mentioned that public and private investment along the Santa Fe corridor were one of the things that allowed this to go to higher heights or meet some of the criteria. Can you just give me a sample of what those investments were that qualified for you in your in your analysis? Yes, definitely. So staff looked at recent development that has occurred along Santa Fe since 2010 when the neighborhood plan was adopted. So I think in the application, they specifically call out a mixed use building that's under construction right now along Santa Fe. They also talked about another project that is at Colfax in Osage that just recently opened. And then the public improvements, I believe, are still underway. But there is a project underway by Daddy to make Santa Fe Corridor a quieter sidewalks and public art components to make it more of a walkable place. So I think that staff thought that increasing the height and the density at this location was in going with the neighborhood is changing and was a satisfying, justifying circumstance. Hey. The. Parking minimums here. Can you tell me a little bit more about how how you look at what kind of parking is required here, given either whatever arrangement is made, the type of zoning that it has and its proximity to transit infrastructure. Yep, that's a great question as well. I do not know off the top of my head what the parking requirements are for the C-Max and. It depends on if it's for residential or if it's for a commercial use. I can get back to you on that. And then there's also a parking reduction for being in close proximity to the rail station. So I believe that they. Did get a reduction. Yes. Okay. Thank you, Brendan. Andrew, question for you at Host. If you can give me a little bit more. Information in the in the public about the development agreement that was struck. Sure. We worked with the there's a voluntary, affordable housing agreement that has been struck on this property. It will be in place, as they've talked about it already for 99 years. It takes a total of the 280 units that are anticipated at this particular time and would say 10% of those would be creating 28 units. This is intended to be. There's a for sale clause and there's a rental clause. But the rental is will generate about 25 units at 80% AMI and about three units at 60% AMI. As we were going through the negotiating process, when we looked at the neighborhood and what we were looking for here was really also trying to get larger family units. So we were looking at things with like three bedrooms. We actually were able to come to an agreement that all of the three bedroom units in this project would be affordable. So there's we they did go the extra mile to actually get a larger family units in this in this agreement. So did you have any other questions? You mentioned a for sale clause. What does that mean for affordability? So it provides an option. So if you have a rental, if you if the project's all for rent, then it would be everything would be 80 and 60% AMI. But if they operate for sale, then it would be actually it's the same. It's 80. It's sorry. It's sometimes are different. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, Andrea. And then my final questions are for the applicant, Joe or Brian. So several of the businesses in the retail area have closed. I've noticed recently, but I know the restaurant remains. There might be some others. Have you been has there been conversation with any of the businesses that have remained about continuing on with the project? What does that look like so far? I know. It's throwing a. Wrench and everything, but. Yeah, COVID has affected some of the local businesses there. Um, I know the Starbucks, um, the two other businesses are planning to leave. Um, and we worked actually hand in hand with the laundromat to kind of figure out how to relocate them. Um, so we've come to agreement with them. Um, part of our purchase agreement that doesn't allow us to speak with the tenants directly as we have, we've had to go through the landlord. But the project is designed where we can bring back these local tenants, um, and keep them in the project if necessary and if they want to stay a part of our outreach engagement. Over the last 15 months, we met with Irene Aguilar and asked them through our programs to try and help out with a time in between when construction starts and when the building would be open for these retailers. And we hope this is committed to really help these tenants and act as a liaison between the tenants and to try to figure out a way to make that work. Okay. That's helpful. So Andrew gave a little bit of a rundown of the development agreement, and I remember in committee it was clarified that you can designate the affordable units for a certain population. I think my question was, how do you make sure that it's not students, that it really is families and not a set of roommates that might be occupying the three bedroom? How would that actually. Work in your in your. View? Sure. So, first of all, we're renting by the unit and not by the bed. And that is typically a natural deterrent to students. You know, they're looking for, you know, to rent a bed and not be held accountable for an entire unit. We also we rent on a 12 month rental cycle, and it's not based on the academic calendar. It's also my understanding that their housing policy allows us to cater towards that family, and that's what we intend to do. Okay. On the art curation, I know that you and I saw the letter from the district. Thank you for working with them. What does that look like? Does that look like art shown in the lobby or. I thought I remembered artist studios being discussed at one point. What's the what's the plan for this one? Yeah. So we have a few options. I think first off, we have an opportunity and the right of way on the sidewalks that have some type of sculptures and some type of, uh, a pedestal to really make this feel like a gateway to the art district on Santa Fe. We also have the opportunity to have the assistance from the district and art and are united spaces in the building. And I think the kind of the best option is on the east side of the projects are the proposed project along Kalama. We have a co-working space where it would be floor to ceiling glass and the idea would be like a first Friday. Or if there's some kind of event that the artist from Santa Fe is hosting, that we could have a gallery space there, that a local artist could have their work shown and leave it there for, you know, 2 to 3 month period or whatever would be appropriate for that artist. Thank you so much. And then on the actual development that the build, one of the big pain points of this particular corridor has been the sidewalk along Colfax. And Councilman Hines might remember. When we were. First sworn in, a constituent from downtown who uses a wheelchair to get around, made sure that it was on both of our radar, that he can't use this this particular sidewalk, the utility infrastructure is directly in the middle of it. Can you give us a sense of what you envision that looking like for pedestrians, for for for access? So part of this site development plan process, we worked with the city and we're basically dedicating the first 20 feet between the building and Colfax Avenue as public right away. So that would be an extended sidewalk as well as a tree line. And then we are upgrading all the sidewalks along the Pan Alley map. And then another thing of note is that obviously we bring on an accessibility consultant to make sure not only the public right away is accessible, but also within the building. Great. Thank you. Those are my questions, Madam President. Thank you so much. All right. Thank you, Councilwoman Torres. Councilwoman Ortega. Thank you, Madam President. Joe, if you could just stay on. I've got a few questions for you as well. First of all, did you guys try to acquire the property to the south of the lodge? We did not. Okay. That has historically been city owned property. That's where the Community Development Agency used to be before it was CPD and now Dido. And I had asked our planning director some time ago about planning director, but our Dido director to look at that property and tell us what was the status of it, because it has been vacant for years and years and years and it's an eyesore on our community and it would have been ideal to incorporate into the development. But so that's why I was asking the question whether or not you guys even looked at that, because it will continue to be an eyesore on your property once it's all said and done, if it continues to remain vacant as it is today. Yeah, yeah. There's there's currently a single owner on the property that we're rezoning and we never consider that piece of land to the south. Yeah, it could have been a good opportunity, though. Yeah. It could be. But anyway, so my next question, some several of them were asked by Councilwoman Torres. As far as the it is, is this being done in partnership with new said or did you guys purchased the property from them? Sunnyside actually sold this property to the current owner, I think it was in 2005. Okay. The new set is no longer part of. Okay. Got it. All right. That's good to know. I guess it's. I don't know. I lost track of that back then. Didn't realize that happened. That Fargo. I want to know if you guys have done a traffic study and if that's going to warrant anything new or different with that many units being put on the property. And can you give us an idea of roughly based on the commercial square footage that you're looking at and the residential? How many cars will be on the site? Sure. So we haven't. Had a significant reduction because of its proximity to rail. But you're not going to build a project without some parking. Right. So the code requires us to have 0.75 stalls per unit. We're currently designing at that point nine stalls per unit with retail spaces as well. We haven't yet done a traffic study, but that would be a part of the site development plan process as we get into that further. We submitted our initial plans in October and we're expecting comments here hopefully in the next 2 to 3 weeks. And at that point, we'll have to engage in a traffic study in the current retail on the site, I think there's about 15,000 feet. And so we'll have 10,000 feet of traditional retail and then six live work units. And those are about 1500 square feet each. When you say traditional, you think in a restaurant, some of the neighborhood serving kinds of businesses. Yeah. So the way it's designed on the northeast corner, that could be a restaurant like a sit down restaurant and that's about 3000 feet. And then the Inland Retail to be able to pan kind of mid-block along Colfax. That's going to be very flexible where it could be a sit down restaurant or it could be some type of a drop off laundromat. Really could be anything. Okay, so have you all begun talking to see about whether or not you're going to be pursuing any kind of curb cut off of Colfax? We're actually going to be removing the existing curb cut, and that does require commitment, see done. Um, and so as soon as we get these initial comments back from the step process that will allow us to begin the civil designed documents to engage, see that and start that process just. So that typically you're not going to have a curb cut on Colfax, is that right? You're just going to have a calendar. We'll have one access point, lots of columns, one off of the pan, and then we also have an access point. Oh. So good. Okay. Okay. That's helpful to know. I appreciate that. Let me move through. I've got a few more, if you don't mind. Madam President. We already talked about the parking reduction number of parking spaces the city owned lot. Curb cut. Traffic study. I think. Can you tell us whether or not you're looking at securing any lower income tax credits for the project? Well, we are not. Yeah. The really the only benefit that we are looking for, this is the extra height in zoning. So it will not be asking for any other assistance. Okay. All right. Those are my questions. Thank you much. All right. Thank you, Councilwoman Ortega. Next up, we have Councilman Hines. Thank you, Madam President. I wanted to thank Councilmember Torres for bringing up the point about access on Colfax. I also want to thank the applicant for, I think you said, 20 feet of right away. Wow. So I use a wheelchair for mobility. I add after customer returns brought up the lack of access. I have tweeted about that location to and from from where I live to go over the metro. I would go along this area and I would go in the in the in the parking lot because there was no way for me to get between the rock obstruction and the trees. And so I want to thank you for your commitment to pedestrian access. Colfax, obviously, is a huge transit corridor, perhaps the busiest in the city. I don't I don't know. I haven't looked at the data, but at least for pedestrians and and mixed use. So I want to thank you for for considering the pedestrian access in that and that large sidewalk access. I think that that will really help you with with encouraging people to to live, work and play there and and use whatever businesses in the immediate area. So I just wanted to throw that coming up. Thank you and thank you, councilmember attorneys for bringing that up. And thank you, Madam President. Thank you, Councilman Hines. The public hearing for Council Bill 20 Dash 1086 is closed. Councilmember Torres. Would you like to make any comments since it's in your council district? Thank you so much. This was your group was actually one of the first two that I met with about this particular property. So I know that you've been working on it for a very long time and appreciate. All of the. Measures that have been taken to make sure that different partners within that neighborhood felt really good about the project, that community members felt like it was reflective of llama Lincoln Park. And I hope I would love for that to continue, not just with the art district, but with that community. That's very much an established and historical Chicano neighborhood that's deeply reflected in the art and in the culture surrounding that. It's also. A. Highly mobile. And I love the access that you're granting, particularly at Colfax, as we were discussing. But also, I think the what I'm hoping will be the transparency of the building. I remember a hotel, small hotel, boutique hotel that I visited in Louisville, Kentucky, where their lobby is effectively a a a. Gallery. And an artist studio for the public. And it just made it a really unique space that you don't see too often, especially as you get into the downtown corridor. So I just want to thank all of the partners that have been involved in this and have done it so deeply. And I know this is a project that Susan Stanton was working on, and it was just really a pleasure to be able to to work with her for such a short period of time. And knowing that she had been involved and was involved when we first met, it did breathe an air of confidence of process into this project and I think that has shown through. And just thank you for all the work that you've done. And I'm looking forward to the build and I hope my fellow council members will join me in supporting it. Thank you. Thank you, Councilwoman. Up next, we have help from Sandoval. Thank you, Madam President. I just wanted to echo what Councilman Tory says. I was working in Councilwoman Montero's office in 2012, 2013, when we did the study, pedestrian study and access along Colfax there. And we had talked about the redevelopment of this site and here it is. Now, I'm a council person being able to vote on it, so it's pretty cool. And in season Stanton's memory, I remember being elected and she called me and talked to me about this site and how excited she was about it and the affordability and what were my thoughts about it. And um, even though she's not with us today, her legacy still lives on through all of these buildings. And I miss talking to her and going over things with her. And she would be sitting here with us tonight, surely proud of all the hard work that we need to do so in her honor and her memory. I thank you, Councilman, for bringing that up, because she's been it's been this degree of loss to the families community with through this year. With that, I will also be supporting it this evening. Thank you. All right. Thank you, Councilman Sandoval. And and thank you both for bringing up Susan's memory. She is definitely near and dear and had her networks all over the city, if not the region. And so I'm happy to support this tonight as it meets all of the criteria. Madam Secretary, roll call. For us. I. Well, I. Peter Baker. I. Ah. All right. When? I. Brendan. I. Time. I. I. Can I? Ortega, I. I. Sawyer. I. Madam President. I. Madam Secretary, closed the voting and announced the results. 1313 ies council bills 20 dash 1086 has passed. Councilmember Sandoval, will you please put Council Bill 1127 on the floor for final passage?